Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
The Japanese School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
8 Jun 2023
- Inspectors verified
David Radomsky, Katerina Christodoulou, Sarah Murphy
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Outstanding
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Outstanding
- Postcode verified
W3 9PU
- Name on report verified
The Japanese School
- URN verified
101958
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2021.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesOutstanding
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationOutstanding
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They also have high expectations for pupils’ behaviour, guiding pupils on how to behave with integrity, as well as how to make a positive contribution to society. p.2
- Pupils achieve exceptionally well and acquire detailed knowledge in the broad range of subjects studied. p.2
- – 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and p.12
- As a result, pupils achieve very well across the subjects. 6 to 8 June 2023 Leaders take advantage of the many things on offer in London to enrich and deepen pupils’ learning. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Consequently, leaders’ approach to ensuring that pupils are kept safe from potential harm is not effective. p.2
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.4
- Recruitment processes for vetting new staff’s suitability to work with pupils are weak. p.4
- Because of this, staff are unable to be alert to all of the signs that may indicate a pupil may be at risk. p.5
- All of this means that leaders’ oversight of the school’s compliance with requirements is poor. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Should they have any concerns, pupils know they can approach a trusted member of staff who will readily help them. p.2
- the knowledge they need to be vigilant to all types of potential safeguarding concerns. p.5
- Much thought has gone into what knowledge pupils must learn across subjects. p.2
- Curriculum thinking lays out step by step the chunks of knowledge that need to be taught. p.2
- The school does not comply with the requirements for independent schools that all members of the proprietor body must have a DBS check. p.4
- In addition, the school does not comply with the requirement that independent schools must undertake and record details of the section 128 checks for those in management positions. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 13
- Words of findings
- 3,126
- longer than usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of The Japanese School 87 Creffield Road, Acton, London W3 9PU
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Outstanding Behaviour and attitudes Outstanding Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
Does the school meet the independent school standards?
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have not followed statutory guidance when appointing new staff to the school. Staff do not have a secure enough understanding of some of the key risks to which pupils may be vulnerable. Consequently, leaders’ approach to ensuring that pupils are kept safe from potential harm is not effective.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Conversely, leaders are determined to provide pupils with a highly ambitious curriculum. Pupils achieve exceptionally well and acquire detailed knowledge in the broad range of subjects studied. Leaders provide many enrichment opportunities to support pupils’ personal development. They also have high expectations for pupils’ behaviour, guiding pupils on how to behave with integrity, as well as how to make a positive contribution to society. All of leaders’ ambitions for the quality of education and pupils’ conduct are realised consistently.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy coming to school. This is reflected in their very high rates of attendance. Pupils are kind towards others and go out of their way to support their peers, including when new pupils join the school. They welcome new pupils warmly because many pupils remember what it was like for themselves not so long ago. Any misbehaviours, including bullying, are a rarity. Should they have any concerns, pupils know they can approach a trusted member of staff who will readily help them.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils value and are proud of their school. This is demonstrated by the conscientious manner in which they all help out with keeping the school clean and tidy every day.
p.2
better?
The proprietor body and school leaders have not ensured that the school’s arrangements for safeguarding are effective. They have also not ensured compliance with all the independent school standards.
p.2
better?
Leaders provide pupils with a broad and highly ambitious curriculum. Much thought has gone into what knowledge pupils must learn across subjects. Curriculum thinking lays out step by step the chunks of knowledge that need to be taught.
p.2
better?
Teachers have extensive expertise in their subjects. They also know how to teach subject content so that pupils understand and remember it. Leaders ensure that a range of high-quality resources are available to support the delivery of the curriculum. This helps teachers to present new knowledge clearly.
p.2
better?
Leaders have developed suitable systems for identifying and supporting the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Teachers keep a close eye on the development of pupils’ understanding, addressing misconceptions and giving extra support to pupils who fall behind. Teachers also create many opportunities for pupils to revise prior learning. This assists pupils in embedding key knowledge in their long-term memories. As a result, pupils achieve very well across the subjects. 6 to 8 June 2023 Leaders take advantage of the many things on offer in London to enrich and deepen pupils’ learning. They also arrange educational journeys across the UK, such as to Scotland. These are planned carefully to expand pupils’ experiences and cultural capital. Opportunities for pupils to develop and nurture their talents and interests are prioritised. For example, staff in the art department arrange an annual sketching
p.2
better?
competition for all pupils. Groups of pupils spend the day visiting and sketching at significant places of interest, including, for example, in stately homes, on Tower Bridge and at London Zoo. The winners have their work framed and exhibited. In addition, the school has begun to submit pupils’ artwork to the Royal Academy of Arts
p.3
better?
Pupils who join the school tend to be at the very early stages of speaking English as an additional language. Leaders make it a priority to deliver a comprehensive and aspirational English curriculum. Staff are well trained and have the necessary expertise to support pupils to build up their knowledge effectively. They deliver a well-considered and precisely sequenced curriculum. The teaching of reading is a priority from the start, including the use of phonics to ensure that pupils can decode words accurately and fluently. As pupils progress through the school, they become fluent and confident readers in English. This is in addition to their confidence and fluency in reading Japanese. Within the English programme, pupils learn conversational English, writing, spelling and listening skills. Staff also enter pupils’ writing in English into national writing competitions. Some pupils have had their written submissions published.
p.3
better?
The atmosphere in classrooms is underpinned by a very strong culture of ambition. It is expected and routine among pupils to strive to achieve well. As a result, they engage fully in their lessons and even low-level disruption is rare. These attitudes play a major role in pupils’ academic success.
p.3
better?
Leaders provide pupils with a variety of enrichment opportunities. These include many cultural visits and a range of sporting and musical clubs. The personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education programme is well thought through. It teaches pupils about a range of relevant topics to support their understanding of wider society. For example, when teaching pupils about how the government works in Japan, they are also taught about democracy in Great Britain. Pupils are taught to respect people with protected characteristics, and they learn about different faiths and cultures. Secondary pupils particularly value their lessons on the Abrahamic religions. The approach to providing pupils with relationships and sex education gives due regard to the statutory guidance.
p.3
better?
Across the school, pupils take on a range of leadership responsibilities. For example, the environmental committee designed and planted a welcome garden at the school entrance. Leaders provide pupils with useful careers guidance. Pupils also have opportunities to undertake work experience.
p.3
better?
Staff said that leaders help them to have a reasonable work–life balance.
p.3
better?
The proprietor body and senior school leaders have very little understanding of their 6 to 8 June 2023 statutory duties. This is particularly in relation to the independent school standards and safeguarding. Leadership arrangements mean that senior school leaders and trustees change regularly. For example, senior staff arrive from Japan, and in a matter of a couple of years, return and are replaced by other, new leaders. Trustees also rotate often. The proprietor body has not made suitable provisions to ensure continuity in leadership’s oversight of the school, including checking the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements. For example, no strategy or procedures are in place for an effective and informative handover when senior leaders change. Incoming leaders do not make themselves knowledgeable quickly about their statutory duties in relation to independent schools in England.
p.3
better?
Some unmet independent school standards were addressed quickly by leaders during the inspection. However, there remain several unmet independent school standards, both in relation to safeguarding and arrangements for managing complaints. The proprietor body has not put in place any mechanisms to ensure and assure themselves that all the independent school standards are met securely and consistently.
p.4
better?
The school complies with schedule 10 of the Equality Act 2010
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.4
Safeguarding
Recruitment processes for vetting new staff’s suitability to work with pupils are weak. Several of the required checks on leaders’ and staff’s suitability to work with pupils have not been carried out. For example, leaders have not ensured that Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks have been completed for all new members of staff, particularly those who arrive from overseas. Additionally, leaders have not complied with the statutory requirements for schools to obtain a separate barred list check if a member of staff works with pupils before a DBS certificate is available. Statutory prohibition from teaching checks have not been carried out.
p.4
Safeguarding
Arrangements for checking the suitability of members of the proprietor body are also unsuitable. The school does not comply with the requirements for independent schools that all members of the proprietor body must have a DBS check. In addition, the school does not comply with the requirement that independent schools must undertake and record details of the section 128 checks for those in management positions.
p.4
Safeguarding
Leaders have not done enough to make sure that staff are knowledgeable about the latest statutory guidance. Safeguarding leaders have read but not undertaken specific training on the latest version of statutory safeguarding guidance.
p.4
Safeguarding
Staff know the school’s procedures for reporting concerns and said that they would follow this. However, their understanding of the different types of risks that pupils may face is not well developed. Staff have received a translation of the latest statutory safeguarding guidance, but they have not had specific training to ensure 6 to 8 June 2023 that they understand and can act on its key messages. They have a limited grasp of some of the key risks, including, for example, online bullying and exploitation.
p.4
Safeguarding
Pupils said that if they had any concerns, they would tell a trusted member of staff who would help them. Through the curriculum, pupils are taught about risk and how to keep themselves safe. This includes sessions on drug and alcohol abuse, mental health and online safety. Pupils are also taught how to form healthy relationships and the principles of consent.
p.5
Safeguarding
The school’s safeguarding policy is published on its website and refers to current statutory guidance.
p.5
(information for the school and proprietor)
Leaders do not routinely follow statutory guidance for checking the suitability of staff who apply to work at the school. Additionally, statutory guidance is not consistently followed for checks on the suitability of members of the proprietor body. This puts pupils at potential risk. Leaders should ensure that they familiarise themselves with statutory guidance, and as a matter of urgency, make all the required checks for all staff and, as appropriate, for members of the proprietor body. Leaders have not made sure that they and staff are knowledgeable about the latest statutory safeguarding guidance and in particular, the different types of risks that pupils may face. Because of this, staff are unable to be alert to all of the signs that may indicate a pupil may be at risk. Leaders should ensure that they take the necessary action to secure their full understanding of statutory guidance, including any relevant updates. In turn, they should also ensure that staff gain
p.5
(information for the school and proprietor)
the knowledge they need to be vigilant to all types of potential safeguarding concerns. The proprietor body does not ensure that members of the proprietor body and school leaders have the necessary expertise and knowledge to make sure that the school complies consistently with all of the independent school standards. They have not established suitable and effective arrangements for sharing key information, including in relation to safeguarding, when leaders arrive from or return to Japan. Leaders, including the proprietor body, have also not ensured that they familiarise themselves quickly with their statutory duties and the requirements of being registered as a school in England. All of this means that leaders’ oversight of the school’s compliance with requirements is poor. The proprietor body should put in place suitable procedures for ensuring and assuring themselves of consistent compliance with the independent school standards,
p.5
(information for the school and proprietor)
including appropriate and securely established arrangements for the sharing of knowledge and expertise every time that leaders and members of the proprietor body change. 6 to 8 June 2023
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.6
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 6 to 8 June 2023
p.6
School details
Website www.thejapaneseschool.ltd.uk/nihonjinga kko Email address okamoto-k@thejapaneseschool.ltd.uk
p.7
School details
Date of previous inspection 13 to 15 July 2021 6 to 8 June 2023
p.7
Information about this school
The Japanese School provides for the children of expatriates who are working in London for a temporary and limited period until they return to Japan. The school is partially funded by the Japanese government. The senior leadership team and most teachers come from Japan and work in this school for two to three years before returning to Japan. The proprietor body comprises a group of Japanese companies. The proprietor board members are representatives of these companies who are currently working in the UK. Employees of different companies take on this role on an annual rotation basis. The school follows the Japanese national curriculum, supplemented by aspects of the English national curriculum. Almost all teaching is in Japanese, which is spoken by staff and pupils. The Japanese academic year starts in April. The school’s last full standard inspection was in December 2021. Subsequently, there was a progress monitoring inspection in April 2022.
p.8
Information about this school
The current headteacher and school administrative secretary took up their posts in April 2022. The current deputy headteacher started in April 2023. The current chair of the proprietor body took up her post from the start of June 2023, having arrived in London a month earlier. She is the third chair of the proprietor body in the past year. Most of the current trustees of the proprietor body are very new to post. This means that most teachers, all senior leaders and trustees are different to those who were present at the time of the last standard inspection. Leaders do not make use of alternative provision.
p.8
Information about this inspection
Inspectors carried out this inspection under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008. The purpose of the inspection is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.8
Information about this inspection
The school has failed to meet the independent school standards. These are the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014.
p.8
Information about this inspection
Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.
p.8
Information about this inspection
Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, including early reading, mathematics, physical education and PSHE education. Inspectors held discussions with leaders and teachers, visited lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work and held discussions with pupils. Inspectors also considered other subjects as part of the inspection. Inspectors spoke with the headteacher, other senior leaders and the chair of the 6 to 8 June 2023 proprietor body and five other trustees. They also spoke with leaders responsible for safeguarding and health and safety. Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation, including information related to safeguarding and the checks carried out before the appointment of staff. Inspectors looked at records of pupils’ behaviour. Inspectors scrutinised a range of information and toured the school site to check compliance with the independent school standards. Inspectors had formal meetings with staff and with pupils. They took account of
p.8
Information about this inspection
the responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View. They also considered the responses to the staff and pupil surveys.
p.9
Inspection team
David Radomsky, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.9
Inspection team
Sarah Murphy His Majesty’s Inspector 6 to 8 June 2023
p.9
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
7 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that-
p.10
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
– 7(a) arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and
p.10
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
– 7(b) such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
18(2) The standard in this paragraph is met if-
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 18(2)(a) no such person is barred from regulated activity relating to children in accordance with section 3(2) of the 2006 Act where that person is or will be engaging in activity which is regulated activity within the meaning of Part 1 of Schedule 4 to that Act;
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 18(2)(b) no such person carries out work, or intends to carry out work, at the school in contravention of a prohibition order, an interim prohibition order, or any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act, or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in either such direction;
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 18(2)(d) the proprietor ensures that, where relevant to any such person, an enhanced criminal record check is made in respect of that person and an enhanced criminal record certificate is obtained before or as soon as practicable after that person’s appointment.
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
20(6) The standard in this paragraph is met in relation to an individual ("MB"), not being the Chair of the school, who is a member of a body of persons corporate or unincorporate named as the proprietor of the school in the register or in an application to enter the school in the register, if-
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 20(6)(a)(i) is not barred from regulated activity relating to children in accordance with section 3(2) of the 2006 Act where that individual is or will be engaging in activity which is regulated activity within the meaning of Part 1 of Schedule 4 of that Act; and
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 20(6)(a)(ii) does not carry out work, or intend to carry out work, at the school in contravention of a prohibition order, an interim prohibition order, or any direction 6 to 8 June 2023 made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in either such direction;
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 20(6)(b) subject to sub-paragraphs (7) to (8), the Chair of the school makes the following checks relating to MB-
p.11
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 20(6)(b)(i) where relevant to the individual, an enhanced criminal record check.
p.11
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
21(1) The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor keeps a register which shows such of the information referred to in sub-paragraphs (3) to (7) as is applicable to the school in question.
p.11
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
21(3) The information referred to in this sub-paragraph is-
p.11
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 21(3)(a) in relation to each member of staff ("S") appointed on or after 1st May 2007, whether-
p.11
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 21(3)(a)(ii) a check was made to establish whether S is barred from regulated activity relating to children in accordance with section 3(2) of the 2006 Act;
p.11
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 21(3)(a)(iii) a check was made to establish whether S is subject to any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in such a direction;
p.11
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 21(3)(a)(v) an enhanced criminal record certificate was obtained in respect of S;
p.11
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 21(3)(a)(vi) checks were made pursuant to paragraph 18(2)(d);
p.11
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 21(3)(b) in relation to each member of staff ("S"), whether a check was made to establish whether S is subject to a prohibition order or an interim prohibition order, including the date on which such check was completed.
p.11
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
21(4) The information referred to in this sub-paragraph is, in relation to each member of staff in post on 1st August 2007 who was appointed at any time before 1st May 2007, whether each check referred to in sub-paragraph (3) was made and whether an enhanced criminal record certificate was obtained, together with the date on which any check was completed or certificate obtained.
p.11
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
21(6) The information referred to in this sub-paragraph is, in relation each member ("MB") of a body of persons named as the proprietor appointed on or after 1st May 2007, whether the checks referred to in paragraph 20(6)(b) were made, the date they were made and the date on which the resulting certificate was obtained. 6 to 8 June 2023
p.11
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled
33 The standard about the manner in which complaints are handled is met if the proprietor ensures that a complaints procedure is drawn up and effectively implemented which deals with the handling of complaints from parents of pupils and which-
p.12
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled
– 33(f) where the parent is not satisfied with the response to the complaint made in accordance with sub-paragraph (e), makes provision for a hearing before a panel appointed by or on behalf of the proprietor and consisting of at least three people who were not directly involved in the matters detailed in the complaint;
p.12
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled
– 33(g) ensures that, where there is a panel hearing of a complaint, one panel member is independent of the management and running of the school;
p.12
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled
– 33(i) provides for the panel to make findings and recommendations and stipulates that a copy of those findings and recommendations is-
p.12
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled
– 33(i)(i) provided to the complainant and, where relevant, the person complained about; and
p.12
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled
– 33(j) provides for a written record to be kept of all complaints that are made in accordance with sub-paragraph (e) and-
p.12
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled
– 33(j)(i) whether they are resolved following a formal procedure, or proceed to a panel hearing; and
p.12
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled
– 33(j)(ii) action taken by the school as a result of those complaints (regardless of whether they are upheld); and
p.12
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled
– 33(k) provides that correspondence, statements and records relating to individual complaints are to be kept confidential except where the Secretary of State or a body conducting an inspection under section 109 of the 2008 Act requests access to them.
p.12
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school-
p.12
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
– 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently;
p.12
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
– 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and
p.12
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
– 34(1)(c) actively promote the well-being of pupils. 6 to 8 June 2023 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.13
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.13
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.13
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.13
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion