Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Redborne Upper School and Community College
Summary
Andrew Hemmings (lead), Fiona Webb, Paul Lawrence
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 May 2023
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Hemmings, Fiona Webb, Paul Lawrence
- Postcode verified
MK45 2NU
- Name on report verified
Redborne Upper School and Community College
- URN verified
136559
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not always get the help they need to succeed. p.1
- They check that pupils have learned what they need to and address pupils’ knowledge gaps and misunderstandings. p.2
- The attendance of pupils with SEND and of disadvantaged pupils is lower than it should be. p.3
- Pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they should. p.2
- Leaders should put in place systems that ensure pupils learn well across the curriculum, including through the use of an approach to identify and support pupils who struggle to read accurately or fluently. p.3
- Leaders need to ensure that staff know and use the information they have to support all pupils to succeed. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance22
“Leaders are vigilant in following up concerns about pupils’ welfare.” p.3Teaching & assessment6
“Teachers enjoy working at the school.” p.2Progress & outcomes3
“Pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they should.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,364
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 60, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 19%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Redborne Upper School and Community College Flitwick Road, Ampthill, Bedford, Bedfordshire MK45 2NU
p.1
Outcome
There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. Inspectors are recommending the next inspection to be a graded inspection.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
While many pupils enjoy their time at school and learn well, some pupils do not. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not always get the help they need to succeed.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils generally behave well. They listen to teachers and to each other. They are polite and courteous, and they demonstrate respect for the individuality of other people. Most pupils can be themselves in safety and with confidence.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Many pupils feel there is someone in school they can talk to about any worries they might have. However, some pupils feel they cannot approach the pastoral ‘hub’ because they feel they will not be listened to, or that the action taken will not help. Bullying is not a significant problem, but some pupils are not confident that it will always be dealt with well if it is reported.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Too many pupils are frequently absent from school. This impacts negatively on how much they learn, particularly for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders aim high in working to develop pupils’ wider experiences. Trips and visits are well on the way to returning to pre-pandemic levels. A wide range of extra-curricular activities enrich pupils’ education.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders and governors recognised that there was some drift from the standards evident at the time of the previous inspection. With the full backing of governors, leaders have worked strategically to make improvements. 4 and 5 May 2023
p.1
2
Leaders’ first target was to improve behaviour, and they have done so. Pupils and staff report improvements, reflecting the positive behaviours inspectors saw first hand. There have, at times, been areas that were made unpleasant by the inappropriate behaviours of some pupils. Leaders’ considered management of the school site and the effective deployment of staff have done much to resolve this.
p.2
2
One aspect of leaders’ approach to supporting pupils’ well-being and behaviour has been the creation of a central pastoral ‘hub’. Sitting at the heart of the school site, this ‘one stop shop’ is where key safeguarding and pastoral staff are available to pupils. While there are notable benefits to this, the hub is visible and staffed all day, it is also very busy. Some pupils feel that staff in the hub do not have time for them and that their concerns are not taken seriously or followed up well. They are reluctant to approach the hub with their worries.
p.2
2
Leaders’ work to develop the curriculum was slowed by the pandemic but has still been largely successful. Pupils typically learn well from knowledgeable staff. Leaders give teachers clarity over what to teach and when. Teachers adhere to this, reinforcing knowledge at different times to make sure it ‘sticks’ in pupils’ memories. They check that pupils have learned what they need to and address pupils’ knowledge gaps and misunderstandings.
p.2
2
There are some parts of pupils’ education that are not as well catered for as most. In some subjects, teachers do not ensure that pupils understand the basics of a subject before asking them to undertake complex tasks. While leaders want to support pupils to read well, they have not put in place a systematic approach to help pupils who struggle to read accurately or fluently. Pupils’ learning in these areas is not as strong as in most.
p.2
2
Pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they should. Leaders’ system to provide teachers with information to support pupils’ needs is new. It contains pertinent and helpful information but has not had time to have sufficient impact. Leaders have worked to improve the attendance of pupils with SEND, as well as of disadvantaged pupils. This has not, at this stage, led to a sufficient increase in the amount of time some of these pupils spend in school. It further limits the achievement of these pupils.
p.2
2
Leaders promote pupils’ wider development well. Trips to the theatre and overseas visits support pupils’ understanding of the wider world. The Duke of Edinburgh’s Award is a prominent feature, giving many pupils the chance to learn about what they are capable of. Leaders have expanded the programme of careers education to further enhance pupils’ understanding of their future choices.
p.2
2
Teachers enjoy working at the school. Leaders are considerate of staff’s workload and try to ensure that staff are only asked to do something if there is a good reason.
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 4 and 5 May 2023
p.2
3
Leaders are vigilant in following up concerns about pupils’ welfare. They are mindful of specific issues that might affect the pupils in their care, such as the mental well-being of pupils since the pandemic. Leaders are alert to the risks this poses and conscientious in seeking support.
p.3
3
Leaders have ensured that appropriate pre-employment checks have been carried out on adults who work in the school. Staff have been trained to keep pupils safe. Leaders encourage pupils to pass on worries to staff. Pupils know that they could pass concerns on. However, because they do not feel this will always be helpful, some are reluctant to do so.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some pupils perceive that the pastoral care team will not respond helpfully to concerns they raise. As a result, some pupils are reluctant to share their worries with staff. Leaders should ensure that all pupils know that they should and can report things that worry them, and that these reports will be dealt with well. The system for sharing important information with staff about pupils with SEND has recently been overhauled. It has not, at this stage, ensured that pupils get all the support they need. Leaders need to ensure that staff know and use the information they have to support all pupils to succeed. The attendance of pupils with SEND and of disadvantaged pupils is lower than it should be. This is having a negative impact on their educational achievement. Leaders need to make sure that all groups of pupils attend school well. Some aspects of pupils’ education, including in learning to read, are weaker than most.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Consequently, pupils learn less well in these areas. Leaders should put in place systems that ensure pupils learn well across the curriculum, including through the use of an approach to identify and support pupils who struggle to read accurately or fluently.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually, this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good on 7 and 8 November 2017. 4 and 5 May 2023
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 4 and 5 May 2023
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10268567 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive School category Academy converter
p.5
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,636
p.5
form
Website http://redbornecommunitycollege.com
p.5
form
Date of previous inspection 7 and 8 November 2017, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 7 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. The school makes use of three unregistered and three registered alternative education providers.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 4 and 5 May 2023
p.5
6
Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, design technology, geography and business studies. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector held meetings with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher and other leaders, including the special educational needs coordinator. The lead inspector also met with trustees, including the chair of the trust. To inspect safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record of recruitment and vetting checks, spoke with leaders of safeguarding, reviewed safeguarding records and spoke with staff and pupils. Inspectors considered the 119 responses to the Ofsted’s staff survey, the 377 responses to the pupil survey, and the 299 responses to the survey, Ofsted Parent
p.6
6
View, including 293 free-text responses.
p.6
Inspection team
Andrew Hemmings, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Fiona Webb Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 May 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion