Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Deykin Avenue Junior and Infant School
Summary
Debra Newman (lead), Sarah Malam
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
22 Mar 2023
- Inspectors verified
Debra Newman, Sarah Malam
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
B6 7BU
- Name on report verified
Deykin Avenue Junior and Infant School
- URN verified
103313
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders should make sure that all staff have consistently high expectations of pupils’ behaviour so that all pupils show positive attitudes to their learning. p.4
- Most staff enjoy working at this school and feel well supported. p.3
- This means that they are confident and knowledgeable about the risks that children may face. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There are still instances of poor behaviour in a minority of classrooms that disrupt pupils’ learning. p.3
- In these classrooms, adults do not consistently reinforce high expectations. p.3
- The curriculum is not consistently well planned and sequenced. p.4
- Pupils know what bullying is and that inappropriate name- calling and racism are unacceptable. p.2
- These weaknesses limit the progress that pupils with SEND make. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This has meant that too many pupils are not receiving the quality of education that they should; weaknesses elsewhere have been allowed to persist. p.4
- Those responsible for governance should continue to work with external partners and the interim headteacher to address the identified weaknesses in the school. p.4
- This means that pupils are not building effectively on their learning over time and so do not make the progress that they should. p.4
- Consequently, children are not as well prepared for Year 1 as they should be. p.4
- Leaders have not carefully considered the smaller blocks of learning that pupils need to know to complete more complex tasks. p.2
- They have appointed an interim headteacher who has quickly identified and acted on the changes that need to be made. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes8
“These weaknesses limit the progress that pupils with SEND make.” p.3Reading & phonics5
“Children in early years enjoy listening to stories.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,313
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Deykin Avenue Junior and Infant School Deykin Avenue, Witton, Birmingham, West Midlands B6 7BU
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 21 and 22 March 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Over time, leaders at Deykin Avenue Junior and Infant School do not have high enough expectations for all pupils. Teachers and support staff are not fully aware of the support needed for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). This means that pupils with SEND do not make the progress of which they are capable.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils feel safe in school. Pupils know what bullying is and that inappropriate name- calling and racism are unacceptable. However, a minority of staff do not manage pupils’ behaviour consistently well This results in some pupils experiencing disruption to their learning.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Children in early years enjoy listening to stories. They learn to read and apply their phonic knowledge. However, teachers do not support them effectively to develop their early language skills in a coherent and consistent way. This slows their progress.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Parents and carers engage well with the school. They are positive about the pastoral support it offers. Staff are proactive in responding to fundraising activities which come from pupils’ concerns about major world events, such as the Turkish earthquakes and refugees escaping war. Together they have raised significant amounts of money to support people in need.
p.2
better?
Over time, leaders have not established clear aims and expectations across the school. Since the last inspection, developments to improve the curriculum have been too slow. In most subjects, leadership is not being developed to enable teachers to teach a well-planned curriculum that allows pupils to gain the knowledge they need. As a result, pupils are not successfully building on what they know or remembering more of what they have learned.
p.2
better?
Not all teachers have a clear understanding of what pupils should learn in most subjects. Leaders have not carefully considered the smaller blocks of learning that pupils need to know to complete more complex tasks. This means that pupils do not deepen their knowledge and develop their understanding of subjects in a coherent or logical way.
p.2
better?
The interim headteacher has ensured that early reading and phonics are taught well. Teachers and support staff are trained effectively to deliver the phonics programme. Children are engaged in learning to read and respond well to their teachers. They enjoy reading, and some children read with confidence. Leaders’ recent focus on writing is proving beneficial. There are some encouraging early signs of improvement in pupils’ writing. 21 and 22 March 2023
p.2
3
Children in the early years are settled in a calm environment. They enjoy listening to stories and singing songs. However, staff do not provide children with sufficient opportunities to access appropriate resources to explore and discover. This limits their ability to improve their fine motor skills, broaden their vocabulary and make more sense of the world. Leaders are aware of these shortfalls and have taken action to improve early years provision more recently.
p.3
3
Leaders do not identify the needs of pupils with SEND precisely enough. This means that pupils with SEND do not receive the necessary support they need to achieve well. Teachers do not have enough knowledge about which pupils have additional needs, and so they do not adapt activities sufficiently well enough. Leaders do not follow up on the recommendations and guidance from support services. These weaknesses limit the progress that pupils with SEND make.
p.3
3
Most pupils behave appropriately in and around school. They want to do well and show commitment to their work in lessons. There are still instances of poor behaviour in a minority of classrooms that disrupt pupils’ learning. In these classrooms, adults do not consistently reinforce high expectations.
p.3
3
Pupils are beginning to be prepared for life in modern Britain. However, the personal, social and health education curriculum lacks coherence and structure. Pupils are taught how to stay safe online and how to act with kindness and tolerance. They enjoy the different pupil leadership roles and carry them out responsibly.
p.3
3
Leaders recognise that improving attendance is a priority for the school. They work closely with several families with low attendance. However, the impact of this work to support attendance is at an early stage and is yet to be fully seen.
p.3
3
Most staff enjoy working at this school and feel well supported. They say that the support network in school is strong, and they all help each other.
p.3
3
Governors have begun to make changes to the school to address weaknesses, acting on external advice. They have appointed an interim headteacher who has quickly identified and acted on the changes that need to be made. However, the impact of these changes will take time to embed. Consequently, pupils are not receiving an education that enables them to achieve their potential.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Safeguarding is effective. There are clear systems in place to identify vulnerable pupils and report concerns. Staff receive regular training about wider aspects of safeguarding. This means that they are confident and knowledgeable about the risks that children may face. Leaders work closely with external agencies to help families get the support they need. 21 and 22 March 2023
p.3
4
Leaders follow safer recruitment protocols with diligence. They have developed effective procedures to ensure that they manage safeguarding concerns and support vulnerable children and their families well.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The curriculum is not consistently well planned and sequenced. This means that pupils are not building effectively on their learning over time and so do not make the progress that they should. Leaders should make sure that the curriculum in all subjects identifies the important knowledge that pupils need to learn and that learning is sequenced in a logical order so that pupils can build successfully on what they know and understand. Pupils with SEND do not have their needs identified or met well enough. Teachers do not have the knowledge to be able to support pupils with SEND effectively. In addition, leaders are not following up on recommendations made by support services in school. Leaders should take urgent action to improve all aspects of the provision for pupils with SEND so that they are well supported across the school. The behaviour of some pupils is not consistently well managed. Some incidents of
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
poor behaviour in the classroom go unchecked. This means that some pupils experience disruption to their learning. Leaders should make sure that all staff have consistently high expectations of pupils’ behaviour so that all pupils show positive attitudes to their learning. Leaders and those responsible for governance have not taken sufficient action over time to address the systemic weaknesses in the school. This has meant that too many pupils are not receiving the quality of education that they should; weaknesses elsewhere have been allowed to persist. Those responsible for governance should continue to work with external partners and the interim headteacher to address the identified weaknesses in the school. The provision in the early years does not enable children to explore their environment and develop their language skills. Consequently, children are not as well prepared for Year 1 as they should be. Leaders should continue to address
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
the shortcomings in the delivery and resourcing of the early years curriculum to ensure children achieve well. Leaders and those responsible for governance may not appoint early career teachers before the next monitoring inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 21 and 22 March 2023
p.4
5
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 21 and 22 March 2023
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection 20 October 2020, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The previous headteacher left the school in December 2022. An interim headteacher has been in post since January 2023. The school does not use alternative provision. At the time of the inspection, there were a number of staff absences.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.
p.6
Information about this inspection
This was the second routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic 21 and 22 March 2023
p.6
7
with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors carried out deep dives in the following subjects: early reading, mathematics, science and history. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders or those currently overseeing these areas of the curriculum. They spoke to teachers and pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also looked at books and spoke to pupils about some other subjects. Reading was looked at across the curriculum. Inspectors listened to a sample of pupils read. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and at lunchtime. They spoke formally with groups of pupils, as well as talking to pupils in lessons and around school. Inspectors reviewed responses to Ofsted’s online parent, pupil and staff surveys. Inspectors met with staff and spoke to parents at the school gate. Inspectors met with leaders and pastoral support staff to consider the school’s
p.7
7
safeguarding procedures. Inspectors reviewed policies and records relating to safeguarding, behaviour and attendance. Inspectors spoke to pupils, parents and staff about safety and well-being. Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation, including the school’s self- evaluation and improvement plans, minutes of local governing body meetings and information on the school’s website.
p.7
Inspection team
Debra Newman, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Sarah Malam Ofsted Inspector 21 and 22 March 2023
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion