Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Mead Primary School

Inspected 28 Jun 2023 · published 18 Sept 2023 · URN 102322

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rebekah Iiyambo (lead), Sukwinder Samra

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Jun 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Rebekah Iiyambo, Sukwinder Samra

  • Postcode verified

    RM3 9JD

  • Name on report verified

    Mead Primary School

  • URN verified

    102322

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 12% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectivepositivewell supportedrespectfulproudenjoyeffectively
Criticismconcernsat riskseriousfalling behindnot consistentlynot securenot ambitiousnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1312w+6
  • Safeguarding89w+51

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,391
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Mead Primary School Amersham Road, Harold Hill, Romford, Essex RM3 9JD

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The next inspection will therefore be a graded inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This school, which is at the centre of its community, is valued by parents, carers and pupils. Pupils are happy. Staff support the well-being of pupils and their families. Parents appreciate the partnership working and effective communication from leaders.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are safe. Staff are there for them should they have any concerns or worries. Pupils adhere to the five behaviour rules of the ‘Mead Creed’. The school is a calm, focused and respectful place to be. Pupils receive help with their behaviour, when needed. Bullying is rare, and any occurrences are dealt with by adults.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils actively participate in sport and music competitions. They are proud winners of the Stratford and East London Music Festival. Pupils have empathy with others less fortunate than themselves. They fundraise for charities. They enjoy taking on a range of leadership responsibilities. Elected members of the pupil parliament have helped to develop school uniform and feedback policies. Older pupils say they benefit from the ‘University of Mead’.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The curriculum is sometimes not as ambitious as it could be. Some pupils, especially those in the early years and those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not learn as well as they could.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Relationships with families are strong and effective. Parents are supported to understand their child’s learning and how to support them at home.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

‘Theo’, the reading dog, and the 105 ‘books to read before you leave Mead’ encourage pupils to read. Parents say that they are pleased with their child’s reading progress. Staff’s 27 and 28 June 2023

p.1

2

knowledge of phonics teaching is strong. Catch-up programmes support pupils at risk of falling behind in their reading. However, teachers’ understanding of pupils’ phonic knowledge is sometimes inaccurate. On occasion, they do not provide books that support pupils to practise the sounds they know. As such, pupils’ confidence and fluency in reading are affected.

p.2

2

Recent improvements to the curriculum are making a positive difference. Subject leaders have set out what pupils need to learn. In physical education, for example, leaders support teachers effectively to develop their subject knowledge. In some subjects, careful thought has been given to what pupils will learn in Years 1 to 6. However, leaders are not clear about the essential knowledge that pupils need to secure in the early years if they are to be well prepared for Year 1.

p.2

2

In some subjects, staff think carefully about how to adapt the curriculum to ensure that pupils learn important knowledge securely. For example, in the early years, children are well supported by adults to develop their understanding of number. Children use a range of resources to develop their mathematical knowledge. In Year 4, teachers take time to embed the concepts of fractions and decimals. This thinking about how to adapt the curriculum does not happen across all subjects. As a result, some pupils, including those in the early years and those with SEND, do not build their knowledge as well as they should. Linked to this, teachers’ checks on what pupils know and remember are not routinely accurate. This means that gaps in pupils’ learning are sometimes not identified and addressed.

p.2

2

Leaders and staff work hard to ensure that provision for pupils with SEND is effective. Good- quality training and strong links with other agencies enable staff to develop a range of strategies to support pupils’ needs. Parents are positive about the support their child receives.

p.2

2

Pupils support each other and get along well. In the early years, children cooperate and focus on their chosen activities. Additional support and guidance help pupils who struggle to manage their behaviour. Pastoral support across the school is carefully considered.

p.2

2

Assemblies provide opportunities for pupils to learn about those with protected characteristics. Pupils gain valuable experience in the diversity of modern Britain. Pupils are tolerant of others and respect difference. Pupils proudly spoke to inspectors about the different school clubs they attend.

p.2

2

Leaders and the governing body have developed a sense of renewed ambition for the school. The teaching of phonics and mathematics has benefited from recent external support. Staff feel well supported by leaders, who are mindful of their workload and well- being. They appreciate the training opportunities provided, which supports their development, and they value the open-door policy of leaders.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 27 and 28 June 2023

p.2

3

Leaders know pupils and families well. Safeguarding records are detailed and closely monitored. The recording system enables leaders to gain a comprehensive picture of safeguarding issues. Leaders work well with a range of agencies to ensure that pupils and their families receive the support they need. Staff receive regular training and updates. They are alert to any problems that pupils may face. Pupils are supported to understand how they can keep themselves safe, including when accessing the internet.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 When pupils are learning to read, the books they are given are not precisely matched to the sounds they know. This means that pupils do not learn to read with fluency as quickly as they could. Leaders must ensure that staff accurately assess pupils and match books to each pupil’s phonic knowledge so that pupils can practise the sounds they know and improve their reading confidence and fluency.  In some subjects, the school’s curriculum does not identify the key knowledge that all pupils, including those with SEND, need to secure in the early years if they are to be ready for subject learning in Year 1. Leaders need to ensure that curriculum thinking sets out the key knowledge and skills that they want children to know and remember from the early years so they can get off to a good start in Year 1.  The work of subject leaders to improve the quality of education is not complete in all areas of the curriculum. This means that some teachers are not provided with sufficient

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

guidance to adapt their teaching in these subjects. Some pupils, including those with SEND, do not grasp key knowledge. Leaders need to provide teachers with guidance and training to adapt their teaching well in all subjects, for all pupils, including those with SEND.  The checks that teachers make on pupils’ learning, especially for pupils with SEND, do not consistently identify gaps in individual pupil’s knowledge and skills. Pupils do not have sufficient opportunities to revisit knowledge that is not secure in their long-term memory. Leaders should ensure that assessment assists teachers in identifying clear next steps for pupils, including pupils with SEND.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually, this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. 27 and 28 June 2023

p.3

4

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in October 2016.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 27 and 28 June 2023

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10200189 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 6 and 7 October 2016, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school has experienced several changes of headteacher and a new chair of the governing body since the previous inspection. The current headteacher took up post in January 2023.  There is a specially resourced provision for up to 12 pupils with autism spectrum disorder.  This school does not make use of any alternative provision.  This school is part of The Learning Federation with Broadford Primary School.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, other senior leaders, teachers and support staff. 27 and 28 June 2023

p.5

6

 Inspectors met with several groups of pupils. Inspectors also observed pupils at playtimes.  The lead inspector met with seven members of the governing body.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and physical education. In each deep dive, inspectors spoke with leaders and teachers, visited lessons (including in the specially resourced provision for pupils with SEND), spoke with pupils and looked at examples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also spoke with leaders and looked at pupils’ work in a small number of other subjects.  The lead inspector listened to some pupils read to staff.  To check the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors checked the record of pre- appointment checks, looked at safeguarding documentation, spoke with staff, pupils and members of the governing body and spoke with a representative of Havering local authority.  Inspectors studied a range of documents, including the school’s self-evaluation and

p.6

6

development plan.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. They also spoke with some parents at the beginning of the school day. Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff and pupil questionnaires.

p.6

Inspection team

Rebekah Iiyambo, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Sukwinder Samra Ofsted Inspector 27 and 28 June 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion