Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Greenacre School
Summary
Michelle Lower (lead), James Stuart, Laura James, Martin Smith
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
22 Mar 2023
- Inspectors verified
James Stuart, Laura James, Martin Smith, Michelle Lower
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
ME5 0LP
- Name on report verified
Greenacre Academy
- URN verified
138046
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is because they lack the capacity within their own leadership to address the weaknesses in the school. p.2
- Those responsible for governance have been too slow in establishing clear lines of accountability to tackle weakness in the school. p.4
- The needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are not met well enough in class. p.2
- Often, when help is provided, it is ineffective in removing the barriers preventing pupils from coming to school. p.3
- Leaders provide effective training to ensure that all staff know how to identify the signs that pupils may be at risk of harm. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The multi-academy trust, trustees and the local governing body must work together to ensure that they embed their new systems of accountability to strategically monitor and improve school effectiveness. p.4
- Leaders must ensure that they take swift action to address this and re-engage pupils back into education. p.4
- This means they do not gain the knowledge they need to achieve highly. p.3
- Those students who need to retake English and mathematics achieve well. p.3
- Leaders must ensure that all staff have the training and confidence they need to implement the behaviour policy consistently. p.4
- Teachers therefore are not able to provide the effective support each pupil needs to learn. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes9
“Expectations of what pupils will achieve are too low.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,363
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Greenacre Academy 157 Walderslade Road, Walderslade, Chatham, Kent ME5 0LP
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 21 and 22 March 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils feel safe in school and report that bullying is not common. However, the use of derogatory language is normalised among pupils because not all staff address its use effectively. Pupils do not commonly report when they hear disrespectful language, so leaders are unable to tackle the issue effectively. Staff also do not consistently ensure that pupils know and follow the school rules. Lessons are commonly disrupted by calling out or defiant behaviour because staff do not maintain high expectations. Consequently, many pupils find it difficult to learn well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Expectations of what pupils will achieve are too low. When starting in Year 7, some pupils learn the ‘Alternative Curriculum’. Here, pupils do not learn sufficiently ambitious knowledge and skills. They are not as well prepared for the future. The needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are not met well enough in class. Consequently, these pupils are not making as much progress as they could.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils receive helpful careers advice. They learn about many different industries and pathways they could take after school. There is a wide range of different clubs and activities on offer, which further develop pupils’ interests and talents. However, leaders do not check that those who would benefit the most participate in these opportunities.
p.2
better?
There have been a number of recent changes in the school’s senior leadership team. This has been unsettling for the school community. The new senior leaders have not yet had the opportunity to develop their expertise to fully embed the much-needed improvements in behaviour, attendance and academic progress. The headteacher has a clear vision for the school. However, this is not realised because trust and school leaders have not put in place or monitored the necessary improvement processes to address the areas of concern.
p.2
better?
Trustees and governors also do not provide the effective challenge and support needed to make the required significant improvements. The multi-academy trust is reliant upon significant external help to support the school at this time. This is because they lack the capacity within their own leadership to address the weaknesses in the school. While school staff speak highly of the efforts of the new senior leaders, there is a recognition of the many challenges the school still faces. This has led to staff not having the confidence to challenge pupils’ negative attitudes towards learning and each other.
p.2
better?
In most subjects, leaders have identified the important knowledge that pupils need in order to go on to learn more. This knowledge is ordered in a logical way to help pupils make connections between new and prior learning. Learning builds year on year and teachers check what pupils can remember. However, assessment and 21 and 22 March 2023
p.2
3
subsequent feedback are not used consistently well in all subjects to help pupils understand how to improve. This hinders pupils’ progress in many subjects.
p.3
3
The curriculum is not equally ambitious for all pupils. Those pupils who struggle to read well or have barriers to learning study the ‘Alternative Curriculum’. Pupils study the same topics as their peers but not in sufficient depth. This means they do not gain the knowledge they need to achieve highly. Additionally, expectations of pupils in these classes are lower. Pupils with SEND are often placed in these classes alongside pupils who struggle to manage their behaviour. Teachers therefore are not able to provide the effective support each pupil needs to learn. This is having a significant impact on the progress of pupils in these classes.
p.3
3
Leaders are quick to identify the needs of pupils with SEND. They share detailed support plans with all staff. However, leaders do not check that teachers use these plans to adapt learning carefully. Leaders also do not commonly review plans to check if the support is helpful. Leaders know that a number of pupils are not fluent readers. Therefore, they ensure that the curriculum provides regular opportunities to practise reading. Pupils who need phonics support receive effective help.
p.3
3
Too many pupils, including students in the sixth form, do not attend school regularly enough. Leaders have not put in place effective processes to check which pupils need additional support to attend school. Often, when help is provided, it is ineffective in removing the barriers preventing pupils from coming to school. Consequently, these pupils miss out on learning the curriculum and on the experiences offered through the personal development programme.
p.3
3
Students in the sixth form speak highly of the range of vocational qualifications on offer. The offer is focused on apprenticeships and the world of work. However, a significant number of pupils study courses with less ambitious outcomes. While this is suitable for some students, it may limit the future options of others. Those students who need to retake English and mathematics achieve well.
p.3
3
The programme to promote pupils’ personal development is well developed from Year 7 to Year 13. The careers programme helps pupils to consider different routes to employment and education post-16. The ‘Skills for Life’ curriculum teaches pupils about leadership and respect. While leaders promote tolerance and respect in assemblies and tutor time, teachers do not insist that pupils fully engage in learning. Therefore, not all pupils fully comprehend the implications of disrespectful behaviour.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders provide effective training to ensure that all staff know how to identify the signs that pupils may be at risk of harm. They take swift action to provide support in school or seek additional help from external professionals if needed. Leaders are working tenaciously with other professionals in the community, such as the police, to ensure that the more vulnerable pupils are kept safe and are well supported. 21 and 22 March 2023
p.3
4
Records to show what steps leaders take to check pupils are safe when not in school are not maintained clearly enough. This makes it difficult for leaders to have oversight of the support for pupils who are not in school. Leaders are working to address this.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Those responsible for governance have been too slow in establishing clear lines of accountability to tackle weakness in the school. Consequently, leaders’ work to improve pupils’ attendance, progress and behaviour has not been effective and has not resulted in signs of improvement. The multi-academy trust, trustees and the local governing body must work together to ensure that they embed their new systems of accountability to strategically monitor and improve school effectiveness. Leaders do not ensure that all staff manage poor behaviour effectively or consistently address pupils’ use of derogatory language. Consequently, learning is disrupted. In addition, disrespectful behaviour has become normalised by pupils and they do not regularly report it. Leaders must ensure that all staff have the training and confidence they need to implement the behaviour policy consistently. The curriculum is not ambitious enough because expectations of some pupils,
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
including pupils with SEND, are too low. Not all pupils learn the knowledge and skills that they need to be successful. Leaders must take action to ensure that there is a suitably ambitious curriculum in place for every pupil. Leaders do not make sure that pupils attend school well enough, particularly students in the sixth form. Therefore, many pupils do not benefit from the education that the school provides and are falling behind in their education. Leaders must ensure that they take swift action to address this and re-engage pupils back into education.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school. 21 and 22 March 2023
p.4
5
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 21 and 22 March 2023
p.5
sixth form
Dates of previous inspection 9 and 10 May 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The school is part of the Skills for Life Academies Trust. The school uses three registered alternative providers to provide education and support for a small number of pupils. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 7 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical educational qualifications and apprenticeships. The school has a joint sixth form with Walderslade Girls’ School. This school is also part of the Skills for Life Academies Trust. 21 and 22 March 2023
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspection team carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, history and physical education. Inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, teachers and pupils, visited lessons and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also looked at planning in the modern foreign languages curriculum. Inspectors met with senior leaders, staff and pupils. The lead inspector spoke with trustees, including the chair of trustees, the interim chief executive officer and representatives from the local governing body, including the chair. Inspectors considered the 139 responses to the Ofsted Parent View questionnaire, including additional free-text comments. They also took account of the responses
p.7
Information about this inspection
to the confidential staff and pupil surveys and gathered the views of staff and pupils throughout the inspection. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors viewed the school’s website and policies, met with the designated safeguarding lead, spoke with pupils and staff, checked school records of safeguarding checks carried out on adults working at the school and spoke with trustees and the members of the governing board. Inspectors reviewed records of behaviour, including records of suspensions and the use of reduced school timetables. Inspectors reviewed attendance records, including a discussion of leaders’ actions when pupils do not attend school well.
p.7
Inspection team
Michelle Lower, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Laura James His Majesty’s Inspector 21 and 22 March 2023
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk.
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion