Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Benedict's Catholic College

Inspected 19 Jul 2023 · published 26 Sept 2023 · URN 115382

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jonathan Rockey (lead), Suzanne Thrower

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Jul 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Jonathan Rockey, Suzanne Thrower

  • Postcode verified

    CO3 3US

  • Name on report verified

    St Benedict’s Catholic College

  • URN verified

    115382

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+45Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconfidentstrongenjoyhigh expectationsconsistentlyeffectivesafestrong relationships
Criticismnot alwaysconcernsseriousnot clearlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings938w+47
  • Safeguarding96w+25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,033
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: St Benedict’s Catholic College Norman Way, Colchester, Essex CO3 3US

p.1

Outcome

St Benedict’s Catholic College continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

‘It’s more than a school: it’s a community’ is one of many positive comments from parents. St Benedict’s is a welcoming school with a strong ethos of caring for pupils and promoting academic achievement. Pupils are respectful to one another and to staff. They are polite and courteous to visitors. Pupils enjoy attending the school and are safe.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ behaviour is typically good. Pupils’ attitudes reflect the high expectations staff have of conduct. There are strong relationships between staff and pupils. They work hard in lessons and learn well. During social times the school is calm, and pupils take part in a range of activities. Most pupils chat and enjoy the company of their peers. Prefects volunteer to support duty staff.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are part of a community that enables them to participate in extra-curricular activities as well as leadership opportunities. The school council, prefects and head students are active across the school. They contribute well to school life. Student councillors have recently organised a multicultural day to celebrate the diversity of the school. Pupils also describe supporting a range of charitable events. As a result of these opportunities, pupils are confident and happy.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Curriculum planning and content in most subjects are carefully thought through and well- established. Leaders at all levels want pupils to succeed academically. Teachers receive relevant training and guidance to enable them to teach well across a range of subjects. The majority of the work provided for pupils helps them to build on what they have learned. They achieve well as a result. Teachers have created learning environments that support pupils’ academic progress. However, in a small number of subjects, assessment is not always used well or consistently. Teachers do not always check how much pupils can remember or understand. As a result, staff are not always able to provide pupils with the right support to improve their learning. 18 and 19 July 2023

p.1

2

Reading is an important part of the school curriculum. Leaders understand the importance of pupils being strong readers. There are clear systems in place to identify and support those pupils who find reading more difficult. Leaders have clear plans to strengthen this further.

p.2

2

Planning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is carefully considered. Leaders engage with the parents of those children with SEND. However, the perception of some parents is that provision for their children does not meet their individual needs. Recruitment challenges have meant the school has had to adapt the way in which it works to support some pupils. In lessons, most pupils do receive appropriate support to enable them to work to the same level as their peers.

p.2

2

Pupils learn through a broader curriculum that supports their wider development well. Through a programme of personal, social and health education (PSHE), pupils learn about healthy relationships, careers education and online safety. They can describe how to keep themselves safe online, and the importance of consent in relationships.

p.2

2

Classrooms are calm and focused places to learn. Pupils respond to the clear routines established by staff. Teachers present information clearly, and pupils are confident to answer questions. Pupils interact positively with staff.

p.2

2

The school is well led and managed. School leaders and governors are ambitious for pupils’ learning and achievement. They work together to ensure that pupils’ academic potential is recognised, and that there is a high level of pastoral care. Governors understand their statutory obligations and fulfil them well. School leaders are held to account effectively by governors. This supports whole-school improvement. Leaders engage well with staff. Staff feel that workload is considered by leaders.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

The school has effective systems in place to ensure that safer recruitment practices are rigorously implemented. Pre-employment checks are recorded accurately. Leaders at all levels have a comprehensive understanding of safeguarding requirements. Leaders seek advice from external services where this is required, making referrals when appropriate. Staff are confident in their knowledge of safeguarding. They know how to report concerns. Pupils feel confident to report concerns to adults. Online safety for pupils is part of the PSHE curriculum. Pupils can describe how to keep themselves safe both online and offline.

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In a small number of subjects, teachers do not use assessment well to check what pupils know and understand. As a result, pupils’ misconceptions are not addressed and they are not clear about how to improve their work. Leaders should ensure that staff 18 and 19 July 2023

p.2

3

have the training and guidance they need to implement the school’s approaches to assessment consistently across all subjects.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in November 2013.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 18 and 19 July 2023

p.3

School details

Inspection number 10288448 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 7 February 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 St Benedict’s is part of the Diocese of Brentwood.  The last inspection of the college’s religious character took place in March 2022.  The school makes use of one unregistered alternative provider.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken this into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the principal, senior leaders, staff, a representative from the diocese, the chair of governors, and representatives from the governing body.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, computing, mathematics, and history. For each deep dive inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum planning, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors spoke with staff and pupils. The lead inspector met with the designated safeguarding lead and reviewed 18 and 19 July 2023

p.4

5

safeguarding records and how these are followed up. The lead inspector also reviewed the single central records of pre-employment checks that are carried out before staff are appointed to work at the school. The lead inspector also reviewed information about the safer recruitment of staff.  Inspectors met with pupils from different year groups to talk about their learning and experiences at school.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documents provided by the school. These included the school improvement plan, curriculum documentation and school policies. Inspectors also reviewed the information that is published on the school’s website.  Inspectors considered 189 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for parents, Ofsted Parent View. This included 136 comments from parents and carers in the free- text facility. The inspectors also considered 74 responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.5

Inspection team

Jonathan Rockey, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

Suzanne Thrower Ofsted Inspector 18 and 19 July 2023

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion