Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Heckington St Andrew's Church of England School

Inspected — · published 15 Jun 2023 · URN 120526

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anita Denman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anita Denman

  • Postcode verified

    NG34 9RX

  • Name on report verified

    Heckington St Andrew’s Church of England School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisewell sequencedconsistentlypositiveconfidentlystrengthsrobustclearprecise
Criticismnot yetrequires improvement

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings740w+25
  • What needs to improve35w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
774
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 95%What needs to improve 5%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Judith Bentley Headteacher Heckington St Andrew’s Church of England School Howell Road Heckington Sleaford Lincolnshire NG34 9RX

p.1

Church of England School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 4 May 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Church of England School

During the inspection, I discussed with you and your assistant headteacher, governors and the local authority the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited lessons, met with teachers and pupils, looked at pupils’ work and scrutinised a range of documents. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

improvement. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more

work is necessary for the school to become good.

p.1

improvement. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more

The school should take further action to:

p.1

improvement. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more

 ensure that assessment consistently assists teachers in determining clear next steps for pupils in the wider subject areas.

p.1

Main findings

Since the last inspection, there have been changes to the senior leadership team. Two key stage leaders were appointed in January 2023. This has increased the capacity of leaders to make the necessary improvements.

p.2

Main findings

You and your leaders acted quickly to address some of the areas for improvement identified during the last inspection. You have sought the advice from an education specialist and have worked hard to implement the changes required. You have ensured that the curriculum, including reading, is well sequenced and builds on the knowledge pupil should know over time. Teachers say that the changes to the curriculum have helped them to plan their lessons, as they now know what has been taught previously and what is coming next. Not all wider subjects are planned from the early years.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have reviewed how they promote reading for pleasure to all pupils. They have purchased new books. They have mapped out the texts they want each year group to listen to or read each year. Leaders are now working on developing reading areas for all classes.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have ensured that, in lessons, pupils have regular opportunities to think about knowledge they have learned previously. Training on how pupils learn has helped teachers understand how best to help pupils to retain knowledge. This is having a positive impact in terms of pupils knowing and remembering more of what they learn. However, the use of assessment in the foundation subjects does not yet help teachers to identify what pupils need to learn next. Leaders have identified those pupils who have been adversely affected by the pandemic. They have ensured that these pupils receive the support they need to catch up.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils speak confidently about their learning. They are beginning to make connections between their current and previous learning. For example, pupils understand that their knowledge of units of time can help them with mathematical word problems. Pupils use key vocabulary and understand that the different sections of their lessons encourage them to think more deeply.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have sought specialist advice to improve the provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). They have started to introduce pupil passports, the aim of which is to provide information about pupils’ additional needs and the support that will best help them to learn. These passports are not yet in place for all pupils with SEND. Leaders have ensured that teachers have received training on how to make these pupils’ targets more precise. Teachers ensure that the activities they set pupils with SEND match what they want these pupils to learn. They are beginning to adapt their teaching to meet the needs of all pupils with SEND.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders and those responsible for governance have an accurate view of the strengths of the school and the areas for improvement. Governors have supported leaders to improve the quality of education. There are robust plans in place to ensure that leaders continue to make the required improvements. Governors monitor these plans to check the impact of leaders’ actions.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders value the support of representatives of the local authority who have assisted with curriculum development and implementation, subject leadership and the early years provision.

p.3

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of the Church of England, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Lincolnshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion