Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Sept 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Corinne Biddell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Corinne Biddell

  • Postcode verified

    B65 9HU

  • Name on report verified

    Rowley Hall Primary School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+45Positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyambitiouspositivesupportiveconsistent
Criticismrequires improvementinconsistency

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings551w+62
  • What needs to improve119w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
670
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
5
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Matt Whiteley Headteacher Rowley Hall Primary School Windsor Road Rowley Regis Sandwell West Midlands B65 9HU

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Rowley Hall Primary School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 13 July 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Rowley Hall Primary School

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, governors and the local authority the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Main findings

You were appointed as headteacher in January 2023. Since your appointment, you have empowered staff, ensuring that they are fully on board with the improvements being made. Staff are positive and supportive of your plans, and morale is high. You have identified appropriate areas for development for the school and are addressing pockets of inconsistency that remain.

p.1

Main findings

Since the last inspection, leaders have designed an ambitious curriculum, including in English and early years. The knowledge you want pupils to learn is identified and ordered in a logical way. This means that teachers now have the information they need to deliver the curriculum well. Subject and phase leaders know how to monitor their areas of responsibility. As a result, they are better able to support colleagues and provide further guidance to continue to improve the quality of education for pupils.

p.1

Main findings

Teachers now use assessment information more effectively to adapt teaching for pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). You are continuing to check this to ensure that the use of assessment information is consistent across the whole school. You have also tracked the impact of interventions for pupils with SEND and reading and know that these are supporting pupils’ learning effectively. You intend to reduce the number of out-of-class interventions in the future so that pupils with additional needs can spend more time learning alongside their peers, in line with your vision for a truly inclusive school.

p.2

Main findings

You have invested in external support to develop reading for the whole school. This has made reading a school priority and ensured that all staff are expertly trained in delivering or supporting phonics. Older pupils now receive more effective support to catch up if they are struggling to read fluently. The new roles of reading and writing leaders, with responsibility across the whole school, have been effective in ensuring that knowledge of reading and writing builds sequentially from Nursery to Year 6.

p.2

Main findings

You have strengthened leadership by developing your middle leaders, making them more accountable for their phase or subject. You are aware there is work to do to ensure there is the same consistency and expectations across the whole school for all middle leaders.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has undergone some recent changes that have reduced governors’ current expertise, particularly in SEND. However, governors have become more informed about the curriculum. They have benefited from attending the school improvement group meetings, where external professionals have been able to model offering challenge to leaders. Governors are now more effective in how they hold leaders to account. This is helping to improve the school.

p.2

Main findings

You value the support you have had from the local authority and from other external agencies. This has helped you to develop the curriculum and improve the effectiveness of the provision for pupils with SEND and reading. You have made sure that this support is managed well. Staff said that they receive help and their workloads remain manageable.

p.2

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Sandwell. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion