Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Charles Saer Community Primary School

Inspected 14 Jul 2023 · published 21 Sept 2023 · URN 119277

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Emma Jackson (lead), Cleo Cunningham, David Lobodzinski

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Jul 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Cleo Cunningham, David Lobodzinski, Emma Jackson

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    FY7 8DD

  • Name on report verified

    Charles Saer Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    119277

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyambitioushigh expectationspoliteproudwell sequencedhigh-qualitystrong
Criticismconcernsfalling behindat risklackslacktoo slownot well designedincomplete

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1133w+33
  • Safeguarding100w−6
  • What needs to improve31w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,228
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection of Charles Saer Community Primary School Grange Road, Fleetwood, Lancashire FY7 8DD

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 13 and 14 July 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils, including children in the early years, are happy at Charles Saer School. Everyone is welcome in this caring and inclusive school. Pupils have very good relationships with adults. This is because they know that adults care for them and keep them safe.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders expect pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), to achieve well. However, pupils do not achieve as well as they should in some subjects. This is because leaders have not considered clearly enough what they want pupils to learn in every subject. They have recently made improvements in some subjects. However, pupils have not benefited fully from them.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. The school is orderly and pupils are very polite. They enjoy putting their names on the Wow Board when they have done something they are proud of. They are confident that leaders and staff will listen to their concerns. Leaders deal with any incidents of bullying well.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils appreciate the many opportunities they have to develop their interests and talents. They enjoy after-school clubs, such as taekwondo, sewing, archery and art. Older pupils enjoy the annual trip to Paris.

p.2

better?

Leaders are ambitious about what pupils can achieve. However, they have not realised that vision in full. Pupils, including those with SEND, do not learn all that they should in every subject.

p.2

better?

Leaders have made some improvements to the curriculum. For example, in mathematics and geography they have identified exactly what pupils should learn. They have organised knowledge in a logical order and new learning successfully builds on what pupils already know and can do. In these subjects, teachers present information clearly and check what pupils know and understand.

p.2

better?

In other subjects, the curriculum is not well designed and lacks clarity. Leaders have not given teachers enough guidance on exactly what pupils should learn and in what order. As a result, the activities that staff prepare for pupils sometimes lack purpose. Leaders do not ensure that teachers’ checks on learning give them enough information to know if pupils have missing or insecure knowledge. In these subjects, pupils do not achieve well.

p.2

better?

Leaders have prioritised reading after disappointing published results in 2022. Children’s phonics lessons begin as soon as they start school. Pupils read books that match the sounds that they are learning. This means that they are reading with increasing accuracy and confidence in the early years. However, in key stage 1, teachers do not identify or help pupils who are falling behind in phonics quickly 13 and 14 July 2023

p.2

3

enough. In key stage 2, the reading curriculum does not build systematically on pupils’ previous learning. Teaching does not give pupils sufficient opportunity to practise comprehension skills and develop fluency. Pupils in key stages 1 and 2 do not achieve as well as they should in reading.

p.3

3

Curriculum improvements in the early years are beginning to bear fruit. Leaders have constructed a curriculum that is ambitious and well sequenced. Teachers give children interesting and engaging activities. They develop their knowledge and vocabulary across the curriculum. Children in early years acquire the skills and knowledge that they need and are well prepared for Year 1.

p.3

3

Leaders make sure they identify pupils with SEND as early as possible. They work with staff and specialist providers to make some adaptations to the curriculum and teaching so that these pupils can learn alongside their classmates.

p.3

3

Pupils are polite and well mannered. They move around the school in a calm and orderly way. Children in the early years quickly learn what staff expect of them and follow rules and routines sensibly. When a small number of pupils demonstrate challenging behaviour, leaders make sure that staff give them the help that they need so that they do not disrupt learning.

p.3

3

Leaders have thought carefully about how to provide for pupils’ personal development. Pupils, including those with SEND, enjoy access to a wide range of high-quality clubs, activities and experiences. Leaders consistently promote their well-being. The curriculum allows them to learn about relationships, healthy living and the wider world. Older pupils readily take on a range of leadership roles, including those of school councillors and play leaders.

p.3

3

Leaders, including governors, know that recent results have been disappointing and that improvements are necessary. They are clear about what the school does well and what needs to improve. They support staff well in managing their workload and well-being. Staff are proud to work at Charles Saer.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders are diligent in their approach to safeguarding. Staff receive regular training and know how to spot if a pupil is at risk and what to do about any concerns they may have.

p.3

Safeguarding

Relationships with families are strong. Leaders and pastoral staff work with a range of agencies to support families and help them get the assistance that they need. Families are appreciative of the work of the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that pupils learn how to keep themselves safe, including online and when they are out in the community. 13 and 14 July 2023

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some subjects, leaders’ curriculum designs remain underdeveloped and/or incomplete. Leaders have not thought carefully enough about exactly what they want pupils to learn. Nor have they placed sufficient emphasis on how to select the most appropriate activities for pupils. As a result, pupils do not learn as well as they should. Leaders should continue to develop the curriculum in every subject so that pupils can know more and remember more.  Leaders do not make sure that teachers’ checks on learning give them enough information to identify missing or insecure knowledge. As a result, teachers cannot address pupils’ misunderstandings or gaps in knowledge quickly enough. Leaders should ensure that teachers can check precisely what pupils know and understand so that they learn more effectively over time.  Teachers are too slow to identify and help those pupils in key stage 1 who are falling behind in phonics. As a result, some pupils are not ready for the curriculum

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

in key stage 2 because they do not read as confidently or fluently as they should. Leaders should make sure that teachers quickly identify and help pupils who are not keeping up with the phonics programme so that underdeveloped reading skills do not hinder their readiness for learning in key stage 2.  In key stage 2, the design of the reading curriculum does not allow teachers to build on pupils’ previous learning. In addition, teaching does not give pupils enough opportunity to practise comprehension and develop fluency. Leaders should review the content and implementation of the reading curriculum to ensure that pupils in key stage 2 learn to read with appropriate fluency and increasingly good comprehension.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 13 and 14 July 2023

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 22 February 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Leaders do not use alternative provision.  The headteacher has been appointed since the previous inspection.  The school operates a breakfast club.  The school has provision for two-year-olds.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This is the first routine inspection since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors conducted deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, science, art and geography. For each deep dive, they discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to 13 and 14 July 2023

p.5

6

some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. They listened to pupils read to a familiar adult.  Inspectors met with the headteacher and members of the senior leadership team. They also met with subject leaders and a group of teachers.  An inspector met with governors. The lead inspector also spoke with a local authority adviser to the school.  Inspectors spoke with pupils in meetings and around the school.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, and the staff questionnaire. There were no responses to the pupil questionnaire.  Inspectors also met with parents and carers as they brought their children to school.

p.6

Inspection team

Emma Jackson, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

David Lobodzinski Ofsted Inspector 13 and 14 July 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion