Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Hartest Church of England Primary School

Inspected — · published 26 May 2023 · URN 144215

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adam Cooke

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Adam Cooke

  • Postcode verified

    IP29 4DL

  • Name on report verified

    Hartest Church of England Primary School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+28Mostly positivemore positive than 62% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivehigh expectationsclearlyswiftlyenjoyconsistentlyrespectfuleffective
Criticismat riskconcernfall behindconcernsharmnot positivenot clearlynot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings178w0
  • What needs to improve835w+28

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,007
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 47
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 18%What needs to improve 82%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Amanda Woolmer Executive Headteacher Hartest Church of England Primary School The Row Hartest Bury St Edmunds Suffolk IP29 4DL

p.1

School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 28 and 29 March 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require special measures following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in September 2021.

p.1

School

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, the CEO of the multi-academy trust, other staff, trustees and governors the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also carried out visits to lessons, meetings with other staff, work and other documentation scrutiny. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

special measures. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but

more work is necessary for the category of concern to be removed.

p.1

special measures. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but

I am of the opinion that the school may appoint early career teachers.

p.1

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

A new head of school and a new special educational needs coordinator have been in post since September 2022.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

You continue to take appropriate steps to improve the quality of education. In most areas of the curriculum, leaders have now clearly defined the knowledge pupils will learn. This knowledge is linked more precisely to what pupils have learned before. This helps pupils to grasp ideas better. In mathematics, for example, most pupils apply their knowledge to solve more complex problems. You and the trust have continued to provide training to strengthen teachers’ subject knowledge. As a result, most teachers ensure pupils regularly practise previously learned knowledge. This helps pupils to remember knowledge better. Most teachers now break learning down into smaller stages so that pupils understand knowledge thoroughly. Teachers check pupils’ learning regularly. They identify misconceptions and mistakes pupils make. They receive support so that they learn better. In some areas of the curriculum, knowledge is less clearly defined. You have plans

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

to swiftly address this so that pupils learn well across the curriculum.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Children and younger pupils continue to learn to read well. Pupils enjoy reading. You have informed parents of how they can support their child to read at home. Pupils have much practise of reading at school and at home. As a result, children quickly become fluent readers. You regularly check how well pupils read. You provide precise support for those who fall behind with their reading. This helps pupils to catch up.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Since the last monitoring visit, you and the trust have provided training so that teachers understand better how to adapt the curriculum for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Staff now identify pupils’ needs more accurately. You and leaders review how well teachers help pupils with SEND to better follow the curriculum. Some of the guidance leaders provide for teachers is still not precise enough to help some pupils in receipt of an education, health and care plan learn as well as they should. As a result, their learning slows.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Most pupils behave well in lessons and around the school. The majority of pupils demonstrate positive attitudes. They interact well and support each other in lessons. They play fairly at break and lunchtime. Pupils are ready to learn and participate enthusiastically in lessons. A small minority of pupils, at times, demonstrate less positive behaviours and attitudes to others. When this happens, some teachers do not swiftly manage these behaviours, and their behaviour disrupts learning. You are currently refining the school’s behaviour policy. You acknowledge the need for more clearly defined consequences for negative behaviours. Staff must receive training to apply these more consistently.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

You continue to strengthen provision to enrich pupils’ wider development. Pupils appreciate a broad range of clubs and extra-curricular activities. Pupils play chess and other board games. Pupils hone their performing skills with help from the local theatre. Pupils have many opportunities to develop their sporting prowess. Participation is high, especially among pupils with SEND and those in receipt of pupil premium. This ensures that pupils develop important additional skills. The ‘Skeko’ council allows pupils to share their views about the school. You have adopted their suggestions to make the school more environmentally friendly.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The early years curriculum now provides a firm foundation for future learning. Teachers present knowledge very clearly and provide opportunities for children to practise what they have learned. As a result, pupils gain new language quickly and make sense of the world around them. Children behave well and develop respectful attitudes because of their teachers’ high expectations.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Safeguarding continues to be effective. Staff report concerns promptly, and you respond swiftly. You continue to work with a range of outside agencies to ensure that pupils at risk of harm and abuse receive the support they need. Pupils are safe.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Since the last monitoring visit, the trust has continued to provide appropriate support, and this has led to improvements, particularly for the curriculum and early years. Leaders, governors and trustees regularly check on how well provision is improving. At times, there is a need to evaluate the impact of actions more rigorously, especially around behaviour. This will ensure an even more robust evaluation of school life. Teachers appreciate how you have supported them to implement the curriculum. They find their workload reasonable. The parents I spoke to during my visit were positive about how the school provides for their children. There is sufficient capacity within the school and the trust for you to continue to improve further.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body and the CEO of the St Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocesan Multi-Academy Trust, the director of education for the Diocese of St Edmundsbury and Ipswich, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Suffolk. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion