Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Norto5 KIDZ Academy - Cuckfield
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
31 Jul 2023
- URN verified
EY490861
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 285
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, where you can find at
p.1
Summary of outcome
www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2.
p.1
Summary of outcome
If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On the 6 July 2023, we carried out an inspection and found a provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions a provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On the 31 July 2023, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider responded to the actions set. We found the provider has improved supervision arrangements to align training and support for staff. This is to help them have a clearer understanding in how to fulfil their roles and responsibilities. Key person arrangements have been reviewed to ensure all children have their individual needs considered and met. Managers ensure that staff consider risk assessment when carrying out activities and experiences so children remain safe at all times.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion