Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Frome Valley CofE First School

Inspected 4 Jul 2023 · published 12 Sept 2023 · URN 141777

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Angela Folland (lead), Sean Millar

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Jul 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Angela Folland, Sean Millar

  • Postcode verified

    DT2 8WR

  • Name on report verified

    Frome Valley C of E VA First School

  • URN verified

    141777

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+2Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyconsistentlysecure knowledgeambitioussaferespectfulpreciselyeffectively
Criticismnot alwaysnot ambitiousstruggleseriousdisruptionnot consistentlyconcernsnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1098w−12
  • Safeguarding113w+71

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,208
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Frome Valley C of E VA First School School Drive, Crossways, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 8WR

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. Inspectors are recommending the next inspection to be a graded inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The curriculum has recently undergone considerable change. This means many of the changes introduced by leaders are still new to pupils. Leaders do not check pupils’ learning well enough across different subjects. Sometimes, teaching does not expect enough of pupils. This all means that, while pupils enjoy their learning, they do not learn as well in some subjects as they do in others.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Nonetheless, pupils try hard and typically behave well. Low-level disruption is rare. Children in the pre-school and Reception Year respond well to established routines. They play and learn together harmoniously. Older pupils are respectful to each other and adults.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are adamant that the most important value of the school charter is to ‘treat other people as you want to be treated’. They know why this is important and ways they can do it. Pupils know and understand the rules. They feel that staff use these consistently and fairly. They like the ‘wow’ rewards and proudly describe their achievements.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy a range of clubs, responsibilities and residential trips. Through these, they develop characteristics such as resilience and courage. They understand these are important life-long qualities.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have designed an ambitious curriculum for all pupils. However, pupils do not all learn as well as they could across different subjects. Leaders do not evaluate the impact on pupils’ learning precisely enough. As a result, some teaching does not ensure that the ambitious curriculum is delivered effectively. 4 July 2023

p.1

2

Leaders have identified the knowledge they want pupils to learn and when. However, teachers do not use assessment well enough to ensure that teaching is precisely matched to what pupils need to learn. For example, in mathematics, some pupils are taught about acute and obtuse angles before they have a secure understanding of right angles. Consequently, they struggle to apply knowledge to new concepts.

p.2

2

Subject leadership is not fully developed. Subject leaders do not have a strong enough overview of their subjects. Teachers use leaders’ plans to deliver the curriculum. However, leaders do not check effectively that their plans are leading to pupils learning the intended curriculum. This means that the training provided for teachers is too generic. It does not support staff to improve their own practice. As a result, some teaching expects too little from pupils and leaders do not realise this or challenge it consistently when they do.

p.2

2

A love of reading is visible throughout the school. Children in the pre-school enjoy listening to familiar rhymes and stories. They learn and play in a language-rich environment. Adults model reading books for pleasure and information. Older pupils are enthusiastic about the changes to the library. They appreciate the range of books that they can choose. The teaching of reading enables most pupils to learn well. However, it is not precise enough to help pupils who struggle with reading. For example, some pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not catch up well enough. This is because teaching does not address misconceptions quickly enough and books do not always match the sounds these pupils know.

p.2

2

Pupils with SEND learn alongside their peers. They are included in all aspects of school life. Leaders are currently developing staff’s understanding of how to adapt the curriculum to enable pupils with SEND to learn well across the curriculum. However, this work is too new for any significant impact to have been seen.

p.2

2

Pupils have a good understanding of how people can be different. They demonstrate respect for different cultures, disabilities and religions. They learn through a well- sequenced personal, social and health education curriculum. They have an age- appropriate knowledge of relationships. They are confident about how to build, solve and restore friendships.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders prioritise keeping pupils safe. They have established a culture where everyone takes responsibility. Staff vigilance is evident in the detailed records and use of reporting systems. Staff have a good understanding of the signs of abuse. Leaders make good use of records and the analysis of information. As a result, they have improved systems over time. This enables them to act swiftly and have all relevant information available to them.

p.2

Safeguarding

Pupils have a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe. They have a particularly secure knowledge of how to stay safe online. They trust adults to listen if they have a worry. 4 July 2023

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Teaching does not always make effective use of assessment to shape curriculum planning. As a result, pupils do not always have the prior knowledge they need to build on. Teachers need to ensure that they have an accurate understanding of what pupils know and can do already in order to plan to build secure knowledge over time.  Teaching is not consistently ambitious for pupils. This means pupils do not learn as well as they could. Leaders need to ensure that teaching reflects the ambition of the intended curriculum by, for example, using appropriate activities that ensure pupils can achieve their potential.  Subject leadership is underdeveloped. As a result, leaders do not have a secure enough understanding of how well their curriculum areas are implemented. This hinders pupils’ learning. Leaders need to plan improvements with precision and then check they are leading to improvements in pupils’ learning.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the predecessor school, Frome Valley C of E VA First School, to be good in May 2013.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. 4 July 2023

p.3

4

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 4 July 2023

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 11 January 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school joined the Wessex Multi-Academy Trust in September 2022.  The on-site pre-school for two-, three- and four-year-olds became part of the school in September 2022.  The school does not use any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, special educational needs coordinator, curriculum leaders, teaching and support staff, two members of the local governing body and the chief executive officer of the trust. 4 July 2023

p.5

6

 The lead inspector met with the designated safeguarding leader to discuss how pupils are kept safe in school. Inspectors considered the school’s recruitment procedures, staff induction and training, records of concerns and their engagement with external agencies. They also spoke with staff and pupils throughout the inspection.  The lead inspector listened to pupils read to an adult.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school site. In addition, they met with pupils informally and formally to hear their views.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for parents, Ofsted Parent View, including free-text responses. Inspectors also took into consideration responses to the staff and pupil surveys.  Inspectors examined a range of documentation provided by the school, including the school’s self-evaluation document, improvement plan and documentation relating to

p.6

Inspection team

Angela Folland, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Sean Millar Ofsted Inspector 4 July 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion