Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Sept 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael Pennington

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Pennington

  • Postcode verified

    L21 0DB

  • Name on report verified

    Litherland High School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−10Mixedmore positive than 22% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveambitioussuccessfullyimprovedimprovingconfidentsecure
Criticismweaknessesshortcomingsgapsrequires improvementlackunevennot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings794w−3
  • What needs to improve177w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
970
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

David Yates Principal Litherland High School Sterrix Lane Litherland Liverpool Merseyside L21 0DB

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Litherland High School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on Wednesday 21 June 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Litherland High School

During the inspection, I met with you and other senior leaders. I also met with groups of subject leaders, staff and pupils. I spoke with representatives of those responsible for governance and representatives of the multi-academy trust to discuss the actions taken since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID- 19 pandemic. I evaluated recent developments to the school’s curriculum. I also considered records of safeguarding and records of pupils’ attendance. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the school to

The school should take further action to:

p.1

progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the school to

 strengthen the quality of opportunities that promote, encourage and support pupils’ wider reading.

p.1

Main findings

Since the most recent graded inspection, five governors have left the local governing body (LGB) and two have joined. A new chair of the LGB took up post in September 2022. You have increased the number of senior leaders. An assistant principal joined the senior leadership team in September 2022. During this time, 11 staff have left the school and 23 have joined.

p.2

Main findings

You and other leaders have an in-depth understanding of the weaknesses in the quality of education and leadership and management at the school. Together, you have increased the pace with which you are implementing ambitious plans to secure improvement. You have focused on creating a culture of mutual respect to ensure that staff support your work to tackle the shortcomings at the school. As a result, you are successfully strengthening the quality of education that pupils receive.

p.2

Main findings

You ensure that the LGB are well informed about the impact of your actions to bring about improvement. The support and challenge that you and other leaders receive from members of the LGB is strengthening leadership across all levels.

p.2

Main findings

You, and other leaders, have improved the systems to ensure that subject leaders receive better guidance and stronger support from senior leaders. This is helping subject leaders to gain the expertise that they need to monitor and evaluate the quality of education in their subjects. The focus, quality and rigour of subject leaders’ checks are improving. Teachers described the feedback that they receive from monitoring activities as increasingly valuable. This is because gaps in subject knowledge or teaching practices are being identified and staff are receiving the support that they need to improve. However, some subject leaders are further ahead than others. This means that the effectiveness of the checks on teachers’ delivery of the curriculum is uneven across subjects.

p.2

Main findings

You, and other leaders, are supporting staff to ensure that their curriculum thinking enables pupils to learn all that they should. Teachers now have a clearer understanding of the knowledge that all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), should learn. Pupils appreciate that teachers across subjects are getting more confident in explaining new concepts. This is because the activities that pupils do in lessons are usually linked to the explanations that teachers have given. However, this is still markedly better in some subjects than others.

p.2

Main findings

You have restructured the timeframes for common assessment points across all subjects. With other leaders, you have ensured that subject staff have benefited from training to better understand the different purposes of assessment. Subject staff are currently in the process of strengthening assessment strategies within different curriculum areas. This work is improving the quality of assessment information in some subjects. However, in some subjects, the purpose and focus of assessment activities is less clear. You have suitable plans to address this. You, and other leaders, are making sure that those pupils who have the gaps in their reading knowledge are identified quickly. Pupils at the early stages of learning to read receive increasingly effective support to help them to read with greater fluency and accuracy. This is helping them to access the curriculum more easily than they did in the past.

p.2

Main findings

You, and other leaders, have begun to develop strategies to promote reading for all pupils. You have introduced dedicated reading time for pupils in Years 7 to 9. You are beginning to engage with pupils to identify what will help to increase their use of the library. You are ensuring that pupils take part in a range of reading focused events to introduce and expose them to different text types. However, the quality of these opportunities is mixed, and, consequently, many pupils lack interest in reading.

p.3

Main findings

The trust is making a significant contribution to the ongoing development of leaders and staff. Support from the trust has strengthened subject leaders’ knowledge and practice of how to check on the quality of education in their subjects. Subject leaders have benefited from support to strengthen their subject curriculums, while teachers have been helped to improve their delivery of the curriculum.

p.3

Main findings

You, and other leaders, have carefully identified where some subjects would benefit from the additional support of external partners. In these cases, you have made effective use of support from other local trusts and schools to support curriculum development, staff’s subject expertise and staff’s use of assessment strategies.

p.3

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Heath Family Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Sefton. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion