Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 May 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

James Oldham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    James Oldham

  • Postcode verified

    TA10 9SS

  • Name on report verified

    Huish Episcopi Academy This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−1Mixedmore positive than 31% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh expectationsclearpositivefeel safeconfidentrespectfulsafe
Criticismconcernsunacceptableineffectiveserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
657
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
0
typical 8
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Nat Parnell Principal Huish Episcopi Academy Wincanton Road Huish Episcopi Langport Somerset TA10 9SS

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Huish Episcopi Academy

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 25 and 26 April 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require special measures following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in November 2022.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Huish Episcopi Academy

The inspection team discussed with you, senior leaders and governors the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We also spoke with pupils and staff, observed the school’s work, held meetings with other staff and reviewed documents. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

category of concern to be removed. I strongly recommend that the school does

not seek to appoint early career teachers.

p.1

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Safeguarding was judged to be ineffective at the previous inspection. Therefore, the focus of this first monitoring visit was to consider the effectiveness of safeguarding. Since the previous inspection, an interim principal has been appointed, as has a new chair of governors. Additional leadership capacity has been put in place on an interim basis. There is a new special educational needs coordinator. Leaders have prioritised pupils’ safety since the previous inspection. They have set high expectations for pupils’ conduct around the school site. Clear ‘lines in the sand’ mean that pupils know types of behaviour that are unacceptable. For example, pupils know that aggressive behaviour is not tolerated. Leaders have established effective routines for movement around the site. Pupils appreciate the high levels of adult supervision. This fosters positive relationships with staff and helps pupils to feel safe. Staff feel supported

p.1

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

with managing pupils’ behaviour. They recognise the impact of the improvements that leaders have made. As a result, the school site is typically calm and orderly.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders have established a ‘telling school’ culture. They encourage pupils to report concerns to staff. Leaders ensure that staff report their concerns about pupils’ welfare so that action is taken. Pupils feel that adults listen to them and are confident that they will resolve problems. For example, pupils know that there are serious consequences for bullying. Where concerns are of a safeguarding nature, staff follow clear procedures for reporting these to leaders. Leaders, in turn, take effective action to protect children. This includes work with external agencies and appropriate referrals to safeguarding partners.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders have continued to ensure that there are suitable arrangements for the safe recruitment of staff. They have created a culture of vigilance and ensure that action is taken to safeguard pupils. As a result of improvements made by leaders, safeguarding is now effective.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Pupils are beginning to understand the importance of respectful relationships. Leaders have implemented a ‘no hands on’ policy, which is understood by pupils. Pupils say that discriminatory language still occurs, but it is no longer widespread. This echoes the observations of inspectors. Leaders have considered how to strengthen pupils’ personal development, such as how they learn about equality and diversity. However, this work is in its infancy. More work is required to develop and embed a coherent curriculum that prepares pupils well for life in modern Britain.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Governors have begun to hold leaders to account for their actions and priorities. However, their evaluation of the impact of the actions taken by school leaders is in its infancy. For example, they have ensured that leaders start to improve the identification of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and communication with their parents. However, it is too soon to fully evaluate the impact of these actions.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Somerset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion