Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Setting
Summary
Julian Appleyard (lead), Eleanor Belfield
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Eleanor Belfield, Julian Appleyard
- Postcode verified
HX5 0QG
- Name on report verified
The Brooksbank School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I am of the opinion that the school may appoint early career teachers. p.1
- There have been a number of changes to staffing, including at senior leadership level, since the graded inspection in February 2022. p.2
- Additional leaders have been appointed to the senior leadership and pastoral teams. p.2
- A second deputy headteacher has taken up post and a new interim headteacher has recently been appointed. p.2
- The interim headteacher is the chief executive officer of the Together Learning Trust (TLT). p.2
- The process for the school to join the TLT is well underway. p.2
- During this monitoring inspection, we focused on the recommendations from the previous graded inspection which related to the school’s safeguarding arrangements, the behaviour of pupils, and leaders’ oversight of these aspects. p.2
- New leaders have accurately identified the underlying causes of the safeguarding concerns raised at the previous inspection. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,294
- about usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
David Lord Interim Headteacher The Brooksbank School Victoria Road Elland West Yorkshire HX5 0QG
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of The Brooksbank School
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 5 and 6 October 2022, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require special measures following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in February 2022.
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of The Brooksbank School
During the inspection, Julian Appleyard, Ofsted Inspector (OI), and I discussed with you and other senior leaders the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We held meetings with different groups of staff, spoke with pupils, visited lessons and scrutinised a range of documents, including important safeguarding records. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of The Brooksbank School
The Brooksbank School remains inadequate and requires special measures.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
necessary for the category of concern to be removed.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
I am of the opinion that the school may appoint early career teachers.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
ensure that robust systems are in place so that those pupils who are too often absent are supported to attend school regularly. ensure the effective implementation of an appropriate personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) curriculum so that pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain.
p.1
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
There have been a number of changes to staffing, including at senior leadership level, since the graded inspection in February 2022. Additional leaders have been appointed to the senior leadership and pastoral teams. A second deputy headteacher has taken up post and a new interim headteacher has recently been appointed. The interim headteacher is the chief executive officer of the Together Learning Trust (TLT). The process for the school to join the TLT is well underway.
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
During this monitoring inspection, we focused on the recommendations from the previous graded inspection which related to the school’s safeguarding arrangements, the behaviour of pupils, and leaders’ oversight of these aspects.
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
New leaders have accurately identified the underlying causes of the safeguarding concerns raised at the previous inspection. Leaders have taken the right steps at the right time to bring about much-needed change. While it is too early to see the impact of some of their work, the significant improvements in safeguarding and behaviour are clear.
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
As a result of leaders’ actions, safeguarding at the school is now effective and pupils are kept safe. Following the last inspection, leaders took immediate action to address the most serious concerns. There has been a complete overhaul of safeguarding systems and processes. Leaders have provided comprehensive safeguarding training for all staff. As a result, staff know the safeguarding risks that pupils face. Staff know how to report any concerns about pupils’ well-being and safety. Leaders follow up these concerns promptly. Many pupils are now more confident to voice any concerns that they have. There are strong systems to monitor these responses. Leaders use this information, together with wider information about behaviour and attendance, to check that they have an accurate picture of pupils’ well-being.
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
Staff know which pupils are vulnerable. They have strong oversight of these pupils. Reasonable adjustments are made to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). However, there is more work to do to strengthen the communication between the pastoral team and the SEND team regarding suspensions. Leaders must ensure that relevant information is shared between departments in a timely fashion so leaders can assure themselves of the appropriateness of decisions, particularly those regarding suspensions of pupils with SEND. The school’s in-house alternative provision ‘The Link’ has been transformed. It has re-opened as a safe and welcoming space where pupils are well looked after and undertake meaningful work.
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
Leaders have ensured improvements to the safety of pupils on the school site. Staff are routinely visible around the site at social times and between lessons. This has helped to reduce truancy and improve punctuality. Pupils and staff agree that the school is a much safer place than at the time of the last inspection. There are rarely any fights, and pupils know the importance of reporting any concerns to a trusted adult. Younger pupils are confident that staff would help them with any worries they have. Some older pupils are more reluctant to ask for help or to report an incident. A few pupils are still not confident that all staff would take effective action.
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
Leaders have taken swift action to improve pupils’ behaviour. A new behaviour policy sets out leaders’ high expectations. New arrangements for breaktimes and lunchtimes have brought a sense of order to social times. However, despite highly visible staff, some pupils continue to be concerned at the behaviour of others. For example, some pupils continue to be worried by crowded corridors. A few pupils persist in showing a lack of respect for school rules and for each other. We witnessed some of this unruly behaviour. Senior staff model the consistent approach they expect staff to take. However, despite this, a small number of staff do not address poor behaviour in line with leaders’ expectations.
p.3
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
As a result of improved systems to record behaviour incidents, leaders are beginning to analyse a wider set of information. They consider the reasons behind incidents and use information to help pupils who struggle with their behaviour more effectively. There are increasing numbers of ‘success stories’ for some pupils who now engage successfully with their learning as a result of the support they receive. Pupils receive clear messages that derogatory language is not to be tolerated. Staff routinely challenge pupils when they hear this language. This work is beginning to have an impact. Although pupils are increasingly punctual to lessons, a number of pupils do not have high enough levels of attendance. Leaders have strengthened the systems to analyse data about attendance. This helps leaders to make informed decisions about how to improve attendance for these pupils. New staffing appointments mean that there is robust follow-up and support. It is
p.3
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
too soon for leaders to have the evidence that their work is having a sustained impact.
p.3
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
Pupils were happy to speak with us. They conducted themselves well in discussions and listened thoughtfully to each other’s views. However, pupils are not being well prepared for life in modern Britain. Although pupils are clear that respect and tolerance for others are important, this clarity does not stem from a secure knowledge of protected characteristics, or other aspects of the PSHE curriculum. A new curriculum is in its infancy. Leaders have plans to further refine it so that it builds an understanding of tolerance, respect, the development of character and a considered appreciation of difference and differing cultures.
p.3
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
As a result of the serious safeguarding concerns raised in the last report, school leaders, including governors, have received external support. There have been focused support and additional capacity at a leadership level from Education Exchange and from the TLT. Leaders value these associations and draw on their continued support as they build sustainable change. Staff, parents and pupils recognise how far the school has come from a low starting point. Some parents remain concerned, but many recognise that the school has ‘turned a corner’. Leaders need to engage more effectively with the whole community so that parents are aware of leaders’ work to improve the school and share in their successes. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Calderdale. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion