Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Jul 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mary Cook

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mary Cook

  • Postcode verified

    DL1 5AJ

  • Name on report verified

    Skerne Park Academy This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−22Mixedmore positive than 14% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyclearfeel safepositivesupportiveconsistentimproving
Criticisminconsistenciesgapsrequires improvementnot sufficientlynot alwayslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings658w−23
  • What needs to improve248w−11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
903
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%What needs to improve 27%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Clair Gooding Headteacher Skerne Park Academy Coleridge Gardens Darlington County Durham DL1 5AJ

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Skerne Park Academy

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 25 May 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Skerne Park Academy

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, the CEO of the multi-academy trust, other staff, a trustee and members of the local governing body the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited mathematics lessons, spoke with groups of pupils, looked at pupils’ work and reviewed school documents. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the school to

The school should take further action to:

p.1

progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the school to

 Evaluate the content of the new curriculum and the teaching choices made in the delivery of the curriculum. Use this information to fine-tune the curriculum further so that it reflects the stated curriculum intent.  Ensure that teachers more consistently check the knowledge pupils have learned and what they need to learn next across all subjects taught.  Review the approach to the teaching of pupils with complex special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) to check that this maximises learning and is in line with leaders’ stated ambition to be inclusive.

p.1

Main findings

Since the last inspection, there has been a significant change in the leadership of the school. You took up the substantive post of headteacher in September 2022, after working in the school for a day a week during the summer term. Subject leadership has been devolved to individual teachers. They have been supported and trained in these roles by an experienced school improvement partner.

p.2

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, you have started making improvements to curriculum plans. New curriculum plans were put in place in September 2022 for the foundation subjects. The planning identifies the key concepts that you want pupils to learn over time. It is sequenced in a way that builds up knowledge. However, you, and the staff team, have identified that the new curriculum is not sufficiently bespoke to deliver your curriculum intent. Nor do the current plans consider the gaps that pupils may have in their prior learning, resulting from the previous curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

You have ensured that there is a more consistent approach to assessment. There are clear systems in place for tracking pupils against curriculum end points. Termly assessments are used to identify gaps in learning. Pupils receive specific interventions to make sure that they catch up. Subject leaders have a much better understanding of what pupils have learned. The feedback books used in mathematics show that teachers are encouraged to think about what has worked well in each lesson. They review the work of pupils and plan how to support pupils with any misconceptions they may have. You acknowledge that there are still some inconsistencies in this practice. Teachers do not always correctly identify those pupils who need additional support. Some teachers do not modify the way in which they deliver the curriculum when pupils are struggling to learn the concept being taught.

p.2

Main findings

Since the introduction of the new behaviour policy, there has been a significant improvement in the behaviour shown by pupils in school. Staff and pupils are clear about expectations of behaviour. They understand the systems in place to manage behaviour. Pupils spoken to report a much calmer learning environment. They feel safe in school. In class, I saw very positive attitudes towards learning. On the playground, pupils were playing together and having fun. However, there are still some inconsistencies in the way the behaviour policy is implemented by some members of staff. Pupils report that a small number of lessons are disrupted because of this.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils with the most complex SEND needs are educated in the ‘Pathways’ provision. Some pupils return to do some learning activities with their base class. Others remain in the Pathways class for most of their learning. There are a significant number of pupils, with limited staffing. Given the complexity of needs, staff are not able to fully maximise pupils’ learning.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders from the trust have been supportive in working alongside you and the governing body. They have brokered the school improvement partner who has made a significant contribution in terms of training and support. The trust has made changes to the building entrances which improve safeguarding. This has also helped in identifying those pupils who are late to school so that guidance for parents can be put in place. Governors understand their responsibilities and show commitment to improving the school. Guidance from the school improvement partner has strengthened the support and challenge given to you and your leaders by governors. The governors particularly value their visits to the school to meet with subject leaders. These strengthen their knowledge and develop their ability to support your improvements.

p.2

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the chief executive officer of the Hummersknot Academy Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Darlington. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion