Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Jul 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stuart Perkins

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stuart Perkins

  • Postcode verified

    M13 9UJ

  • Name on report verified

    Medlock Primary School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseaccuratelysecureimprovedskilfullyconfidentlyeffectivelyrichpositively
Criticismgapsweaknessesrequires improvement

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings776w+47
  • What needs to improve227w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,001
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
7
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%What needs to improve 23%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Jonathan Brown Headteacher Medlock Primary School Wadeson Road Chorlton-on-Medlock Manchester Greater Manchester M13 9UJ

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Medlock Primary School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 4 May 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Medlock Primary School

During the inspection, I discussed with you, other senior leaders, the local authority and those responsible for governance, the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID- 19 pandemic. I visited lessons, heard pupils read to a familiar adult, discussed curriculum improvements with subject leaders and met with a selection of pupils from different year groups. I also considered a range of school documentation including minutes of governing body meetings and leaders’ documentation relating to safegaurding. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the school to

The school should take further action to:

p.1

progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the school to

 further embed the phonics and early reading programme and ensure that staff are secure in their subject knowledge to deliver the programme with confidence  embed leaders’ assessment systems in a small number of subjects to enable staff to accurately identify the gaps that pupils may have in earlier learning.

p.1

Main findings

You were appointed as headteacher shortly before the last graded inspection. Since your appointment, you have appointed a number of new teaching staff.

p.2

Main findings

You and other leaders have designed a suitable plan of action to address the areas for improvement identified by inspectors at the previous graded inspection. Your improvement plan focuses accurately on the correct priorities required. Added to this, you have set clear milestones to help you to evaluate the progress that you and other leaders are making. There is secure evidence that you have already improved the quality of education that pupils receive, particularly in phonics and early reading.

p.2

Main findings

You have implemented a new phonics programme to address the weaknesses identified in the delivery of the early reading curriculum. Teachers are now clearer about your higher expectations for pupils’ achievement in reading. You have ensured that staff have received training to help them to deliver this programme well. Staff use assessment strategies skilfully to identify those pupils who need additional help to keep up in reading. These pupils receive appropriate support from well-trained staff to ensure that they can catch up quickly and keep pace with the scheme.

p.2

Main findings

In the main, teachers deliver the phonics scheme with confidence. For instance, teachers are increasingly focused on using the assessment information to match accurately the books that pupils read to their phonics ability. This is helping pupils to decode more difficult words and read with increased fluency. However, some staff need further support to build their confidence in delivering some aspects of the programme. For example, from time to time, some staff select books that do not match closely enough the sounds that pupils have learned. This hampers these pupils’ ability to read confidently and fluently as quickly as they should.

p.2

Main findings

Following the previous inspection, you have supported subject leaders to refine the guidance that they provide to teachers about what pupils should be learning. As a result, staff are clearer on what they should be teaching and when this content should be delivered. For instance, leaders have considered what vocabulary will support pupils in their learning in different topics. This is helping staff to know those aspects of the curriculum to emphasise and revisit.

p.2

Main findings

You have acted to ensure that leaders support teachers to use your assessment systems effectively. This is helping staff to identify those aspects of learning that pupils may have forgotten. For example, staff provide pupils with ample opportunities to revisit or recall important prior learning. This helps pupils to better remember earlier knowledge and make links with new learning. That said, in a small number of subjects, teachers are not as well equipped to identify the gaps in pupils’ learning. In these subjects, this prevents some pupils from building securely on what they know already and developing a rich body of subject knowledge.

p.2

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

Governors have responded positively to the final area for improvement identified by inspectors at the previous inspection. Since then, the local authority commissioned an external review of governance. This has helped them to become more knowledgeable about leaders’ priorities and more focused on their responsibilities.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

Following on from the external review, when recruiting new governors, members of the governing body ensure that they identify the skills and expertise required to strengthen governance arrangements. As a result, collectively, governors now have the appropriate knowledge to hold leaders to account for the quality of education for pupils. Added to this, governors have also ensured that they receive clearer information from leaders about how well pupils are learning the curriculum.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

Finally, members of the governing body have acted to ensure that they are kept up to date about the progress that leaders are making to develop and further refine the curriculum. This means that governors can ask increasingly probing questions about pupils’ achievement across a broad range of subjects.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

You said that you are making effective use of the external support that you have received since the previous inspection. For example, you have brokered support from a local teaching school that you believe has helped you to improve the design and delivery of the phonics and early reading curriculum. Added to this, the support that you have received from the local authority has meant that you are more informed about how to refine and adapt your improvement planning going forward.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Manchester. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion