Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christine Bulmer (lead), Dale Burr

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christine Bulmer, Dale Burr

  • Postcode verified

    BA3 2UD

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh-qualitystronghigh expectationspositiveexcellenthighly effectiveimproved
Criticismvariablerequires improvementconcernsyet todeclinepersistently absentsuspensionslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipSafeguardingWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1059w+60
  • Leadership510w+85
  • Safeguarding255w+70
  • What needs to improve575w+15

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,399
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%Leadership 21%Safeguarding 11%What needs to improve 24%

Full report text

Alun Williams, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Stuart Warrener, Chair of the Board of Trustees Midsomer Norton Schools Partnership Norton Hill Primary School Silver Street Midsomer Norton BA3 2UD

p.1

Summary evaluation of Midsomer Norton Schools Partnership

Following the summary evaluation of Midsomer Norton Schools Partnership (or ‘the trust’) in June 2023, when I was accompanied by Mary Davies and Christine Bulmer, Ofsted Inspectors, I am writing on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI) of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings.

p.1

Summary evaluation of Midsomer Norton Schools Partnership

The summary evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the operational note.

p.1

Summary evaluation of Midsomer Norton Schools Partnership

Thank you for your cooperation during our visit to the trust between Monday 19 June and Thursday 22 June 2023. Please pass on our thanks to your staff and other stakeholders who kindly gave up their time to meet us.

p.1

Summary evaluation of Midsomer Norton Schools Partnership

The findings from the summary evaluation and any recommendations for improvement are set out within this outcome letter.

p.1

Context

The trust consists of 17 primary schools, 10 secondary schools including one with boarding provision, and one special school. The schools are located in Bath and North East Somerset, Somerset and North Somerset. The trust was established in 2013.

p.1

Context

The trust’s primary schools vary in size from approximately 34 pupils in Hemington Primary School to 482 in Peasedown St John Primary School. The trust’s secondary Ofsted

p.1

Context

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 MAT@ofsted.gov.uk www.gov.uk.ofsted schools range from 136 pupils in Somerset Studio Academy to 1,851 pupils in Norton Hill Academy.

p.1

Context

The trust has nine schools with a faith character.

p.2

Context

The trust board is made up of 11 trustees. This group is responsible for the strategic oversight and performance of the trust and its schools.

p.2

Context

Currently, the inspection outcomes for the trust’s schools, including the most recent inspections, are as follows:

p.2

Context

◼ 18 schools are judged to be good ◼ One school is judged to require improvement ◼ Nine schools have yet to be inspected since joining the trust.

p.2

Summary of stage 1

At stage 1 of this summary evaluation, 10 schools were inspected from September 2022 to April 2023. All these inspections were routine inspections and carried out under either section 5 or 8 of the Education Act 2005 (the Act), as amended.

p.2

Summary of stage 1

◼ Four schools received a graded inspection. Two schools improved from requires improvement to good. Two schools retained their grading of good. ◼ Six schools received an ungraded inspection. Four schools continued to be good. One school continued to be good with evidence of improved performance and one school continued to be good with evidence of a decline in performance.

p.2

Summary of stage 2

Over the course of the on-site visit to the trust, discussions were held with you, other trust leaders and operational staff. We met with one member and three representatives of the board of trustees. We visited seven trust schools that had not been inspected during stage 1 of the summary evaluation process. In each of these schools, we met with the headteacher, other school leaders and representatives of the local governing board. Inspectors also conducted telephone surveys with 11 headteachers of other schools in the trust.

p.2

Impact of the trust on its schools – Quality of Education

◼ Midsomer Norton Schools Partnership is a high-performing trust. The centrally planned curriculum is well organised and sequenced for primary and secondary phases. Trust leaders allow schools the freedom to adapt the curriculum to suit their individual contexts. They keep close oversight to ensure that all pupils are making the progress they should. School leaders in all phases value the centralised approach. They recognise how this supports the development of expertise and collaboration across schools. The curriculum is having a positive impact of the outcomes of pupils at all phases. It prepares them very well for the next stage in their education, employment or training.

p.3

Impact of the trust on its schools – Quality of Education

◼ Reading is a top priority for the trust. Trust leaders have ensured that staff in all phases know how to teach phonics effectively. Regular checks of reading in schools, coupled with a forensic use of assessment, allow trust leaders to pinpoint where improvements are needed. Across all phases, disadvantaged pupils make significant improvements in reading. Published outcomes for English and reading are above the national averages.

p.3

Impact of the trust on its schools – Quality of Education

◼ In many subjects, the trust has implemented a model where subject leaders facilitate high-quality development through networks of colleagues. School leaders and staff speak highly of these network groups. Primary staff, for instance, appreciate the opportunity to learn from secondary experts in other schools. However, leaders identify that the network groups are not well established in a few subject areas in the primary phase. Consequently, the level of staff subject-specific knowledge in these areas is more variable than in others.

p.3

Impact of the trust on its schools – Quality of Education

◼ The trust is growing and welcoming new specialist and alternative provision schools. Trust leaders recognise the need to establish appropriate structures to support their operational and strategic work. This is essential to ensure a continued focus on high-quality education for all pupils.

p.3

Impact of the trust on its schools – Behaviour and Attitudes

◼ Trust leaders have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. These are shared by staff across schools. Central policies and systems help schools create a culture where excellent behaviour and regular attendance matter. School leaders adjust these policies and systems to ensure that they are suitable for their schools’ context and age groups.

p.3

Impact of the trust on its schools – Behaviour and Attitudes

◼ Trust leaders actively monitor pupils’ behaviour as part of their routine visits to schools. For example, they track incidents of inappropriate behaviour and investigate any patterns or trends. Where they identify areas that need fixing, trust leaders provide effective support and clearly define the boundaries to secure rapid progress. As a result, pupils’ behaviour improves over time.

p.3

Impact of the trust on its schools – Behaviour and Attitudes

◼ Schools take a proactive approach to teaching and demonstrating what good behaviour looks like. Pupils are clear about expectations and understand why they are important. In some cases, the trust has provided material support to help school leaders ‘reset’ the culture, such as buying new uniforms. They have also provided funding for parent support assistants to work with families, particularly where attendance is an issue. Consequently, leaders’ actions have reduced the number of pupils who are persistently absent.

p.4

Impact of the trust on its schools – Behaviour and Attitudes

◼ Schools inspected in stage 1 of the summary evaluation received good or outstanding judgements for behaviour and attitudes. However, trust leaders are not complacent. They acknowledge the ongoing need to reduce suspensions and improve attendance further, especially for a minority of disadvantaged pupils and for boys. Nonetheless, they have effective systems and processes in place to maintain the upward trajectory of improvement.

p.4

Impact of the trust on its schools – Leadership and Management

◼ School improvement is at the core of trust leaders' work. Under the skilled guidance of the CEO, they embody an unwavering dedication to securing the best outcomes for pupils. Trust leaders have developed a rigorous and effective model for school improvement that aligns with the trust vision. They strategically target support to schools where it is most needed. For example, schools that need to improve receive extra help from trust leaders and external partners. This approach to school improvement has yielded positive results. The trust boasts an impressive track record of supporting schools to enhance their performance over time.

p.4

Impact of the trust on its schools – Leadership and Management

◼ A culture of high expectations and ambition permeates all aspects of trust leaders’ work. Lines of accountability within the trust structure are well defined. For example, trust leaders hold headteachers responsible for their performance through school monitoring visits, target setting and appraisal systems. School leaders view this process as collaborative and an integral part of the ‘improvement culture’.

p.4

Impact of the trust on its schools – Leadership and Management

◼ Trust leaders invest in staff development. They have created a strong professional development offer. Trust leaders meticulously plan their strategy based on trust and school priorities. They quickly identify staff with leadership potential and support them to achieve nationally recognised qualifications. ◼ There is a trust-wide approach to staff workload and well-being. For example, centralised systems, such as human resources and finance, enable school leaders to focus on improving the quality of education. Trust leaders consult with staff on policies such as assessment to ensure that workload is manageable. Consequently, staff turnover and absences within the trust are low.

p.4

Impact of the trust on its schools – Governance

◼ Governance is highly effective. Trust leaders work with a strong sense of moral purpose and in the best interests of pupils. There is a shared commitment to achieving excellence. Trustees, trust leaders and local governors articulate a clear and straightforward vision: ‘a determination that all children should be able to attend a good or better school’. This guides their actions and is fully understood and embraced by all.

p.5

Impact of the trust on its schools – Governance

◼ Trust leaders ensure that effective systems are in place for trustees and governors to do their job well. For example, they provide them with ‘notes of visits’ from monitoring so they can track schools’ progress. Trust leaders promote open and transparent communication. A dedicated chairs' group provides local governors with a forum to question and challenge the systems in place.

p.5

Impact of the trust on its schools – Governance

◼ Trustees bring a high level of expertise to their positions. They regularly review their skills to ensure that the trust has the right people with the necessary skills on board. Trustees are proactive in helping local governors understand their roles and responsibilities. For example, they attend meetings and scrutinise minutes to ensure effective governance. Trustees and governors fulfil their statutory obligations well.

p.5

Impact of the trust on its schools – Governance

◼ Trust leaders and trustees have a clear and accurate understanding of the trust’s financial and compliance position. They manage finances and resources astutely to secure improvements in pupils’ outcomes.

p.5

Impact of the trust on its schools – Governance

◼ Members receive the information they need to assure themselves of the effectiveness of the trust's governance. They have confidence in the trust's leadership, including its growth strategy.

p.5

Safeguarding

◼ Trust leaders place a very high priority on safeguarding. They have implemented high-quality training for school staff, governors and trustees. This gives leaders the knowledge they need to carry out their duties effectively. Through regular quizzes, trust and school leaders test the impact of training, which helps shape future trust-wide professional development plans.

p.5

Safeguarding

◼ Trust leaders have set up a designated safeguarding lead (DSL) steering group. This DSL group meet regularly to share best practice and plan strategic priorities across the trust. For example, they have recently prepared training based on the amendments to Keeping Children Safe in Education 2023, including updated guidance on internet filtering systems.

p.6

Safeguarding

◼ Trustees, including governors, review safeguarding policies at least annually. They ensure alignment with other policies and statutory guidance. Trustees receive a ‘one-page safeguarding update’ for each school. They use this information to challenge the safeguarding culture and understand the impact of policies and systems.

p.6

Safeguarding

◼ The trust has developed a curriculum that equips pupils with age-appropriate knowledge and understanding of safeguarding topics. The trust’s approach to safeguarding aims to educate and empower pupils to keep themselves and others safe. For example, where necessary, external partners deliver sessions on subjects such as knife crime.

p.6

Safeguarding

◼ Ofsted reports for the 10 trust schools inspected in stage 1 of the summary evaluation confirmed the presence of a strong safeguarding culture. The reports highlighted that ‘staff understand the importance of safeguarding’, and ‘are confident in identifying and reporting concerns’. Many reports also acknowledge how ‘governors have effective oversight of safeguarding’.

p.6

Recommendations

◼ The trust is entering a new phase of expansion. Consequently, it is considering ways to maximise the positive impact of development, especially through the growth of specialist and alternative provisions. Trust leaders, including trustees, should ensure that there are appropriate structures to support the operational and strategic work across all schools as the trust changes and evolves.

p.6

Recommendations

◼ Trust leaders identify that the staff development programme is not as well established in a few subjects in the primary phase. As a result, the level of staff subject-specific expertise is variable. Trust leaders should continue their programme of staff development to expand existing effective practice across all subject areas in the primary phase. I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State for Education and the applicable Department for Education (DfE) regional director. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.6

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

School Information Most recent inspection URN School name Local Authority Date joined trust Does the inspection relate to the school in its current form? Inspection date OE grade

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

137548 Writhlington School Bath and North East Somerset 2019-04-01 Yes 2019-05-15 3

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

136966 Hayesfield Girls School Bath and North East Somerset 2021-04-01 Yes 2022-11-15 2

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

141767 Clutton Primary School Bath and North East Somerset 2015-03-01 Yes 2018-01-10 2

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

146409 Westfield Primary School Bath and North East Somerset 2018-10-01 Yes 2023-01-25 2

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

147173 Peasedown St John Primary School Bath and North East Somerset 2019-04-01 No 2019-01-16 4

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

146396 St Julian's Church School Bath and North East Somerset 2018-12-01 Yes 2023-04-19 2

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

136894 Preston School Academy Somerset 2022-02-01 Yes 2023-01-11 2

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

142941 Welton Primary School Bath and North East Somerset 2016-07-01 Yes 2019-06-26 2

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

142942 Longvernal Primary School Bath and North East Somerset 2016-07-01 Yes 2023-02-03 2

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

136335 Norton Hill Academy Bath and North East Somerset 2010-10-01 Yes 2023-03-21 2

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

146424 Shoscombe Church School Bath and North East Somerset 2018-12-01 Yes 2023-05-04 2

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

146972 Beechen Cliff School Bath and North East Somerset 2019-02-01 No 2018-05-23 4

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

147890 St Mary's CofE Primary School Bath and North East Somerset 2020-05-01 No 2019-09-25 4

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

147126 Critchill Special School Somerset 2019-06-01 No 2014-09-18 2

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

146069 Hemington Primary School Somerset 2018-08-01 Yes 2022-09-23 2 School Information Most recent inspection URN School name Local Authority Date joined trust Does the inspection relate to the school in its current form? Inspection date OE grade

p.8

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

144281 Farrington Gurney Church of England Primary School Bath and North East Somerset 2017-04-01 Yes 2020-01-28 2

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

144830 Midsomer Norton Primary School Bath and North East Somerset 2017-09-01 Yes 2022-02-01 2

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

136311 Somervale Secondary School Bath and North East Somerset 2010-10-01 Yes 2022-06-28 2

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

142125 Somerset Studio School Bath and North East Somerset 2019-04-01 No 2018-03-16 2

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

137202 St Dunstan's School Somerset 2016-06-01 Yes 2018-07-18 2

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

140452 St John's CofE Primary School Bath and North East Somerset 2018-12-01 Yes 2023-03-29 2

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

136804 Trinity Church School Bath and North East Somerset 2016-06-01 Yes 2018-05-10 2

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

143915 Norton Hill Primary School Bath and North East Somerset 2020-09-01 N/A New school N/A

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

145021 Dundry Church of England Primary School North Somerset 2016-06-01 Yes 2022-12-07 2

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

147801 St Mark's CofE School Bath and North East Somerset 2020-05-01 Yes 2022-02-09 2

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

141149 High Littleton CofE VC Primary School Bath and North East Somerset 2014-08-01 No 2014-01-24 1

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

146447 Leigh On Mendip School Somerset 2018-11-01 No 2010-05-19 1

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

148830 Buckler's Mead School Somerset 2021-09-01 No 2019-11-13 4

p.9

Annex: Schools that are part of the trust

*Schools highlighted received either a graded, ungraded or monitoring inspection in stage 1 of the MAT SE

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion