Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Bradford College

Inspected 30 Mar 2023 · published 26 May 2023 · URN 70134

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Mar 2023

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Alex Thorp, Alison Stephenson, Eleanor Belfield, Karen Anderson, Michele Costello, Richard Jones

  • Postcode verified

    BD7 1AY

  • Name on report verified

    Bradford College

  • URN verified

    70134

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectiveeffectivelyambitiouswell preparedwell supportedclearconsiderate
Criticismnot clearvariationnot effectivelacknot stronggaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1701w+57
  • What needs to improve628w+59

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,304
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
24%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%What needs to improve 19%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Bradford College Lister Building, Great Horton Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD7 1AY

p.1

Inspection judgements

Primary age- phase Secondary age-phase Further education age- phase

p.1

Inspection judgements

The quality of education and training Good Good Good

p.1

Inspection judgements

Leadership and management Good Good Good

p.1

Inspection judgements

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good Good N/A

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees benefit from a training programme that foregrounds the needs of disadvantaged pupils and those who face additional barriers to their learning. In many programmes, leaders actively recruit trainees from the local area to meet the need for teachers in Bradford. On a wider level, the partnership supports teacher apprentices across the country for those seeking an employer-led route into the profession.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees are well prepared for the day-to-day realities of the classroom. Much centre-based training replicates the classroom environment so that trainees can apply the theories they have been taught. They learn how to manage behaviour and how to meet the wider needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Trainees receive particularly strong guidance on how to support pupils who speak English as an additional language. In the primary phase, trainees learn how to teach early reading well. Trainees are well prepared to teach their phase and subject, despite some gaps in disciplinary knowledge for secondary trainees.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Most trainees feel well supported at college and in their placement providers. Leaders use the views of trainees to inform future training and support. Leaders are considerate of trainees’ workload and well-being.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Course leaders have mapped out the training programme well. Trainees have clear milestones to reach on their route to qualified teacher status. Trainees appreciate the support and guidance of their mentors. This is strengthened by effective communication with their link tutors. For apprentices, communication between school mentors and some professional tutors is less effective.

p.1

Information about this ITE provider

◼ In the 2022/23 academic year, the Bradford College partnership had 345 trainees and apprentices across the primary, secondary and further education and skills phases of training. ◼ There were 125 trainees in the primary phase, 24 trainees in the secondary phase and 51 trainees in the further education and skills phase. In addition, there were 78 primary teaching apprenticeships and 67 secondary teaching apprenticeships. ◼ Trainees train to teach in the primary phase through the following routes: an undergraduate three-year Bachelor of Arts with Honours in Primary Education with qualified teacher status (QTS) which covers the three to 11 age-phase or a postgraduate certificate in education (PGCE) to Masters level. These are delivered through Bradford College. There is also a level 6 teaching apprenticeship route with QTS. ◼ In the secondary phase, trainees follow either a PGCE route or the level 6 teacher

p.2

Information about this ITE provider

apprenticeship standard. This is delivered through the college. In 2022/23, secondary trainees were enrolled on the following subject courses: biology, chemistry, computing, health and social care, mathematics, psychology and social sciences. ◼ In the further education and skills phase, trainees follow the Postgraduate diploma in education and training which is taught by the college and validated by the University of Bolton. Trainees follow either in-service or pre-service programmes. ◼ At the time of the inspection, there were four candidates, across the primary and secondary phases, on the Assessment-only route. ◼ In the primary phase, the partnership covers 42 schools, ranging from outstanding to requires improvement, across seven local authorities ◼ In the secondary phase, the partnership covers five schools and colleges, ranging from outstanding to requires improvement, across five local authorities.

p.2

Information about this ITE provider

◼ In the further education and skills phase, the partnership covers six providers across two local authorities ◼ The level 6 teacher apprenticeship is delivered on a national basis, covering an area from Newcastle to Brighton. Approximately one third of these apprentices are in the North of England, with two thirds in the Midlands and the South of England.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ The inspection was carried out by nine of His Majesty’s Inspectors and one Ofsted inspector. ◼ During the inspection, the inspectors met a range of college staff and members of the partnership. These included: the college principal and chief executive officer; the vice- principal; the head of education and social care; apprenticeship leaders; the head of the school of education; primary, secondary and further education and skills phase leads; subject leads; link tutors; professional tutors; the partnership manager; the college safeguarding team; members of the academic and learning support teams; the partnership steering group; members of the college corporation (governance); headteachers; members of school staff; and school mentors. ◼ In the primary phase, inspectors completed focused reviews in early reading and phonics, mathematics, physical education, religious education and science. They visited

p.2

Information about this inspection

eight schools. One of these visits was carried out remotely. Inspectors spoke with 15 trainees and five early career teachers. In total, inspectors spoke to 54 trainees and/or school staff in 27 schools. Inspectors visited two centre-based taught sessions where they talked to university staff and trainees. ◼ In the secondary phase, inspectors completed focused reviews in chemistry, history, English, mathematics and psychology. Secondary inspectors visited five schools. They held additional meetings with trainees in college and online. In total, inspectors spoke with 26 trainees and six early career teachers. ◼ In the further education and skills phase, inspectors completed focused reviews in art, English and SEND. They visited three further education providers. In total, inspectors spoke with 21 trainees and five early career teachers. ◼ Inspectors reviewed a wide range of documentation relating to the ITE programmes in

p.3

Information about this inspection

the primary, secondary and further education and skills phases. This included: subject curriculum documentation, information about mentoring and assessment, records of mentor meetings and target setting and leaders’ self-evaluation document. In addition, inspectors reviewed examples of training materials, including the online platform to support apprentices. ◼ Inspectors considered provision for candidates following the Assessment-only route. Primary phase report

p.3

better?

Course leaders work well with schools to design and implement a well-considered ITE curriculum. The programme is aligned with the Department for Education’s core content framework and includes pertinent research to prepare trainees for the teaching profession.

p.4

better?

Leaders ensure that trainees develop a detailed knowledge of the national curriculum and its expectations. Trainees deepen their understanding of each subject and how to teach it through carefully chosen ‘theory-to-practice’ tasks. Mentors and link tutors encourage trainees to reflect well on their practice. However, some school mentors lack the detailed understanding of the taught course needed to fully reinforce the programme.

p.4

better?

Trainees develop a deep understanding of strategies to support pupils at the early stages of learning to read. Work in college is supplemented effectively with additional ‘curriculum- in-action’ days where trainees visit schools to see for themselves the practices that they learn about.

p.4

better?

Trainees develop secure knowledge of adaptive teaching and strategies to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Trainees complete tasks on placement that help them to understand some of the needs of pupils in their classes. However, some trainees do not learn enough about how to support pupils with complex SEND needs.

p.4

better?

Leaders place high importance on safeguarding. Thorough initial training and well- considered placement tasks enable trainees to understand the risks that pupils might face. All trainees complete an accredited course to understand how to help pupils use the internet safely.

p.4

better?

Assessment of trainees is appropriate and purposeful. On placement, weekly meetings with mentors enable trainees to understand their progress and next steps. For trainees on the undergraduate and postgraduate routes, link tutors provide effective oversight and quality assurance of the work of mentors in schools.

p.4

better?

Leaders take great care in recruiting trainees onto the apprenticeship route. They work with employers to map out the new knowledge, skills and behaviours trainees will develop. However, there is some variation in the quality of support and feedback from professional tutors for trainees on this route. Because of this, some mentors and trainees are not clear about course expectations. Leaders’ quality assurance processes do not identify this variation in the quality of support from professional tutors sharply enough.

p.4

better?

Leaders seek the views of trainees and act on their feedback. This has led to some improvement action. For example, trainees suggested that they would like more sessions to develop their subject knowledge to help them teach religious education, which leaders have provided. Trainees are positive about their training experience. They say that staff are approachable and considerate of workload and their well-being. Leaders are mindful of trainees’ personal circumstances and provide strong pastoral support for trainees when required.

p.4

(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)

◼ The ITE curriculum does not provide enough opportunities for trainees to develop their knowledge of some complex areas of SEND. Leaders should ensure that programme leaders strengthen trainees’ understanding of pupils with more complex SEND needs and strategies for adapting teaching to support these pupils. ◼ Some mentors do not understand the specific content of the taught curriculum well enough to maximise opportunities to help trainees integrate their learning from the taught content into their practice in schools. Leaders should ensure that all mentors better understand the theories and pedagogies that trainees are taught to help trainees practise and apply these on placement. ◼ Leaders have not considered carefully enough how they quality assure the work of professional tutors and mentors for trainees on the apprenticeship route. This means that they have not recognised variations in practice promptly enough. Leaders should

p.5

(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)

improve how they quality assure the work of mentors and partnership tutors so that any variation in the effectiveness of support can be quickly addressed.

p.5

compliance criteria?

◼ The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.

p.5

principles and requirements of apprenticeship provision?

◼ The provider meets the principles and requirements of apprenticeship provision in the primary phase.

p.5

principles and requirements of apprenticeship provision?

The provider undertakes a comprehensive and thorough assessment of trainees’ learning needs at the start of the apprenticeship course. Mentors provide effective on-the-job training and are clear about the end-point assessment that trainees are working towards. College leaders ensure that trainees are provided with sufficient time to complete the well- crafted online course modules to help trainees develop their understanding of theory and research to support their development as teachers. Professional tutors undertake periodic ‘milestone’ checks to ensure that trainees are acquiring the knowledge, skills and behaviours necessary to enter the teaching profession. Secondary phase report

p.5

better?

Leaders have designed a curriculum that is ambitious and underpinned by the Department for Education’s core content framework. This curriculum aligns well with leaders’ vision to challenge disadvantage and nurture potential in the Bradford area. There is a strong focus on inclusion and diversity woven through the ITE curriculum. Trainees learn about how best to support pupils who speak English as an additional language. Leaders ensure that trainees regularly reflect on their own progress and experiences. Schools recognise this as a distinctive feature of the trainees from Bradford College.

p.6

better?

Leaders ensure that the curriculum is designed effectively around subject and phase for most trainees. Trainees on the postgraduate route value the subject-specific days that they attend in college. In some subjects, the content chosen deepens trainees’ subject knowledge. In some instances, trainees do not learn enough about current debates and aspects of disciplinary knowledge in their subjects.

p.6

better?

Leaders ensure that the curriculum is informed by current educational theory. Trainees are explicitly taught about how pupils learn and are then supported to apply their knowledge in the classroom. Leaders model effective teaching strategies when teaching trainees so that trainees can use these strategies in their own teaching. To allow them to apply their knowledge, trainees practise teaching their peers from other subject routes. This gives them the opportunity to apply the pedagogy and behaviour management strategies that they have learned. Leaders and mentors track trainees’ journey through the curriculum and assess their progression well.

p.6

better?

The vast majority of trainees appreciate the strong support they receive from their college tutors and school-based mentors. Some have experienced frustrations with the timeliness of their school placements. Most schools have a clear understanding of what the ITE curriculum covers and when. All PGCE mentors are provided with curriculum information and have access to online platforms which host curriculum resources and documents that track trainees’ progression through the ITE curriculum. Mentors are involved in the ‘theory to practice’ tasks that postgraduate trainees complete, which are closely tied to the curriculum content they have studied. Leaders have introduced structures to ensure the quality of mentoring that trainees receive. This involves regular checks of documentation and college tutors carrying out joint observations with mentors. Most mentors find these observations a valuable process, while others disagree. There is some variation in the

p.6

better?

quality of guidance that trainees and mentors receive from professional tutors on the apprenticeship route. While there are strengths in aspects of quality assurance, systems do not identify variations in the effectiveness of professional tutors’ work quickly enough.

p.6

phase?

[Information for the provider and appropriate authority ]

p.7

phase?

◼ In some areas, the ITE curriculum does not provide enough opportunities for trainees to develop their knowledge of the richness of their subject content, particularly disciplinary knowledge. As a result, trainees on some routes do not develop their subject knowledge as fully as they could. Leaders should ensure that programme leaders work together to develop the subject-specific content across all subject specialisms. ◼ Some mentors of trainees on the apprenticeship route are less clear on how to align their training and support with that provided by the college. Leaders should ensure that all mentors fully understand all aspects of the ITE curriculum and their role in reinforcing this. ◼ Leaders’ quality assurance systems do not identify some of the variances in the quality of support provided by professional tutors on the apprenticeship route. Leaders should refine how they check the work of partnership tutors so that any variation in the

p.7

phase?

effectiveness of support can be quickly addressed.

p.7

phase?

◼ Does the ITE provider’s secondary phase comply with the ITE compliance

p.7

criteria?

◼ The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.

p.7

principles and requirements of apprenticeship provision?

◼ The provider meets the principles and requirements of apprenticeship provision in the secondary phase.

p.7

principles and requirements of apprenticeship provision?

The provider carries out a thorough assessment of trainees’ knowledge, skills and behaviours before they begin the course. Their individual needs are then carefully considered throughout their apprenticeship. Mentors ensure that trainees are well supported to implement their online learning from college modules. Trainees value the online college provision where they learn about educational theory and research. Professional tutors carry out periodic ‘milestone’ checks, alongside mentors, to ensure that trainees are gaining the necessary knowledge, skills and behaviours to enter the teaching profession. On occasions, communication between some professional tutors and school mentors is not strong enough on this route. Further education and skills phase report

p.7

needs to be done better?

Leaders implement an ambitious and well-integrated curriculum that recognises well the dual role of the trainee as a teacher and subject expert. They ensure that trainees develop the knowledge, skills and professional behaviours that they will need to teach their subject well in the further education and skills sector. For example, leaders add guidance on teaching English for speakers of other languages to English pathways. This helps trainees to better support the individual language needs of their learners.

p.8

needs to be done better?

Lead tutors sequence modules in a sensible way. They start with teaching strategies and support trainees well to debate and critically evaluate different approaches before moving to the more complex area of curriculum design. Most trainees successfully apply pedagogical theory to their subject practice. In a few instances, mentors encourage trainees to apply theories to their practice in uncritical ways, without considering that some theories may be contested or no longer thought to be valid.

p.8

needs to be done better?

Programme leaders make good use of the feedback they receive from trainees. They use the information from trainee surveys to shape and influence the sequencing, content and assessment of modules to help trainees know more and remember more over time. For example, programme leaders have made changes to the assessment of trainees to help the trainees to improve the standard of their work and to reduce trainee workload.

p.8

needs to be done better?

Programme leaders work well with most mentors to ensure they understand their role. Most mentors provide trainees with useful support and guidance that helps the trainees to improve their subject knowledge and skills. For example, in SEND provision, mentors teach trainees about using education, health and care plans to plan and provide effective training for learners with high needs. However, a minority of mentors provide less effective feedback on aspects of trainees’ classroom management practice.

p.8

needs to be done better?

Lead tutors provide helpful feedback to trainees on their teaching practice. For example, lead tutors help trainees to become more skilful in their use of assessment. Trainees know why, when and how to assess more accurately in their subject. Most trainees assess effectively whether learners understand key concepts and topics that they teach them.

p.8

needs to be done better?

Most trainees benefit from centre-based training that provides them with useful knowledge about teaching learners with SEND and use a range of adaptive teaching strategies effectively. As a result, most trainees are better able to plan teaching, learning and assessment that is inclusive for all learners.

p.8

(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)

◼ The curriculum for trainees is shaped and influenced by pertinent and up-to-date research. Programme leaders identify and teach current theories that support trainees in practice. However, in a very few instances, mentors use some theories and approaches in an uncritical way. Leaders should ensure that trainees have the knowledge and critical awareness to question the validity of educational research and theory and how to apply this to their own work. ◼ In some instances, mentors do not provide clear feedback to trainees on their classroom practice. This can limit trainees’ ability to reflect on what went well and what could improve. Leaders should work with mentors to help trainees to receive consistently effective feedback that enables them to reflect upon and improve their classroom practice.

p.8

ITE provider details

Unique reference number 70134 Inspection number 10264122

p.10

ITE provider details

This inspection was carried out in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook’.

p.10

ITE provider details

This framework and handbook sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.

p.10

ITE provider details

Type of ITE provider School-centred initial teacher training Phases provided Primary Secondary Further education and skills Date of previous inspection 11 to 14 June 2018 (Primary) 12 to 15 May 2014 (Secondary)

p.10

Inspection team

Malcolm Kirtley, Overall lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Tim Scargill-Knight, Phase lead inspector (primary) His Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Katherine Spurr, Phase lead inspector (secondary) His Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Chloe Rendall, Phase lead inspector (further education) His Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Alex Thorp His Majesty’s Inspector Alison Stephenson His Majesty’s Inspector Eleanor Belfield His Majesty’s Inspector Karen Anderson His Majesty’s Inspector Michele Costello Ofsted Inspector Richard Jones His Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Annex: Placement/employment schools and colleges

Inspectors visited the following schools and colleges as part of this inspection:

p.11

Name URN ITE phases

Atlas Community Primary School 143565 Primary Dixons Allerton Academy 135866 Primary Jewell Academy (Virtual) 139692 Primary Margaret McMillan Primary School 143568 Primary Peel Park Primary School 101494 Primary Pudsey Bolton Royd Primary School 107845 Primary Reevy Hill Primary School 143511 Primary St William’s Catholic Primary School 107330 Primary Bradford College 130532 Secondary and FES Carlton Bolling School 147100 Secondary Chase High School (Virtual) 131146 Secondary Horsforth High School 137775 Secondary Laisterdyke Leadership Academy 142681 Secondary Oastlers School (Virtual) 138099 FES guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Name URN ITE phases

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.12

Name URN ITE phases

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.12

Name URN ITE phases

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.12

Name URN ITE phases

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion