Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

University of Southampton

Inspected 5 May 2023 · published 26 Jun 2023 · URN 70067

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Laurie Anderson (lead), Gary Holden, Linda Culling, Liz McIntosh

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 May 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Gary Holden, Laurie Anderson, Linda Culling, Liz McIntosh

  • Name on report verified

    University of Southampton

  • URN verified

    70067

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+96Very positivemore positive than 98% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexceptionalvery wellhighly effectivestrongambitiousexcellentoutstandingthrive

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
802
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%About the inspection 44%

Full report text

University of Southampton Building 34, Highfield Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire SO17 1BJ

p.1

Inspection judgements

Primary and secondary age-phase combined

p.1

Overall effectiveness Outstanding

The quality of education and training Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Outstanding

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees thrive on this programme because of the exceptional partnership between the provider and schools. They benefit from a seamless curriculum which coherently links learning in university sessions and through classroom experience. Trainees value how the programme is personalised for individuals and enriched by opportunities, including teaching in Kenya and Kuwait.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Expert tutors help trainees to acquire strong subject knowledge. Leaders’ focus on ‘What does this trainee need now?’ means that trainees are supported to systematically build detailed skills and knowledge over time. They are very well prepared to recognise their safeguarding responsibilities and to confidently promote high standards of behaviour.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees develop a secure understanding of meeting the needs of different groups of pupils. They learn how to adapt their teaching effectively and how to support individual pupils who have fallen behind to help them to keep up. Initially, trainees learn about these aspects of teaching through a phase focus before refining their understanding through the lens of individual subjects.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees are taught to be very reflective and engage critically with pertinent research which informs their teaching practice. Highly effective mentors skilfully guide trainees to reflect on their development. Leaders listen carefully to trainees’ views and provide tailored pastoral and professional support. Trainees are supported to foster efficiency to successfully manage their workload during the course and in their future careers.

p.1

Information about this ITE provider

◼ The University of Southampton offers several routes to gain qualified teacher status (QTS) in either primary or secondary education. Most trainees follow the university’s Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) route, training to teach either pupils aged four to 11 years or 11 to 16 years. A smaller proportion opt for the School Direct (SD) route, and over half of these receive some training from the Bitterne Park Teacher Training Alliance. All SD trainees study for a PGCE. The university also offers the assessment-only route into teaching. ◼ At the time of the inspection, there were 105 secondary and 39 primary trainees. Thirty of the secondary trainees were following the SD route. There were also nine assessment-only trainees. ◼ The provider works with 65 primary schools and 98 secondary schools across seven local authorities. Almost all partner schools were judged to be good or outstanding

p.2

Information about this ITE provider

by Ofsted at their most recent inspection.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ The inspection was conducted by two of His Majesty’s Inspectors and two Ofsted inspectors. ◼ Inspectors met with a range of leaders, including the director of initial teacher education, the directors of the primary and secondary programmes and subject tutors. The lead inspector also met with several members from the primary and secondary steering groups. ◼ Inspectors spoke with 33 trainees, 28 mentors, 15 early career teachers and 20 senior leaders or headteachers either remotely or in person. They visited eight schools in person. Inspectors took account of the views expressed in 69 inspection surveys returned by trainees and 86 returned by staff, including school-based staff who are involved in the programme. ◼ Inspectors carried out focused reviews in both phases to help them understand how well trainees are prepared to teach. In the primary phase, they focused on early reading, modern foreign languages and art and design. In the secondary phase, the

p.2

Information about this inspection

focus subjects were mathematics, modern foreign languages, physical education and geography.

p.2

better?

Leaders are highly effective and relentless in their efforts to continually improve the programme. They listen to feedback and take swift action to strengthen the quality of the provision for the benefit of trainees and schools. One headteacher reflected on the ‘total professional trust’ between the provider and schools to describe the positive and mutually beneficial relationship between schools and the provider. As a result, everyone works in a genuine partnership to develop trainees who are highly reflective, research-informed and consequently very well prepared to join the profession as early career teachers.

p.2

better?

Leaders have created an ambitious and effectively sequenced curriculum which is fully underpinned by the core content framework. Expert tutors support trainees to develop a rich understanding of subject and pedagogical content, alongside classroom practice. The curriculum is precisely interwoven between training at the centre and school placements to give trainees deliberate opportunities to practise skills of planning, teaching and assessing pupils’ learning. Mentors are very well acquainted with the content of the programme and expertly guide trainees to reflect on and apply this learning in different contexts. They help trainees to maintain a sharp focus on the high proportions of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language in the local community. In the primary phase, this is deeply enhanced at the start of the course through the ‘learning about teaching in school’ weeks. Trainees observe

p.3

better?

expert teachers model excellent classroom practice, with a focus on inclusion and behaviour management.

p.3

better?

Primary trainees benefit from first-rate training in how to teach early reading, including the use of systematic synthetic phonics. Tutors emphasise the importance of all pupils, including struggling readers, developing fluency through routine practice using decodable books. Trainees strengthen their understanding by completing carefully considered school- based tasks such as projects with individual pupils to improve their reading.

p.3

better?

Leaders’ approach to the formative assessment of trainees is a particular strength of the programme. They provide strong guidance to schools so that the assessment of trainees is closely linked to the curriculum that has been taught at each stage and target setting is precise. Mentors and tutors provide trainees with the right support at the right time to develop their subject knowledge and classroom practice. This process leads to a rigorous assessment at the end of the programme to support a recommendation for the award of QTS.

p.3

better?

The quality of mentoring is exceptional. Leaders make sure that the ambitious mentor training is securely understood and consistently enacted. Mentors work with trainees to identify what precise support or developmental activity they need each week to gradually build their detailed knowledge and skills. Leaders closely review the trainees’ development and mentoring support. Trainees appreciate the bespoke support they receive to help them to be successful. As one trainee reflected, ‘The culture of teacher training is of kindness and care, as well as pushing us to be the best teachers we can be.’

p.3

comply with the ITE compliance criteria?

◼ The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.

p.3

ITE provider details

Unique reference number 70067 Inspection number 10277963

p.4

ITE provider details

This inspection was carried out in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook’.

p.4

ITE provider details

This framework and handbook sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.

p.4

ITE provider details

Type of ITE provider Higher education institution Phases provided Primary and secondary combined Date of previous inspection 20 to 23 January 2014

p.4

Inspection team

Laurie Anderson, Lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Gary Holden Ofsted Inspector Linda Culling His Majesty’s Inspector Liz McIntosh Ofsted Inspector

p.4

Annex: Placement schools

Inspectors visited the following schools as part of this inspection:

p.5

Name URN ITE phases

Bitterne CE Primary School 116339 Primary Highfield CE Primary School 116395 Primary Ludlow Junior School 139027 Primary Redbridge Primary School 116123 Primary Bitterne Park School 116458 Secondary St George Catholic College 116507 Secondary The Hamble School 116413 Secondary The Toynbee School 116411 Secondary guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Name URN ITE phases

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.6

Name URN ITE phases

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Name URN ITE phases

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Name URN ITE phases

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion