Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Stanway School

Inspected 7 Jun 2023 · published 14 Jul 2023 · URN 137927

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jonathan Rockey (lead), James Shapland, Susan Sutton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Jun 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    James Shapland, Jonathan Rockey, Susan Sutton

  • Postcode verified

    CO3 0QA

  • Name on report verified

    The Stanway School

  • URN verified

    137927

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 24% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyconfidentwell sequencedhigh expectationseffectiveambitiouswell plannedstrong
Criticismconcernsseriouslyseriousdisruptiongapsstrugglenot yetsuspensions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings865w+31
  • Safeguarding141w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,002
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
1
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Safeguarding 9%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: The Stanway School Winstree Road, Stanway, Colchester, Essex CO3 0QA

p.1

Outcome

The Stanway School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils at Stanway are polite, considerate and respectful. Leaders model high expectations, and most pupils respond to this.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils behave appropriately in lessons and learn well as a result. The school is a calm and orderly place during social times.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils trust the school’s pastoral team to act on any concerns they have about bullying. Most pupils state that they have not been affected by bullying. Pupils rarely use prejudicial language. When this occurs, staff do not tolerate it. A typical pupil view is that they are ‘100% confident it would be dealt with.’ School leaders work hard to inform pupils about harmful sexual behaviours. This has been effective in ensuring that pupils are confident to report concerns of inappropriate behaviour. Pupils comment that they feel safe.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils respect those from different backgrounds. Pupils are actively encouraged at the school to treat everyone equally.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are offered a broad range of opportunities outside of the classroom. These include extra-curricular clubs such as science, technology, engineering and maths club. Pupils are encouraged to build character through their involvement in leadership roles, such as school councillors and mental health ambassadors.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders ensure that the curriculum is well sequenced. It is ambitious for all pupils. Teachers have good subject knowledge. They present and model information precisely. Assessment is generally used effectively and enables pupils to identify gaps in their understanding. As a result, pupils know more and remember more. 6 and 7 June 2023

p.1

2

Provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is appropriate. Adaptations in lessons are in line with pupils’ agreed plans. Additional arrangements for transition and options choices are in place to help pupils manage change.

p.2

2

Reading is a priority for leaders. Early identification of the weakest readers ensures that additional support is in place to enable these pupils to develop their reading fluency.

p.2

2

There is a wide variety of activities and clubs available to pupils. The programme of personal, social and health education (PSHE) is well planned and comprehensive. This curriculum programme includes a range of appropriate content. The student voice is taken seriously at Stanway. The views of pupils are considered carefully and directly influence the programme content for PSHE. The careers curriculum is well sequenced, and leadership of this area is strong. There are planned opportunities for pupils to experience apprenticeships, further education, and work experience placements.

p.2

2

Pupils typically enjoy attending the school and would recommend it. Most pupils behave well. Disruption during lessons is infrequent, and pupils can learn well. However, a small minority of pupils do not meet the school’s expectations consistently. As a result, the number of suspensions is high. This impacts on the school’s most vulnerable pupils.

p.2

2

Leaders are committed to improving opportunities for pupils. Governors and trustees have a clear understanding of the changing needs of the community. They recognise that a small minority of pupils are not meeting leaders’ expectations. The overwhelming majority of staff are proud to work at The Stanway School. Staff state that leaders engage with them effectively over issues of workload. Staff well-being is considered by leaders at all levels. This is exemplified through ‘wellbeing weeks’, during which no meetings or after- school events are held.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that accurate records of pre-employment checks are maintained. Safer recruitment policies are followed effectively. There are regular internal and external reviews of safeguarding practice. All staff receive training to spot the signs that a child may need help. Staff are vigilant. Leaders act quickly when pupils require support. Where external agency support is needed, this is accessed quickly and effectively. All staff understand and use the system for reporting safeguarding concerns. Pupils know who to report worries to, and they are confident that action will be taken.

p.2

Safeguarding

The combined efforts of leaders and staff ensure that the impact of harmful sexual behaviours is known and understood by the school community. While incidents of such behaviours are rare, they are treated seriously. Pupils understand how to keep themselves safe. 6 and 7 June 2023

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 A small number of pupils struggle to follow leaders’ expectations for behaviour. As a result, rates of suspension are high. This particularly affects vulnerable pupils. Leaders have recognised that this as an issue, but the impact of their actions has not yet been realised. Leaders must implement a robust strategic plan to address the levels of suspension for this group of pupils.

p.3

Background

When we have judged good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually, this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in May 2013.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 6 and 7 June 2023

p.3

School details

Inspection number 10212485 Type of school Secondary

p.4

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,399

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 17 March 2017

p.4

Information about this school

 The school joined The Sigma Trust in September 2016.  The school currently has an acting head of school and acting executive headteacher as changes to the senior leadership team are implemented.  The school makes use of both registered and unregistered alternative provision.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 7 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The lead inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and has taken this into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the acting headteacher, acting executive headteacher, senior leaders, staff, trust leaders and representatives from the local governing committee. 6 and 7 June 2023

p.4

5

 Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: art, English, history, modern foreign languages, and music. For each deep dive, the inspector met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum planning, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspection team spoke with staff and pupils. The lead inspector met with the designated safeguarding lead and reviewed safeguarding records. The lead inspector also reviewed the single central record of pre- employment checks made on staff and reviewed information about the safer recruitment of staff.  The inspection team met with pupils from different year groups to talk about their learning and experiences at school. Inspectors also reviewed 94 responses to Ofsted’s pupil questionnaire.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documents provided by the school. These included the

p.5

5

school development plan, curriculum documentation and school policies.  Inspectors considered 225 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for parents, Ofsted Parent View. This included 148 responses from parents and carers to the free- text facility. Inspectors also considered the 64 responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.5

Inspection team

Jonathan Rockey, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

James Shapland Ofsted Inspector 6 and 7 June 2023

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion