Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Long Lane Church of England Primary School

Inspected 29 Jun 2023 · published 18 Sept 2023 · URN 112846

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Vic Wilkinson (lead), Rachael Snowdon-Poole

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Jun 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Rachael Snowdon-Poole, Vic Wilkinson

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DE6 5BJ

  • Name on report verified

    Long Lane Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    112846

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveenjoypositiveimprovedwell sequencedwarmproudprecise
Criticismnot yetpoorweaknessesincompleteyet toseriouslynot cleardo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1070w+4
  • Safeguarding116w+64
  • What needs to improve28w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,176
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 56
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 1%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of Long Lane Church of England Primary School Long Lane, Dalbury Lees, Ashbourne, Derbyshire DE6 5BJ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Inadequate 28 and 29 June 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Long Lane is a warm and welcoming school. Pupils are proud to attend. They get on well with each other and the adults they work with. As one pupil said: ‘It’s a small school. We all get to know everyone and enjoy being together.’ Parents agree.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well and know what is expected of them, including the school’s golden rules. They know why it is important to be gentle, kind and helpful, to listen, to be honest, to work hard and to look after property. They enjoy moving up through the traffic light reward system and earning ‘Dojo’ points. They understand what happens in the event of poor behaviour. A rating of red is taken seriously. However, pupils say that this rarely happens.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils relish social times. Pupils of all ages play cooperatively outside. They enjoy being on the field and making use of the wide range of equipment that is available.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Like pupils, staff and parents are positive about the school. They say that pupils are well catered for. However, while the school has improved significantly over the last year, it is still not good. Weaknesses in the curriculum and the provision for pupils’ personal development remain.

p.2

better?

Teaching pupils to read is a curriculum priority. The school’s phonics programme is well organised. It is taught well. Pupils learn sounds in a logical order. The books that pupils read are closely matched to the sounds they know. As a result, pupils quickly master phonics.

p.2

better?

Leaders have designed and implemented a well-thought-out curriculum. Overall, it sets out what pupils are to learn at each stage of their education. Where it has been fully developed, it is well sequenced. In these instances, it builds on what pupils have learned before and prepares them well for what comes next. However, this work is incomplete. Some parts of the curriculum are not yet fully sequenced. Leaders are working swiftly to address this. Additionally, while the curriculum sets out what pupils will study, it does not make clear enough the precise knowledge that pupils are to acquire.

p.2

better?

Provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) has improved. The new special educational needs and disabilities coordinator (SENDCo) has quickly put in place systems to identify pupils with SEND. Plans outline the help that should be in place for pupils. However, in some cases, the targets contained within these plans are too broad. They do not set out what pupils are expected to achieve over shorter periods of time. As a result, in some cases, adults do not provide the right support at the right time. 28 and 29 June 2023

p.2

3

Provision for pupils’ personal development has been strengthened. Leaders have thought carefully about how to promote pupils’ social, moral, and cultural development. There is a comprehensive programme for personal, social and health education (PSHE) in place. There has been a focus on teaching fundamental British values and the protected characteristics. However, this work is at a very early stage of development. It has not yet resulted in pupils having a full grasp of what they learn. For example, pupils can name different protected characteristics, but they do not understand what they mean in the context of life in modern Britain.

p.3

3

The quality of leadership has strengthened considerably over the last 12 months. Senior leaders have a much sharper understanding of their roles and responsibilities. Effective accountability and quality assurance measures have been introduced. As a result, there is a shared purpose across the staff team. The implementation of the curriculum is improving. However, many of these measures are still in their infancy and have yet to impact on the overall quality of education provided. Nevertheless, the school has the capacity for continued improvement.

p.3

3

Governors provide effective challenge and support. They have ensured that the work of the local authority and that of the supporting multi-academy trust has been combined and has secured improvements.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Keeping pupils safe is the school’s highest priority. Staff are trained to spot the indicators that may mean that pupils need help. Safeguarding training for staff is comprehensive and regular. Leaders regularly check that staff know and remember training content. Weekly reminders and agenda items keep safeguarding front and centre of the work of adults in the school. Leaders take swift action when it is needed. They systematically return to issues to check that the actions taken are having a positive impact.

p.3

Safeguarding

Safeguarding records are detailed and shared with those who need to know.

p.3

Safeguarding

Governors carry out a wide range of checks to ensure that safeguarding arrangements are working effectively.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Curriculum planning and implementation are incomplete. In some places, the curriculum has not been fully sequenced. This means that it does not make consistently clear what pupils will learn and when. Leaders should ensure that the 28 and 29 June 2023

p.3

4

curriculum is fully planned and sequenced to enable pupils to achieve well across the curriculum.  The curriculum sets out what pupils will study. However, it does not make clear the knowledge that pupils are expected to acquire and commit to their long-term memory. As a result, teachers do not know which aspects of the curriculum to prioritise. Leaders should ensure that the curriculum makes clear the precise content that pupils are expected to know and remember.  Pupils with SEND have plans in place that outline the help they should receive. The targets within these plans are too broad. They do not set out precisely what pupils are expected to achieve on a termly basis. As a result, some adults do not provide the right sort of support at the right time. Leaders should ensure that plans for pupils with SEND contain targets that are specific and measurable.  Work to promote pupils’ personal development is at a very early stage of

p.4

4

implementation. It has not yet resulted in pupils having a full grasp of what they learn. Leaders should ensure that the school’s personal development programme is fully implemented and results in pupils learning and remembering the content of the PSHE curriculum.  Effective accountability and quality assurance measures have been introduced. However, many of these measures are still in their infancy and have yet to impact on the overall quality of education provided. Leaders should ensure that their recently introduced measures are embedded and fully impact on the quality of education at the school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 28 and 29 June 2023

p.4

School details

Local authority Derbyshire County Council

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10265750 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 21 and 28 June 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Acorn Federation. The executive headteacher is also the headteacher of Marston Montgomery Primary School.  The school is a voluntary-controlled Church of England school in the Diocese of Derby. The most recent section 48 inspection took place in March 2017. This is an inspection of the school’s religious character.  The school does not use any alternative provision.  The school runs a before- and after-school club, which is managed by the governing body.  Currently, there are three children in the Reception Year. The early years was inspected alongside the key stage 1 provision and as part of the quality of education judgement. No separate judgement was made for the early years.  The school has received support from a local multi-academy trust. 28 and 29 June 2023

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a graded (section 5) inspection under the same Act.

p.6

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 13(4) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, the lead teachers, curriculum leaders, the early years leader, the SENDCo and groups of staff and pupils.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in three subjects: reading, mathematics, and geography. To do this, they met with curriculum leaders, visited lessons, looked at pupils’ work and met with teachers and pupils. Inspectors also spoke to leaders, looked at curriculum documentation for a range of other subjects, including computing, history and physical education.  The lead inspector met with representatives of the local governing body, including the chair. He met with a representative of the local authority. He also held a telephone discussion with a representative of the multi-academy trust that has been providing support to the school.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors took account of the responses to the Ofsted Parent View survey and written comments from parents. Inspectors spoke informally to parents outside the school. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.  Inspectors met with safeguarding leaders. They reviewed school documents, including those relating to safeguarding, governance, behaviour and attendance. Inspectors scrutinised leaders’ plans for improvement and their assessment of the school’s effectiveness.  Inspectors spoke informally to pupils at breaktimes, in the dining hall and on the playground. An inspector visited the school’s breakfast club.

p.6

Inspection team

Vic Wilkinson, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Rachael Snowdon-Poole Ofsted Inspector 28 and 29 June 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion