Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Albany

Inspected 11 May 2023 · published 5 Jul 2023 · URN 146422

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Wendy Varney (lead), Suzanne Thrower

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 May 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Suzanne Thrower, Wendy Varney

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    IP32 6SA

  • Name on report verified

    The Albany

  • URN verified

    146422

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 76% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelystrongpositiveimprovedeffectivehigh expectationsextremelystrong relationships
Criticismpoorconcernspoorlyunsafedisruptioninadequategapstoo low

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1359w−9
  • Safeguarding111w+11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,446
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 53
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 6
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of The Albany Beard Road, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 6SA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 10 and 11 May 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils come to The Albany having had difficult experiences at other schools. The school does not provide pupils with the positive new start that they need. The poor behaviour that has blighted their education before continues after they have joined the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Expectations of what pupils can achieve are too low. They are provided with a very narrow education that does not prepare them well for the next stage of their lives. Pupils receive little guidance about future jobs or life after school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ behaviour over time has been extremely poor. For example, until this academic year, pupils frequently climbed on the roof and left the school site without permission. Pupils’ behaviour inside the school was often unsafe and out of control. Leaders have taken actions recently that have reduced the frequency and intensity of these behaviours. The school is now calmer, but pupils’ learning remains disrupted by others’ behaviour.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has improved over the last few months. Pupils feel safer now than they did previously. Their lessons are disturbed less often than they were before. Pupils are not worried about bullying. Relationships between pupils and staff are typically strong. This helps pupils to feel safe at school.

p.2

better?

The Albany does not provide pupils with an acceptable quality of education. Trustees have not held leaders to account well enough. The school’s curriculum is very narrow. It includes only English, mathematics, science, and personal, social and health education (PSHE). Pupils do not receive the broad and balanced education that they are entitled to.

p.2

better?

The curriculum is at a very early stage of development. As a result, there is little evidence of pupils’ learning being built on over time. Learning is haphazard and poorly planned. Many pupils are registered both at this school and at their ‘base’ mainstream school. Leaders have not ensured that there is close liaison with pupils’ base schools. The curriculum at The Albany does not help pupils to keep pace with their peers in their base school.

p.2

better?

The curriculum lacks ambition. All pupils, regardless of their age or previous learning, have the same lessons and do the same work. Staff do not have the knowledge they need to be able to teach the curriculum successfully.

p.2

better?

Many pupils are either educated entirely off site or attend school part time. Some pupils do not have a full timetable of educational activities, with some having as little as 14 hours of timetabled activity per week. The school does not offer any GCSEs, despite some pupils being capable of achieving them. All pupils, including those in Year 8, are entered for functional skills examinations in English and 10 and 11 May 2023

p.2

3

mathematics. It is not clear that this is always in pupils’ best interests. Pupils do not achieve well and they are ill-prepared for the next stage of their education.

p.3

3

Teachers’ use of assessment is underdeveloped. They are unable to check how well pupils are learning the curriculum because leaders have not identified what pupils are expected to learn. Pupils’ individual learning needs are not identified or met well enough. Too little is done to ensure that gaps in pupils’ learning are filled effectively.

p.3

3

Leaders do not put sufficient emphasis on reading. There is no structured programme to help the weakest readers to become proficient. The reading curriculum is underdeveloped. Too many pupils do not value reading or see why it is important.

p.3

3

Leaders do not keep or use records of behaviour incidents effectively. For example, records do not show the actions leaders have taken in response to incidents. This means that leaders are unable to identify patterns of behaviour. They do not know whether the actions taken in response to incidents are effective. Although there has been some recent improvement, persistent low-level behaviours continue to disrupt pupils’ learning.

p.3

3

The school’s PSHE curriculum is at a fledgling stage but includes some positive aspects. For example, pupils are starting to learn about issues such as equality and diversity. Careers education is at a similarly early stage. Pupils in Year 11 receive some careers guidance but there is currently no provision for pupils in other year groups.

p.3

3

There are strong relationships between staff and pupils. These are starting to have a positive impact on pupils’ behaviour in classrooms, but it is very early days. Staff provide pupils with opportunities to take part in activities such as cooking and visits to a local gym. Pupils go on trips to places of interest both locally and further afield.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Recently, leaders have strengthened and improved safeguarding. Staff have received a great deal of training. They identify concerns about pupils well and report their concerns promptly using the school’s system. The designated safeguarding leads understand their roles well and take appropriate action when concerns are reported to them.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have put strong arrangements in place to check that pupils are safe while attending alternative providers or when they are being educated in their own homes. Staff take appropriate actions, including visiting pupils’ homes, to assure themselves about pupils’ welfare.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders carry out the required pre-appointment checks and record these accurately. 10 and 11 May 2023

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school provides a poor quality of education. As a results, pupils do not achieve well and are ill-prepared for their next stage of learning. Leaders should take action to ensure that: - the school has a coherent and well-sequenced curriculum, of appropriate breadth and depth, that gives reading a sufficiently high focus - staff have sufficiently strong subject knowledge to deliver the curriculum effectively - assessment accurately identifies pupils’ individual learning needs and gaps in their knowledge, and these are addressed effectively.  There is frequent low-level disruption and pupils often refuse to follow instructions given to them by members of staff. Expectations of how pupils should behave are not high enough and staff do not routinely manage behaviour effectively. This results in poor behaviour around the school and disruption to learning. A large proportion of pupils are either educated remotely or are on part-

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

time timetables. This means that they do not receive the full-time education that they are entitled to. Records of behaviour incidents do not contain all the information they should. As a result, leaders are not able to check for patterns of behaviour or monitor the effectiveness of actions taken. Leaders should take action to: - ensure that all staff have consistently high expectations of how pupils should behave, and have the necessary skills to manage behaviour effectively - significantly reduce the number of pupils on part-time timetables - improve the way behaviour incidents are recorded, including where physical intervention has been necessary, so that patterns can be identified and the effectiveness of actions taken can be assessed  The school’s wider curriculum is underdeveloped. Pupils are not provided with a rich and varied range of experiences. Careers and guidance are underdeveloped, particularly for pupils in key stage 3 and Year 10. As a result, pupils are poorly

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

prepared for their next steps in education, training or employment. Leaders should take action to ensure that all pupils: - are provided with broad set of experiences that are well matched to their needs and interests - receive appropriate careers information and guidance that fully meets the Gatsby Benchmarks.  Trustees have not held leaders well enough to account over time. As a result, the quality of provision has deteriorated so that the school’s overall effectiveness is now inadequate. Leaders and trustees should take action to ensure that: - as a minimum, the school provides an acceptable standard of education 10 and 11 May 2023

p.4

5

- leadership of subjects is developed so that high-quality schemes of work are developed across the curriculum - governance arrangements are improved and strengthened so that trustees support and challenge the school effectively.

p.5

5

Having considered the evidence, we strongly recommend that leaders and those responsible for governance do not seek to appoint early career teachers.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 10 and 11 May 2023

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10268331 Type of school Pupil referral unit

p.6

School details

School category Academy alternative provision converter

p.6

School details

Headteacher Darryl James (interim headteacher)

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.6

Information about this school

 The Albany is a school for pupils in key stage 3 and key stage 4 who have been permanently excluded from school or who are at risk of permanent exclusion.  All pupils have special educational needs and/or disabilities related to their social, emotional and mental health needs. More than half of pupils have an education, health and care plan.  The school has been sponsored by the Believe Engage Succeed Trust since 1 February 2019.  The school uses four registered and four unregistered alternative providers.  The Albany converted to become an academy school in February 2019. When its predecessor school, Albany PRU, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be good overall.  At the time the inspection took place, the school was expecting to be re-brokered to the Raedwald Trust on 1 June 2023.  The interim headteacher joined the school in July 2022 as head of school, under the direction of the then executive headteacher. He took on the interim headship

p.6

Information about this school

role at the end of September 2022 when the executive headteacher left the school. 10 and 11 May 2023

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.7

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the interim headteacher, subject leaders, staff and pupils. Inspectors met with the chief executive officer of the Believe Engage Succeed Trust and, separately, with the chief executive of the Raedwald Trust, using video conferencing. The lead inspector met with the chair of the local governing body.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science and PSHE. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors listened to pupils reading, scrutinised a range of school documents and

p.7

Information about this inspection

observed lunch and break times.  In order to check the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors checked the single central record of pre-appointment checks, looked at records of child protection concerns and spoke with staff and pupils.  There were too few responses to Ofsted Parent View for results to be available. Inspectors took account of the six free-text comments that were received. They also took account of 13 responses to the staff survey and six responses to the pupil survey.

p.7

Inspection team

Wendy Varney, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Suzanne Thrower Ofsted Inspector 10 and 11 May 2023

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion