Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Acorn Norfolk Limited in Norfolk

Inspected 20 Jul 2023 · published 26 Aug 2023 · URN 2673265

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Acorn Norfolk Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Jul 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Mark Anderton, Trudy Potter

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    2673265

  • URN verified

    2673265

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+48Positivemore positive than 63% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveexcellentstrong relationshipsgood progressclearambitiousindependenteffective
Criticismnot alwayslacklimitedunclearnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings949w+45
  • What needs to improve139w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,085
about usual (typical 1319)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 51
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection report for children’s home: 2673265 1 Registered provider: Acorn Norfolk Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The home provides care for up to two children who are on the autistic spectrum. It is operated by a national provider.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The home has not had a registered manager since 30 April 2023.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The home is in the grounds of a special school and other children’s homes that are all operated by the same national provider. The school is independently registered.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The inspectors only inspected the social care provision.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of last inspection: 6 September 2022

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

good

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2673265 2

p.1

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

06/09/2022 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2673265 3

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

At the time of the inspection, one child was living at the home. The child has established strong relationships with staff, who show skill in understanding their needs. The child has positive experiences, and receives support that enhances their quality of life and future opportunities.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child attends the on-site school. Staff continue to work on the child’s social skills and perception of others. This support has helped the child to move in to a larger class with peers. Staff have recently supported the child to complete their GCSE exams and attend the end-of-year prom. These are significant achievements for the child.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Parents have trust and confidence in the staff to advocate for their child’s best interests and well-being. Parents particularly highlighted the good progress that the child has made with cooking. The child has been proud to share these new skills at his family home.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child participates in a range of activities that meet their preferences. Staff provided good support for the child to use public transport. Recent visits to restaurants and the cinema provide meaningful experiences for the child to expand their interests. Staff are mindful of and sensitive to the child’s anxieties. Further work has been planned for the child to take part in an increased range of shared experiences with peers.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child has engaged in a range of specialist support from trained therapists. Play and art therapies have supported the child to explore their feelings and perspectives in a safe space.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child’s views are regularly gained and contribute to the day-to-day running of the home. Staff encourage high levels of participation through discussions and house meetings. The child’s placement plan is regularly reviewed by staff, and work has begun for the child to actively contribute to writing a personalised plan. This is an important area of development as, currently, it is unclear which aspects of the plan reflect the child’s views.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The child feels safe. Staff are clear about their roles and responsibilities in safeguarding the child. The staff have a good knowledge of the child’s additional vulnerabilities. Staff meetings are adapted to explore the individual safety needs of the child.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff have excellent working partnerships with other professionals, such as the police, social workers and school staff. When risks for the child emerged in relation Inspection report for children’s home: 2673265 4 to their increased vulnerability to exploitation, the success of these working relationships helped the child to be safer.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff help the child to develop personal safety strategies. Frequent and planned one- to-one discussions with the child cover important topics. These include online safety, mental health, positive well-being, understanding other people’s differences, and supporting healthy relationships. This has significantly improved the child’s emotional resilience and knowledge of their personal safety.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Managers have ensured that risk-management plans for the child are responsive and updated when additional risks are known. Although some risks have increased recently, staff have been proactive and responded to these in ways that reduce risks in accordance with the child’s plan.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff follow behaviour management strategies successfully. Staff have a good awareness of potential triggers for the child’s worries. This is combined with skilled de-escalation approaches to reduce difficult situations.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Consequential sanctions for the child are infrequent, restorative, and have been used appropriately. However, staff’s use of positive rewards still needs further development. Written plans around this strategy are not in place for staff, and the child is not always motivated to engage in planned life skills tasks. The lack of effective planning has hindered the child’s progress in this area of targeted work.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The home has not had a registered manager since April 2023. In the interim, a manager from another home in the organisation is working with the deputy manager. This manager is highly driven to provide good-quality outcomes for the child. Due to the effectiveness of the current management arrangements, the manager has been appointed permanently and is applying to register with Ofsted.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Managers understand the home’s strengths and areas for development, and have an ambitious vision to develop the care and support further. Managers lead by example and have an in-depth understanding of the needs of the child.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff receive regular reflective supervision sessions in line with home’s policy. The staff say that they feel well supported by managers, and this is further evidenced in the high levels of staff retention. This ensures that the child has good continuity of care.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff access a wide range of training. This equips staff with the skills that they need to meet the individual needs of the child. All staff have a relevant social care qualification. Managers have devised a clear training plan to further upskill staff, including an advanced autism awareness course. Staff said that their training opportunities demonstrate that managers value their ongoing professional development. Inspection report for children’s home: 2673265 5 External monitoring by an independent person provides a good level of scrutiny to improve the quality of care. However, the views of the child’s family are not regularly gained in these visits. Therefore, the additional safeguards intended are not always realised. Inspection report for children’s home: 2673265 6

p.4

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that the strategy around the use of consequential rewards is understood by staff and revised where appropriate. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 46, paragraph 9.34)  The registered person should make best use of information from independent monitoring. In particular, they should ensure that the independent person is supported to gain the views of parents more frequently. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 55, paragraph 10.24)  The registered person should ensure that staff are familiar with the home’s policies on record-keeping and understand the importance of careful and clear recording. In particular, ensure that the child’s placement plan clearly identifies when the child has stated their views. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 62, paragraph 14.4)

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2673265 7

p.6

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Acorn Norfolk Limited

p.7

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: 33 Roebuck Road, Hainault Business Park, Ilford IG6 3TZ

p.7

Inspectors

Mark Anderton, Social Care Inspector Trudy Potter, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2673265 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion