Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Juice Nurseries Limited
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Apr 2023
- URN verified
EY357973
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 352
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
On 4 April 2023, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 18 April 2023, we carried out an unannounced regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken some action to put this right. The provider had reflected on their risk assessments for the use on certain equipment to ensure the safety of children. They had also implemented further measures to minimise the risk of harm to children with allergies and/or dietary requirements. However, on the day of the visit it was found that some staff had not been fully updated on the updates to the risk assessments and the procedures put in place to support children with allergies and/or dietary requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
Furthermore, we found that the provider had failed to notify Ofsted of significant events, which is a requirement of their registration.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We have issued actions for the provider to take.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure when changes are made to risk assessments that all staff have a thorough understanding of procedures, so that the equipment and the environment is always safe and secure
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure all staff are clear on the procedures to follow at mealtimes particularly, in regard to children with allergies and/or dietary needs.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 3 May 2023, the provider responded to the actions set. We found that the provider has improved their risk assessments procedures to ensure equipment is always safe and secure. They have also ensured that staff are clear on the procedures to follow in regard to children with allergies and/or dietary needs. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion