Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 16 Jun 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rachel Henrick

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Rachel Henrick

  • Postcode verified

    DY8 5PY

  • Name on report verified

    Fairhaven Primary School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−28Mixedmore positive than 10% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyenjoyengagingpreciselyconsiderate
Criticismnot yetrequires improvementinconsistencieslackinsufficientslowly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings477w−25
  • What needs to improve203w−25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
679
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
7
typical 8
Hedged sentences
21%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%What needs to improve 30%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Thomas Garner Headteacher Fairhaven Primary School Barnett Lane Wordsley Stourbridge West Midlands DY8 5PY

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Fairhaven Primary School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 4 May 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Fairhaven Primary School

During the inspection, I discussed with you, other senior leaders, a representative of the local governing body and a representative of the local authority, the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. I also met with teachers, visited a sample of phonics and geography lessons, spoke to pupils and scrutinised school improvement plans and governor meeting minutes. I also looked at a sample of pupils’ work and listened to pupils read to a familiar adult. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

made progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the

The school should take further action to:

p.1

made progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the

 Ensure that plans for improvement are tightly focused on the actions that are most needed in order to ensure improvement, and that they include precisely defined intended outcomes and sufficiently urgent deadlines for implementation.

p.1

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, there have been a number of changes to staffing and governance. Areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection are being addressed, but some of the improvements have been implemented slowly and are not as sharply focused on the right things as they could be.

p.2

Main findings

You have rightly prioritised pupils’ reading by adopting a new phonics scheme and, more recently, purchasing additional reading materials. Staff have received appropriate training to deliver the new phonics scheme. However, there remain some inconsistencies in how phonics is taught. You have identified that some extra support is needed to ensure that all teachers deliver phonics consistently well. Nonetheless, pupils enjoy learning to read. Sensibly, you have purchased new reading books to enable all pupils to practise reading using books matched to the sounds they know and are learning.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last inspection, you have focused on rewriting your curriculum to ensure that it is coherent and sequenced. Leaders are now identifying the key knowledge that they want pupils to learn and the order in which they should learn it. The implementation of this work is in its infancy and has not yet had the impact you intend. For example, in some lessons, pupils are learning new content when they do not have the basics in place. You are also introducing strategies to help pupils remember more, over time. Again, this work is quite new and not yet embedded.

p.2

Main findings

There have been changes to the governing body since the previous inspection. New members are focusing on their training to ensure that they have the right skills to hold you to account. Governors are now undertaking visits to school to triangulate what leaders tell them. Importantly, they are also beginning to challenge leaders appropriately by asking questions about the information they are given.

p.2

Main findings

You, your leadership team and staff are committed to bringing about improvements. You have identified priorities for improvement, broadly based on the areas identified at the previous inspection. You have produced a series of development plans, with the support of an external consultant. However, some of these plans, despite being lengthy, lack the precision and the detail needed to define the desired outcomes. As a result, insufficient focus is given to some of the important areas in need of improvement.

p.2

Main findings

You have been proactive in engaging a range of external support. Subject leaders appreciate the time and support they have received to begin developing their subject areas. Staff feel that leaders are considerate of their well-being. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Dudley. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion