Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Tring School

Inspected 5 May 2023 · published 27 Jun 2023 · URN 138352

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Phillips (lead), Brenda Watson, Cathy Barr

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 May 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Brenda Watson, Cathy Barr, Mark Phillips

  • Postcode verified

    HP23 5JD

  • Name on report verified

    Tring School

  • URN verified

    138352

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 21% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectivehigh expectationsvery wellextremelyunsafehappyswiftly
Criticismconcernsnot alwaysseriousconcerntoo lowstrugglelower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,320
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Tring School Mortimer Hill, Tring, Hertfordshire HP23 5JD

p.1

Outcome

Tring School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils and students are safe and happy here. Although large in number, everyone works well together to build a strong sense of community. While there are occasional moments of over-exuberance in the corridors and around the expansive school site, things rarely get out of hand. When they do, adults address inappropriate behaviours swiftly. Most pupils have confidence in adults’ resolution of disagreements and of the rare incidences of bullying that occur.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

There are high expectations at the school, including for the standards pupils and students should achieve in their examinations. Most pupils do very well, although there is still some way to go in the numbers taking and passing the full English Baccalaureate (EBacc) suite of GCSEs.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Provision for personal development is strong, including for students in the sixth form. Opportunities abound to participate in musical and dramatic performances, in addition to the sports clubs on offer. Wider afield, the school also provides opportunities for participation in the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme and the World Challenge. Pupils and students are able to show leadership, and this does much to build confidence. Tring is a school where everyone is made to feel welcome and can be themselves, whatever their background or personal situation.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The curriculum offered in the main school and in the sixth form is broad and well organised. Subject planning sets out clearly what is to be taught and learned. These plans are followed precisely. Leaders monitor the quality of provision in individual subjects and take swift action where it is needed.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils and students achieve well in examinations because they have secure subject knowledge. Typically, teaching breaks learning down into manageable and memorable chunks and tasks. Time is then allowed for pupils and students to practise and to master key skills and knowledge. Skilful questioning helps teachers to understand whether 4 and 5 May 2023

p.1

2

important learning has been fully grasped. They provide extra practise for those who need it.

p.2

2

The school is at the forefront of online learning. All pupils have exclusive use of their own laptop. This proved particularly beneficial during the COVID-19 lockdowns, when learning was able to continue immediately and without interruption because of the strong systems already in place. These approaches support access to the curriculum and learning for all pupils and students, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

2

The needs of pupils with SEND are accurately identified. Appropriate specialist support is put in place, when required. If this is not readily available from outside agencies, leaders proactively seek out alternative arrangements. The school makes effective provision for pupils who struggle to read.

p.2

2

Beyond the classroom, pupils and students are offered a range of opportunities to broaden their knowledge and experience. However, in a few subjects, leaders do not extend and deepen pupils’ cultural knowledge as much as they might – for example, beyond the requirements of an examination specification. Leaders have revised the curriculum offer in modern foreign languages in Years 7 to 9. However, the proportion of pupils taking and achieving the range of GCSEs that make up the EBacc remains significantly short of the government’s ambition.

p.2

2

Typically, pupils’ and students’ behaviour in lessons is strong. They demonstrate commendable attitudes to learning. Working relationships with adults are extremely positive. This plays an important part in making teaching and learning effective. While occasional misbehaviour around the school buildings does not make pupils feel unsafe, it makes some feel uncomfortable.

p.2

2

Provision for pupils’ and students’ wider development is strong, including in sex and relationships education, where they gain a very mature and well-informed, age-related understanding of risks and responsibilities. The school’s work on inclusion and diversity is particularly noteworthy. This includes the student diversity group, which has worked effectively to increase awareness and promote understanding among their peers and with staff. The organisation of pastoral support through tutors and house staff means that every pupil and student is known individually.

p.2

2

Trustees and governors are knowledgeable and experienced. They have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for development. Staff are appreciative of leaders’ consideration of their workload. While most parents are supportive of the school, some would like more detailed information around the progress their children are making. Others would welcome better communication about SEND or about issues in staffing and the curriculum that affect their child. While all necessary information is available to parents on the trust and school websites, it is not always easy to locate or access.

p.2

3

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

3

All required staff recruitment checks are made and recorded accurately. Any allegations made are handled swiftly and appropriately.

p.3

3

Training for safeguarding leaders and for staff generally is regular, reflecting up-to-date government guidance. Staff have sound knowledge of the signs of concern. They know what to do and how to report concerns when they have them. Pupils and students also have good knowledge of how to report concerns and access help when required. They have confidence in the support and help offered by adults at the school. Where necessary, leaders are quick to refer concerns to, and seek support from, external agencies and bodies.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Although changes have been made to modern foreign languages provision in Years 7 to 9, the number of pupils taking and passing examinations in these subjects remains too low. Consequently, the number of pupils obtaining good grades in the EBacc subjects is not as high as it should be. Leaders should continue to develop provision for modern foreign languages so that significantly more pupils take and pass examinations in these subjects.  Although the school provides a broad curriculum and a good range of enrichment activities, pupils’ and students’ cultural knowledge is not always deepened as much as it might be. Senior leaders should work with subject leaders to identify how and where teaching might extend pupils’ and students’ knowledge, to enhance their understanding.  Some parents told inspectors that they needed more information about teaching and the curriculum, including around SEND and how pupils’ progress is reported.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

Additionally, while all necessary policies and information are available to parents, these are not always easy to access. In partnership with trustees and with parents, leaders should review the school’s methods and strategies for communication so that parents gain a better understanding of their children’s education. 4 and 5 May 2023

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually, this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour, or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.4

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in November 2017.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 4 and 5 May 2023

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10268579 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive School category Academy converter

p.5

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,534

p.5

form

Date of previous inspection 8 and 9 November 2017

p.5

Information about this school

 Since November 2017, there have been changes of headteacher and the CEO of the trust. The local governing body chair had been in post for one month at the time of this inspection.  This is a Church of England school, within the diocese of St Albans. The school’s provision for religious education and collective worship was last inspected under section 48 of the 2005 Education Act in May 2019. Its next inspection will be within eight school years.  The school makes use of two registered alternative education providers for a small number of pupils. This includes pupils who are dual registered at Tring School and the alternative provider. 4 and 5 May 2023

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders, other leaders, staff and pupils.  As part of evaluating the quality of leadership, the lead inspector met with the chair of the trust, the acting CEO, the chair of the local governing body and other governors.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, science, drama, history and modern foreign languages. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke with pupils about their learning and considered samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors explored other curriculum subjects through curriculum plans, discussions

p.6

Information about this inspection

with leaders, visits to lessons and sampling pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors checked the school’s single central record of recruitment vetting checks, considered its safeguarding policy and procedures, and spoke to leaders, staff and pupils.  Inspectors considered the 275 responses made by parents to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses submitted during the inspection. Inspectors also considered 111 responses made to the staff survey and 655 responses to the pupil survey.

p.6

Inspection team

Mark Phillips, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Brenda Watson Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 May 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion