Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Stepping Stones of Sopley
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Stepping Stones of Sopley Committee
- Group reference verified
RP910548
- Inspection date verified
18 Jul 2023
- Inspectors verified
Lindsay Osman
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
BH23 8DD
- Name on report verified
Stepping Stones of Sopley
- URN verified
EY468225
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The weaknesses in the arrangements around suitability vetting mean that children's safety is compromised. p.3
- Significant weaknesses in safeguarding knowledge and practice compromise children's well-being. p.2
- This means they have poor attitudes to learning, with frequent occasions where children disrupt other children's play. p.2
- Supervision of children is not always good, as staff fail to ensure they have all children during transitions. p.3
- Behaviour is not consistently good due to the lack of stimulation. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health4
“Significant weaknesses in safeguarding knowledge and practice compromise children's well-being.” p.2Records & policies4
“Recruitment procedures are not robust.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 931
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Stepping Stones of Sopley Bransgore and Thorney Hill District Hall, Burnt House Lane, Christchurch, Hants BH23 8DD
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection GoodGood
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Significant weaknesses in safeguarding knowledge and practice compromise children's well-being. The committee members do not conduct risk assessments in relation to staff who do not have appropriate suitability checks in place. In addition, they cannot provide assurance that students and volunteers are suitable. This does not ensure children's safety.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children arrive happy and ready to learn. They are confident and independent. Children have access to a large outside area, where they run, climb and explore. This helps to develop their physical skills. However, staff do not provide an ambitious curriculum, nor do they plan to move children on to the next stage of their learning. As a result, children do not enjoy activities planned to meet their individual needs. Children flit from activity to activity, and they sometimes struggle to share and take care of the toys.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Behaviour is not consistently good due to the lack of stimulation. Children disrupt other children's learning by taking their belongings. Staff spend much of their time dealing with this behaviour. They chase children to retrieve the items taken, which limits the time they spend engaged in purposeful activities.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
All children, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not make the progress they are capable of due to the weakness in planning and behaviour management.
p.2
need to do better?
n The committee members do not fulfil their roles and responsibilities. There are significant weaknesses in the safeguarding requirements and quality of practice. Recruitment procedures are not robust. There are no risk assessments in place for staff who start without suitability checks. In addition, there is no evidence of suitability for students and volunteers. The very newly appointed manager and staff do not have a secure knowledge of safeguarding procedures. This impacts on children's safety and well-being. n There are systems for the supervision of staff. However, these are not effective. They do not ensure that staff understand their roles and responsibilities. Supervision does not address weaknesses in teaching. It does not provide staff with opportunities to develop through focused targets and training. As a result, they do not improve their teaching ability. n There are no systems in place to ensure that staff complete statutory
p.2
need to do better?
assessments. Progress checks for two-year olds are not always completed and shared with parents. This does not help staff to accurately assess where the children are in their development and what support they need to help them in
p.2
need to do better?
18 July 2023 their learning. n Overall, most children enjoy playing together. For example, children work together to create their 'chocolate cake' in the mud kitchen. They talk about searching for leaves, 'the biggest in the whole wide world', to add to their mix. Children make good friendships. However, due to weaknesses in teaching, not all children benefit from targeted support. This means they have poor attitudes to learning, with frequent occasions where children disrupt other children's play. n The manager demonstrates clear intentions for learning. However, staff do not understand how to implement the curriculum effectively or to make the best use of routines. For example, children experience large-group activities that have little impact on their learning. As a result, children become restless, and staff do not meet their emotional needs. In addition, transitions are not effective. Staff do not count children as they move rooms; consequently, not all children arrive
p.2
need to do better?
at the next activity. This means that children are not always supervised effectively. n Despite the weaknesses in the planning of activities, children enjoy role play. They pretend to get ready for bed and look for their slippers. Children return to the adults to inform them it is now morning, and they are getting up. Some children have a wide vocabulary and knowledge. For example, while exploring the tyres, children say, 'This is a car wheel as it is massive.' Others say that they think it is a motor bike wheel, and they chat freely to each other about their reasoning. n Staff build good relationships with parents, who appreciate the updates they receive. Parents comment that staff are amazing and that their children have made progress since starting. They say their children are well supported in their move to school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The weaknesses in the arrangements around suitability vetting mean that children's safety is compromised. The manager and staff have completed safeguarding training. However, they do not have a secure understanding of the procedures to follow regarding the welfare of children. In addition, they are unsure of the process if they have concerns about adults or volunteers. This does not safeguard children. Supervision of children is not always good, as staff fail to ensure they have all children during transitions. There is a strong focus on ensuring the building is secure to prevent anyone from gaining unauthorised access.
p.3
Due date
ensure all staff and volunteers are suitable and risk assessments are in place when suitability checks are not complete 01/08/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure the designated safeguarding lead and all staff have secure knowledge of safeguarding procedures 01/08/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure supervision is effective to help staff support children's individual needs and raise the quality of teaching to a good level 01/08/2023
p.4
Due date
implement effective behaviour management strategies to ensure the safety and well-being of all children. 01/08/2023
p.4
Due date
improve the organisation of group times to ensure that children have their needs met and transitions are effective and well managed 15/08/2023
p.4
Due date
create and implement a suitably challenging curriculum that reflects children's individual learning needs 15/08/2023
p.4
Due date
implement effective systems to ensure progress checks for two-year olds are completed and shared with parents. 15/08/2023
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY468225 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 10302504 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Full day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 30 Number of children on roll 32 Name of registered person Stepping Stones of Sopley Committee
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 01425 673135 Date of previous inspection 18 October 201918 October 2019
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Stepping Stones of Sopley is a committee-managed childcare setting that re- registered in its new premises in 2013. It operates from the Thornley Hill District Hall, in the village of Bransgore, Hampshire. The setting operates weekdays, from 8am to 6pm, for most of the year. The setting receives funding for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years. There are four members of staff who work with the children, including the manager. Of these, three hold an early years qualification at level 3, and one holds a qualification at level 2.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n The manager joined the inspector on a learning walk and talked to the inspector about their curriculum and what they want their children to learn. n Children communicated with the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector spoke with the nominated individual about the leadership and management of the setting. n The special educational needs coordinator spoke to the inspector about how they support children with SEND. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning.
p.6
Inspection activities
n The inspector carried out a joint observation of a group activity with the manager. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
18 July 2023 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion