Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Jun 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Russell Bennett (lead), Cristalina Fernandes-Bates, Lisa Strong, Matea Marcinko

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Cristalina Fernandes-Bates, Lisa Strong, Matea Marcinko, Russell Bennett

  • Postcode verified

    DA16 1LB

  • Name on report verified

    Welling School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−13Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovingwell supportedconsistentaccurate
Criticismweaknessesseriousinconsistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
884
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Daniel Hatley Executive headteacher Welling School Elsa Road Welling Kent DA16 1LB

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Welling School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 4 and 5 May 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in February 2022.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Welling School

During the inspection, Russell Bennett, His Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), Matea Marcinko, His Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), Cristalina Fernandes-Bates, Ofsted Inspector (OI), Jan Shadick, Ofsted inspector (OI), and I discussed with you, senior leaders, the regional director of the multi-academy trust, staff, governors and pupils the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also met with subject leaders, visited lessons and looked at documentary evidence of improvement planning. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

designation

Since the last graded inspection of the school, in February, there have been several changes to the roles and responsibilities of senior leaders. In April 2023, a new headteacher and two deputy headteachers started working at the school. The school continues to offer a broad and balanced curriculum. This meets the ambition of the national curriculum. Curriculum thinking in many subjects is undergoing development. Staff are gaining confidence in their curricular thinking. In lessons you ensure that teachers check pupils’ understanding. Teaching staff ensure that pupils have more frequent opportunities for pupils to remember their prior learning. However, this is not routinely the case in all classes.

p.1

designation

Staff are better able to meet the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) than in the past. Pupils with SEND have contributed to the design of ‘pupil passports’ for pupils with SEND. As a result, the needs of pupils with SEND are taken more closely into account than was previously the case. You have provided training for staff in how to adapt their teaching to meet pupils’ individual needs. There is still some variability in how effectively staff support pupils with SEND across the school, especially in how well teachers use the ‘pupil passports’.

p.2

designation

You are developing a culture of reading in the school. Pupils take part in whole-class reading in tutor time and in English lessons. You recognise that there is still work to do with pupils to ensure that these sessions are used effectively. Recent training has focused on encouraging teachers to read out loud with expression. Pupils who need support with early reading receive phonics support.

p.2

designation

You have prioritised improving pupils’ behaviour. Typically, the school is a more orderly environment where pupils can learn better than before. Since the last inspection, you have focused on ensuring that uniform rules are followed more closely by pupils. You have also focused on improving behaviour and on reducing lateness to lessons. You have trained teachers to be more consistent in their application of the school’s behaviour policy. Pupils commented that behaviour is better but that it is inconsistently managed by some staff. They have greater confidence that staff will tackle bullying. For example, pupils use the online system for reporting bullying. Some pupils said that bullying continues to be an ongoing problem at the school.

p.2

designation

In February 2022, inspectors noted weaknesses in the school’s personal development and careers offer. Few pupils at that time took part in enrichment and extra-curricular clubs. Now you have put in place some clubs and activities, including sports and chess. You do not routinely track or monitor pupils’ uptake of these enrichment experiences. You have also ensured that a careers programme is established. However, this is not securely in place for pupils in Years 7 and 8. Your leaders are not tracking pupils’ careers opportunities carefully in order to increase coherence across the school.

p.2

designation

Staff are well supported in terms of their workload and well-being. The multi-academy trust (MAT) provides professional development opportunities for staff. A team of lead practitioners work with subject leaders and teachers to develop their curricular thinking and pedagogy. The trust has allocated time with a teaching and learning coach to the school. An inclusion expert has helped to develop SEND provision. The regional director visits the school regularly to monitor progress. The appointment of new senior leaders from April this year has helped to strengthen the leadership team.

p.2

designation

The governing body is well informed about the progress the school has made and what the next steps are. The governing body visits the school frequently. It seeks the views of pupils, and parents and carers.

p.3

designation

You and the senior team have an accurate view of where the school is and what needs to improve further. You have high ambitions for pupils at the school but there is much work to do for these to be fully realised.

p.3

designation

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chief executive officer of the TKAT multi-academy trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Bexley. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion