Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Julie Carrington
- Postcode verified
GL20 8RP
- Name on report verified
Carrant Brook Junior School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 24 March 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. p.1
- The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections. p.1
- During the inspection, I discussed with you and other leaders, staff, governors and the local authority the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. p.1
- We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. p.1
- I also visited lessons, reviewed pupils’ work, talked to pupils in lessons and around school, and scrutinised curriculum documents and the school’s development and monitoring plans. p.1
- I have considered all this in coming to my judgement. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment6
“Teaching is addressing gaps in pupils’ phonic knowledge head-on.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 551
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Maria Budd Headteacher Carrant Brook Junior School Hardwick Bank Road Northway Tewkesbury Gloucestershire GL20 8RP
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Carrant Brook Junior School
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 24 March 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Carrant Brook Junior School
During the inspection, I discussed with you and other leaders, staff, governors and the local authority the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited lessons, reviewed pupils’ work, talked to pupils in lessons and around school, and scrutinised curriculum documents and the school’s development and monitoring plans. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
made progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the
The school should take further action to:
p.1
made progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the
ensure that the school’s approaches to implementing the curriculum, including designing tasks, enable all pupils to reach suitably ambitious curriculum goals in every subject, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.1
Main findings
Since the previous inspection, the school has reduced from seven to six classes. One governor has left and another governor has joined. There have been no changes to teaching staff.
p.2
Main findings
You and your staff are working steadily to bring about the necessary changes to the curriculum. There is a new systematic synthetic phonics programme in place. Teaching is addressing gaps in pupils’ phonic knowledge head-on. Pupils have lots of practice to build their reading fluency and to apply phonics to spell accurately. Leaders’ recent work to enhance staff’s knowledge of teaching pupils with SEND so that teaching builds firmly on what these pupils already know is well underway. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, staff are shaping the curriculum to improve the quality of pupils’ writing.
p.2
Main findings
Subject leaders’ work to identify the essential knowledge pupils need to learn in every subject is paying off. As a result, staff know what pupils need to learn and in what order. Increased training opportunities are helping staff to apply effective teaching approaches to specific subjects. Where subject curriculums are more established, for example in science and computing, pupils speak with knowledge and enthusiasm, and remember a wealth of subject content. However, in a few subject curriculums, the agreed curriculum goals are not sufficiently ambitious. Leaders are beginning to address this, but it is early days.
p.2
Main findings
Governors check leaders’ work against the intended actions on the school improvement plan. You use the advice and support you receive from the local authority productively. For example, subject leaders are now better equipped to check teachers’ delivery of the curriculum in their subjects. This is beginning to help you and governors evaluate the impact of the school-wide curriculum over time. However, some of this work is recent. As a result, some inconsistencies in the implementation and impact of the curriculum remain.
p.2
Main findings
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Gloucestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion