Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

West Midlands Consortium

Inspected 16 Jun 2023 · published 18 Jul 2023 · URN 70083

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christopher Stevens (lead), Richard Gill, Tracy Wallis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Jun 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Christopher Stevens, Richard Gill, Tracy Wallis

  • Postcode verified

    TF3 4NW

  • Name on report verified

    West Midlands Consortium

  • URN verified

    70083

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseambitiousexceptionalexceptionallyhigh expectationseffectivevery wellskilfullystrengths
Criticismnot alwaysgapsnot well prepared

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
876
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%About the inspection 41%

Full report text

West Midlands Consortium Thomas Telford School, Old Park, Telford, Shropshire TF3 4NW

p.1

Inspection judgements

Primary and secondary age-phase combined

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education and training Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees are proud to be associated with West Midlands Consortium (WMC) and are overwhelmingly positive about all aspects of their training. One trainee summed up the views of many when they said, ‘This course is demanding, but staff do all they can to help you succeed. I would not hesitate to recommend WMC.’

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

WMC’s ambitious and well-crafted training programmes reflect leaders’ high expectations of trainees. Leaders instil in trainees the importance of high professional standards and, above all else, ‘putting pupils first’. These qualities are highly regarded by partner schools.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Leaders and staff know trainees exceptionally well. Trainees receive exceptional pastoral care from their course leaders and mentors. Trainees greatly appreciate this. They feel valued, listened to and part of the ‘WMC family’.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees receive high-quality training that prepares them well for the realities of teaching. From the outset of the programme, they are taught how to manage pupils’ behaviour positively. Trainees also receive effective training on supporting pupils whatever their needs, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Primary-phase trainees are well prepared to teach pupils at the earliest stages of reading. In the secondary phase, trainees are very well supported to develop their subject knowledge. This is also the case for most subjects in the primary phase.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Partnership working is a strength. Leaders ensure that partner schools are fully involved in all aspects of the partnership’s work, including designing and continuously improving the initial teacher education (ITE) curriculum.

p.1

Information about this ITE provider

◼ WMC is a well-established, school-based initial teacher training (SCITT) provider. It has been providing teacher training since 1995. The SCITT is based at Thomas Telford School. ◼ There are 45 trainees in this academic year. There are 22 trainees in the primary phase and 23 trainees in the secondary phase. ◼ Most trainees opt to study for a postgraduate certificate in education (PGCE). This is accredited by the University of Staffordshire. The provider also offers School Direct fee- paying and salaried routes and the assessment-only route towards qualified teacher status. ◼ There are 61 schools in the partnership located across seven local authority areas. ◼ The schools in the partnership have been judged as outstanding, good or requires improvement by Ofsted.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ The inspection team consisted of one of His Majesty’s Inspectors and two Ofsted Inspectors. ◼ Inspectors spoke to the SCITT leaders, including the director of teacher training and the lead for secondary PGCE physical education (PE). The lead inspector also met with representatives of the provider’s management committee. ◼ Inspectors reviewed a broad range of information relating to the ITE curriculum. This included training materials, documents relating to the assessment of trainees, course handbooks and curriculum plans. ◼ Inspectors completed focused reviews in early reading, mathematics, history, PE and science. ◼ Inspectors reviewed a wide range of documentation concerning the leadership and management of the SCITT. This included information about governance, safeguarding arrangements and the recruitment of trainees. ◼ Inspectors spoke with 30 trainees and 13 early career teachers. Inspectors also held

p.2

Information about this inspection

discussions with a sample of headteachers and mentors. ◼ Inspectors visited 10 placement schools in total.

p.2

better?

Working with partner schools, leaders have constructed an ambitious, coherent curriculum that develops logically. This curriculum is underpinned by credible and up-to-date research. In addition, leaders have ensured that they fully comply with the Department for Education (DfE) core content framework.

p.2

better?

Centre-based training is of a high quality. Leaders skilfully deploy expertise from across the partnership to plan and deliver this training. As part of this training, leaders ensure that trainees, including those in the secondary phase, develop their knowledge of systematic synthetic phonics. Leaders give this training a high priority. Trainees are well equipped and confident to teach reading by the time they complete the course.

p.2

better?

Leaders design the ITE curriculum to allow trainees to revisit their centre-based learning during placements. To support this, they give mentors helpful information and training about the specific content trainees learn in their education and professional issues sessions. This is working well. Overall, the mentoring skilfully reinforces learning and supports trainees to build on the content trainees have learned at the SCITT centre.

p.3

better?

As part of the primary-phase programme, leaders give trainees pertinent information about the key education traditions and practices used in the foundation subjects. In addition, to help trainees put this knowledge into practice, leaders plan for trainees to complete school-based activities known as ‘gap tasks’. Expert colleagues have purposefully designed these tasks so that trainees gain the necessary experience in planning and teaching the foundation subjects. However, leaders do not always check and ensure that partner schools consistently allow trainees to complete these activities. Some trainees do not have the opportunity to plan and teach all of the foundation subjects during their placements. This means that they are less well prepared to teach a small number of subjects.

p.3

better?

In the secondary-phase programme, the curriculum prepares all trainees thoroughly in how to teach their subject. They ensure that trainees understand recent research relating to specific subjects and can put this into practice. For example, PE trainees get plenty of meaningful opportunities to develop their expertise in teaching a wide range of sports.

p.3

better?

The systems for checking trainees’ progress are effective. Leaders have identified the knowledge that trainees need to know and remember at each stage of the course. This helps trainees to understand their strengths and those areas where more work is needed. It also supports mentors and trainees to agree clear and helpful targets.

p.3

better?

Leaders know the partnership’s strengths and areas for development well. They routinely evaluate a wide range of evidence, including the views of partners and trainees. Leaders check most aspects of the programme effectively. This includes checking on the quality of mentoring in schools.

p.3

(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)

◼ In the primary phase, some trainees do not get sufficient opportunities to build their knowledge of how to plan and teach the foundation subjects. This means that some trainees are not fully prepared to teach some subjects. Leaders should ensure that all trainees have adequate opportunities to practise teaching and planning all subjects in the national curriculum. ◼ Leaders do not systematically check whether trainees are completing all their school- based activities. This limits leaders’ ability to identify swiftly gaps in trainees’ experiences. Leaders should ensure that they systematically check whether aspects of the curriculum delivered by partner schools are taking place as they intend.

p.3

the ITE compliance criteria?

◼ The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.

p.4

ITE provider details

Unique reference number 70083 Inspection number 10247699

p.5

ITE provider details

This inspection was carried out in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook’.

p.5

ITE provider details

This framework and handbook set out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.

p.5

ITE provider details

Type of ITE provider School-centred initial teacher training Phases provided Primary and secondary combined Date of previous inspection 20 January and 23 January 2014

p.5

Inspection team

Christopher Stevens, Lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Richard Gill Ofsted Inspector Tracy Wallis Ofsted Inspector

p.5

Annex: Placement schools

Inspectors visited the following schools as part of this inspection:

p.6

Name URN ITE phases

Barrow 1618 Church of England Free School 138268 Primary Gnosall St Lawrence Church of England Primary Academy 141779 Primary

p.6

Name URN ITE phases

Hadley Learning Community – Primary Phase 144942 Primary Madeley Academy 135149 Secondary Moreton School 144278 Secondary Redhill Primary Academy 146026 Primary St George’s Church of England Primary School 123527 Primary St Mary and St Chad Church of England First School 147279 Primary The Wordsley School 103858 Secondary Thomas Telford School 123627 Secondary guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Name URN ITE phases

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.7

Name URN ITE phases

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Name URN ITE phases

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Name URN ITE phases

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion