Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 Jun 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Claire Price

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Claire Price

  • Postcode verified

    B97 4NU

  • Name on report verified

    St Luke's CofE First School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−10Mixedmore positive than 23% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progresshigh-qualityeffectivelystrengthsenjoymentclearpreciselyclearly
Criticismweaknessesrequires improvementnot alwaysnot well sequencednot yetdo not knownot clearlynot precisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings585w−8
  • What needs to improve199w−11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
782
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
7
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 25%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Sally Baker Headteacher St Luke's CofE First School Plymouth Road North Southcrest Redditch Worcestershire B97 4NU

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of St Luke's CofE First School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 4 May 2023, on behalf of His Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of St Luke's CofE First School

During the inspection, I discussed with you and your senior leader, the governors, a representative from the local authority, and a representative from the diocese, the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also conducted learning walks, spoke with staff, met with pupils, and met with subject leaders. I have considered this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of St Luke's CofE First School

St Luke’s Church of England First School continues to require improvement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the school to become good.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

 identify the important knowledge that pupils need to learn in all areas of the curriculum, and to sequence this effectively, so that pupils can build on their learning over time.

p.1

Main findings

There has been a significant change in leadership and in staffing since the previous inspection. You started as headteacher in September 2022. Prior to this, there had been a change in the governing body, including the appointment of a new chair and vice chair of governors. This change in leadership and governance meant that the changes that were needed did not start to take effect until your appointment.

p.2

Main findings

You have a clear vision for what you want for the pupils at St Luke’s. You have precisely identified the strengths and areas for development for the school and set about tackling the weaknesses that you have identified with determination and rigour. Some areas of this work have not yet had time to have the impact that you intend.

p.2

Main findings

You have started work on making sure that the curriculum sets out clearly what all pupils should know and remember. You rightly identify that this underpins the rest of the work that you need to do on the curriculum. In some subjects, subject leaders have identified the important learning that pupils need and have set this out in a logical order. In these subject areas, pupils build on their prior learning and make good progress through the curriculum. In other subjects, this important knowledge is not as clearly identified and sequenced and, at times, teachers do not make sure that their choice of teaching activity matches the knowledge that they want pupils to know. In these cases, pupils do not remember their learning as well as they could, and assessment is not used well enough to identify next steps for pupils. You have made sure that pupils who are ready to extend their learning are able to deepen and broaden their understanding of the topics being

p.2

Main findings

taught. However, where the curriculum is not as well sequenced as it could be, these activities chosen by teachers do not always provide pupils with the deeper knowledge that you would like.

p.2

Main findings

Since September, you have made reading a whole school priority. Pupils benefit from a high-quality phonics curriculum. Staff deliver this curriculum well. You have made sure that pupils are given books that match their phonic knowledge. As a result, more pupils are learning to read fluently. Leaders have reviewed the reading curriculum to make sure that all pupils have access to well-considered books. This has helped to promote pupils’ enjoyment of reading.

p.2

Main findings

You have reviewed the provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) to make sure that pupils get the help that they need. However, the needs of pupils are still not identified precisely enough and so teachers do not know how best to help them to access the curriculum. When their needs are not planned for well enough in lessons these pupils miss out on important learning. This is, in part, because the curriculum is not sequenced well enough.

p.2

Main findings

You value the support from the local authority and diocese to help improve the school. You find this support most helpful when it is aligned with the priorities you and the governors have identified.

p.2

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Worcester, the Department for Education's regional director and the director of children's services for Worcestershire local authority. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion