Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Childminder in Derbyshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 May 2023
- Inspectors verified
Rebecca Sigley
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY447205
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder has significant areas of weakness in her knowledge of safeguarding, in particular, recognising the signs of extremism, female genital mutilation and dealing with safeguarding concerns. p.2
- The childminder shows inconsistency when tackling this, giving some children more attention than others, which means that some children become unclear about behaviour expectations. p.3
- She understands who to report her concerns to, however, shows a lack of knowledge about how to identify risks to keep children safe. p.3
- to poor hygiene in the kitchen food preparation areas. p.2
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Health & safety4
“to poor hygiene in the kitchen food preparation areas.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 747
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The childminder has significant areas of weakness in her knowledge of safeguarding, in particular, recognising the signs of extremism, female genital mutilation and dealing with safeguarding concerns. Additionally, the childminder does not make sure that she knows a family's background before children start attending, in particular, children who speak English as an additional language (EAL).
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The childminder does not show a high level of understanding of children's interests and next steps. This results in children's learning not being extended and developed. The childminder does not understand what a curriculum is. This has a negative impact on children, due to their learning not being sequenced and play and learning opportunities being very limited. For example, children cannot choose any other play equipment; they can only use the small number of toys selected for them by the childminder.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children do have some positive experiences with the childminder. They enter the childminder's home calmly and become settled in their play. Children smile and laugh in the childminder's care. The childminder provides experiences for the children to play together, such as building a tower and knocking it down. The childminder gives positive reinforcement when children succeed in their achievements, saying, 'well done' and 'that's great'.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder's knowledge of safeguarding is extremely weak. The childminder is unable to respond appropriately when she is presented with scenarios covering a range of possible safeguarding situations. n The childminder presented two activities all morning for the children to play with, which were jigsaws and blocks. The childminder gave praise throughout each activity, encouraging the children to have a go, however, this was not consistent. The children showed interest initially in the blocks, however, the activity of building a tower and knocking it over soon became too repetitive for the children who became bored. The childminder did not enhance the activity further. n The childminder's kitchen contained clutter on the work surfaces which are used to prepare food. Risk assessments are not used to help to maintain a safe space to cook. The cooker hob is dirty. There is a potential risk to children's health due
p.2
need to do better?
to poor hygiene in the kitchen food preparation areas. n The childminder is unaware of how to enhance children's learning experiences within the wider environment. Her lack of knowledge and understanding of a curriculum affects the opportunities children have to explore and develop new
p.2
need to do better?
19 May 2023 ideas. n The childminder does not present age-appropriate activities and sets children's next steps too high. Children take part in activities, such as counting from one to 19. However, such an activity is too advanced for the group of children present. The childminder did not notice that children were not engaging and continued to count higher than the children's understanding. n The childminder does have a close relationship with parents, sharing information on the children's daily events through an online communication system. However, the childminder does not ensure that the needs of children who speak EAL are met from the moment they start. n Parents are happy with the level of care their children receive and have brought their other children over the years. However, they are unaware of the next steps the childminder has identified for their child or what she is providing for the child
p.2
need to do better?
to help them to work towards their next steps. n Some children do struggle to manage their emotions throughout activities and become impatient when waiting their turn. The childminder shows inconsistency when tackling this, giving some children more attention than others, which means that some children become unclear about behaviour expectations. Nevertheless, overall, children do generally behave well.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The childminder's safeguarding practice and knowledge is weak. She is unclear on her responsibility to safeguard and protect children, in particular, around the 'Prevent' duty and extremism. She understands who to report her concerns to, however, shows a lack of knowledge about how to identify risks to keep children safe. The childminder ensures that her safeguarding training is all up to date, however, she does not retain this information effectively. The premises are secure and the childminder is vigilant about this.
p.3
Due date
ensure that all areas of safeguarding knowledge are secure and children are fully protected from harm 02/06/2023
p.3
Due date
ensure that children's learning and development are accurately assessed and that appropriate next steps in learning are set 02/06/2023
p.3
Due date
19 May 2023 ensure that an effective curriculum is in place for children who speak EAL 02/06/2023
p.3
Due date
ensure that risk assessments within the kitchen are fully effective to create a hygienic preparation space. 02/06/2023
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY447205 Local authority Derbyshire Inspection number 10280251 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 3 Number of children on roll 6 Date of previous inspection 20 September 2017
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2012 and lives in Glossop, Derbyshire. She holds an early years qualification at level 3. She operates all year round, from 7am to 6.30pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the childminder received since the COVID- 19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the childminder and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the childminder. n The childminder showed the inspector the premises and discussed how they ensure that they are safe and suitable. n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises their early years provision, including the aims and rationale for the early years foundation stage curriculum. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoor and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n Documents were presented, such as first-aid qualifications and Disclosure and Barring Service information. n The inspector spoke to parents and took account of their views.
p.5
Inspection activities
19 May 2023 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
19 May 2023 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion