Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

The National Church of England Junior School, Grantham

Inspected — · published 19 Jul 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rakesh Patel

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Rakesh Patel

  • Postcode verified

    NG31 6SR

  • Name on report verified

    The National Church of England Junior School, Grantham

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+31Mostly positivemore positive than 66% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveconsistentlystrongambitiousstrengthlovepositive
Criticismrequires improvementlacksnot alwaysnot high qualitynot yetpersistently absentnot consistentlynot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings905w+26
  • What needs to improve57w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
960
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 94%What needs to improve 6%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Gareth Smith Executive Principal The National Church of England Junior School, Grantham Castlegate Grantham Lincolnshire NG31 6SR

p.1

England Junior School, Grantham

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 12 June 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

England Junior School, Grantham

During the inspection, I discussed with you, the head of school and representatives of the trust the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also carried out other activities, including visiting lessons, meeting with the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo), speaking to pupils, speaking to subject leaders, and scrutinising documents and work. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

improvement. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more

work is necessary for the school to become good.

p.1

improvement. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more

The school should take further action to:

p.1

improvement. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more

 ensure that teachers deliver the curriculum in foundation subjects consistently and effectively to ensure that pupils know and remember more of it.  develop opportunities explicitly for pupils to gain a better understanding of different faiths, cultures and British values.

p.1

Main findings

There have been significant changes to leadership at all levels since the last inspection. The local board of trustees has been replaced by the interim local board. This is chaired by trust executives. The interim local board is holding school leaders to account more effectively. You took up your position as the executive principal in September 2022. You appointed a new head of school in December 2022. You have also appointed a new SENCo to the school’s leadership team.

p.2

Main findings

Plans that set out the knowledge that pupils should learn are now firmly in place for all subjects. The curriculum is broad and pupils are now beginning to remember more of it. The strength in delivery is clear to see in core subjects, where pupils are beginning to benefit from a depth of learning. You have appointed a new subject leader for mathematics. You have identified that further adaptations are needed in mathematics to ensure that pupils are able to solve problems and reason more effectively.

p.2

Main findings

All subject leaders now have the time to develop and monitor their subjects. The trust’s educational development advisers have supported subject leaders to evaluate the quality of the curriculum. The curriculum is not yet consistently well delivered in many foundation subjects. Pupils’ work is not of a consistent high quality and their understanding of the foundation subjects lacks depth.

p.2

Main findings

There is now a strong approach to helping pupils learn to read. You have invested in a new systematic synthetic phonics scheme. Staff who deliver this scheme are well trained. They are early reading experts. They use a well-understood and effective approach to help pupils learn to read. Adults support pupils at the early stages of reading to become better readers. All pupils study a range of texts and this helps to develop their love for reading.

p.2

Main findings

The appointment of the SENCo has helped teachers to be more ambitious for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The needs of these pupils are identified more precisely. Teachers make more effective use of the strategies to help pupils with SEND access the curriculum. Pupils with SEND are fully included in all aspects of the school. This was not always the case at the time of the last inspection.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have taken effective action to improve the culture of behaviour at the school. Behaviour is now much more positive. Staff and pupils agree that the behaviour policy is now applied more consistently by staff and that the expectations of pupils’ behaviour are higher. The strengthened pastoral team is proactive in helping those pupils who may need extra support to show better self-regulation. The school has introduced pastoral support plans to support these pupils to manage their own behaviour. Different types of behaviour incidents are now logged through the school’s electronic system. This has allowed leaders to analyse trends and address behaviour issues more effectively. At the start of the academic year there were several high-level behaviour incidents, but these have now become few and far between as pupils and staff have adjusted to the higher expectations. You have appointed an education welfare officer. You recognise that there are still some

p.2

Main findings

pupils who are persistently absent. The education welfare officer is working closely with external agencies and families to improve the attendance of these pupils. This also demonstrates that leaders are making improvements beyond what was recommended in the previous inspection.

p.3

Main findings

You have considered how pupils should develop their understanding of British values and of different faiths and cultures. However, this is still in the early stages of being planned. This means that these opportunities are not embedded or given explicitly enough. Pupils still only have a surface-level understanding of British values and of different faiths and cultures.

p.3

Main findings

Staff and pupils describe the school as ‘much improved’. The large-scale changes have been managed effectively by leaders to avoid overloading staff. This is leading to sustainable improvement. Staff report high levels of engagement with the new leaders. Staff’s workload and well-being have been duly considered as you make improvements to the school.

p.3

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Lincoln Anglican Academy Trust, the director of education for the Diocese of Lincoln, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Lincolnshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion