Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Littleham Church of England Primary School

Inspected 18 May 2023 · published 13 Sept 2023 · URN 113370

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 May 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Gavin Summerfield, Sally Hannaford

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    EX8 2QY

  • Name on report verified

    Littleham Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    113370

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−43Criticalmore positive than 28% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivehigh qualitystrongstrengthfeel safehappyenjoysafe
Criticismconcernspoorweaknessesnot alwaysnot effectiveshortcomingsweaktoo slow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1240w−42
  • Safeguarding109w−37

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,310
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 53
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of Littleham Church of England Primary School Littledown Close, Littleham, Exmouth, Devon EX8 2QY

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 17 and 18 May 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are receiving a poor standard of education. Leadership is not effective. Governors have been too slow to intervene to remedy the weaknesses in the school. The curriculum does not meet the needs of all pupils, especially those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Leaders have not ensured that staff are well trained in delivering the school’s curriculum. Consequently, pupils do not achieve well.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Relationships between staff and pupils are a strength of the school. Most pupils feel safe and happy. They have confidence that staff will provide the right support and guidance when they need it. Pupils know what bullying is. They say that bullying is rare and feel supported by staff. However, pupils complain that behaviour is not always positive, and learning is regularly disrupted. This frustrates them as it interrupts their lessons.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils value the extra-curricular clubs that are on offer, like boxercise and pottery. Pupils also learn about water safety. They say that they enjoy learning about how to stay safe on the beach and how their confidence with swimming in the sea has improved. Parents are positive about the work of the school. Leaders know pupils and their families well.

p.2

better?

Senior leaders, including governors, have done too little to tackle the significant shortcomings of the school. Leaders are not ambitious enough for all pupils. They have not ensured that the curriculum identifies the knowledge pupils should learn in all subjects and when they should learn it.

p.2

better?

There have, however, been recent improvements in the early years. Children now have better access to a range of different activities. However, leaders have not prioritised resources that support children’s learning well enough. This means that children are not learning the most efficient way. Changes in staffing have meant that basic routines for learning are not firmly established. As a result, children are not prepared as well as they could be for future learning in key stage 1.

p.2

better?

Teachers do not use assessment well enough to check on what pupils know. In most subjects, gaps in pupils’ knowledge are not identified and misconceptions are not effectively addressed. Consequently, pupils struggle to remember what they have been taught previously. Therefore, pupils do not achieve as well as they should and are not ready for the next stage of their learning.

p.2

better?

A small number of pupils with SEND, who are part of the school’s nurture base, receive a bespoke curriculum which is meeting their needs. However, for the remaining pupils with SEND, the provision is poor. Leaders have not supported staff with useful information to help them to support these pupils. Staff do not adapt the 17 and 18 May 2023

p.2

3

curriculum or teaching to meet their needs. Most pupils with SEND do not receive the support that they need. As a result, they do not achieve as well as they should.

p.3

3

Many subject leaders have not had the opportunity to develop the curriculums they are responsible for. They have not had sufficient direction from senior leaders. They do not have strong enough subject knowledge to support teachers and other adults to deliver an effective curriculum. Due to the turbulence in staffing, leaders have been unable to realise their vision for the curriculum. As a result, pupils do not learn well.

p.3

3

Leaders have not been able to bring about enough improvements in early reading. While leaders have taken some recent actions, there is not a consistent approach to teaching reading. Pupils’ reading books are not routinely matched to the sounds they are learning. Staff are not trained to deliver the phonics programme well enough to ensure that it is of high quality. As a result, pupils do not learn to read well.

p.3

3

Some pupils benefit from wider experiences, such as residential visits and after- school clubs, like boxercise and pottery. Yet, these opportunities do not broaden pupils’ experiences well enough. Pupils’ knowledge of other cultures and fundamental British values is not well developed by the curriculum. Consequently, pupils are not being sufficiently well prepared for life in modern Britain.

p.3

3

Until recently, governors have not sufficiently challenged senior leaders to improve the school, including the quality of education. There has been a significant breakdown in communication between senior leaders and staff. Turbulence in staffing has hindered school improvement and interrupted pupils’ learning. This means that actions to improve the school are not happening quickly enough and involve a high workload for teachers. As a result, staff morale is very low.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have established a culture of vigilance, where safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility. Leaders ensure staff have regular training. Staff have a thorough understanding of the risks relating to safeguarding, particularly the signs that may indicate that a pupil is in danger of harm.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff know how to report safeguarding concerns. Leaders take effective action to follow up concerns. Leaders seek the right support for vulnerable pupils and their families.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that appropriate checks on staff are undertaken before they are appointed. Pupils learn how to keep safe when using the internet. Pupils know how to raise concerns with trusted adults in school.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The curriculum for early reading and phonics is not implemented well. Weak teaching expertise hinders pupils’ progress. As a result, too few Year 1 pupils are meeting the standard in the phonics screening check. Books are not consistently well matched to pupils’ phonic knowledge. Pupils are not building confidence and fluency. Leaders should urgently improve the implementation of all aspects of the early reading and phonics curriculum.  The school’s curriculum is not clearly sequenced or strategically planned. As a result, pupils, including those with SEND, do not build secure knowledge over time. Leaders need to be systematic in their approach to planning the curriculum. They need to ensure that all subjects have a clear progression of knowledge, so that pupils know more and remember more.  Weaknesses in leadership have led to high staff workloads and low staff morale. This is hindering the capacity to bring about much needed improvement.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

Governors must ensure that urgent action is taken to strengthen leadership throughout the school and to ensure that staff are provided with the support that they need to fulfil their roles effectively.  Leaders have not established a clear and effective approach to assessment and feedback. Pupils do not always benefit from helpful feedback. Leaders must ensure that they establish clear expectations for assessment and feedback and that staff apply these consistently.  The school’s provision and ambition for all pupils with SEND is not high enough. The curriculum is not suitably adapted to meet the needs of pupils with SEND not following a bespoke curriculum. As a result, most pupils with SEND do not benefit from a high enough quality of education within the curriculum. Leaders should ensure that the curriculum is adapted to meet the needs of pupils with SEND, so that all pupils with SEND learn well.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The quality of subject leadership is not yet consistent in every subject. This means that pupils do not follow a well-developed curriculum across all subjects. Leaders need to strengthen subject leadership across the school, so it has the expertise and skills to implement strong subject curriculums.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

5

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

5

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 17 and 18 May 2023

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 18 and 19 June 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The school does not use any alternative provision.  The school operates an eight-place resource base for pupils with complex needs within the local authority.  The school is smaller than the average primary school.  The proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is well above the national average.  The proportion of pupils who are disadvantaged is well above the national average.  The school has provision for two-year-olds.  The school is part of the Jubilee with Pebblebed Federation of schools. 17 and 18 May 2023

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.7

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held discussions with the executive headteacher, the head of learning, members of the leadership team, including curriculum leaders, the chair of governors and an education officer from the local authority.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, history and mathematics. This meant that, in each subject, inspectors met with senior and curriculum leaders, talked to pupils, visited lessons, spoke to teachers and looked at pupils’ books.  Inspectors met with staff to consider their views.  Inspectors reviewed safeguarding records, including the single central record of recruitment checks on staff.  Inspectors considered the views of parents who responded to Ofsted’s online

p.7

Information about this inspection

questionnaire, Parent View and the responses to the staff survey.

p.7

Inspection team

Gavin Summerfield, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Sally Hannaford Ofsted Inspector 17 and 18 May 2023

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion