Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Pinvin CofE Academy
Summary
Lorraine Lord (lead), Benjamin Taylor
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Feb 2023
- Inspectors verified
Benjamin Taylor, Lorraine Lord
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
WR10 2ER
- Name on report verified
Pinvin CofE First School
- URN verified
144260
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some parents and carers expressed concern about the behaviour of pupils and the poor response of leaders to concerns that they raise. p.2
- They do not train staff well enough to identify the signs that pupils may be at risk and, when staff do have concerns, they do not pass them on swiftly. p.3
- Pupils say that sometimes other pupils are unkind, and incidents of bullying are not always dealt with effectively by leaders. p.2
- That said, these pupils do not learn as well as they could, due to the shortcomings in curriculum design and delivery. p.2
- Safeguarding arrangements are not effective. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They should make sure that staff are trained to identify any pupils at risk swiftly. p.4
- Leaders have not identified the precise knowledge that pupils need to know and remember. p.2
- Teachers have not identified the precise knowledge that pupils need to know and remember. p.4
- Leaders should review their safeguarding practices as a matter of urgency. p.4
- Leaders should improve the sequencing of the curriculum, so that it identifies what pupils should know and builds on their knowledge over time. p.4
- Leaders should support subject leaders to check how well pupils achieve in their subject. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding5
“Safeguarding arrangements are not effective.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,199
- shorter than usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Pinvin CofE First School Main Street, Pinvin, Pershore, Worcestershire WR10 2ER
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 2 and 3 February 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils enjoy coming to school. Leaders do all they can to make sure that pupils attend school regularly. Recent improvements to the reading curriculum are having a positive impact. Trips and visits help pupils to broaden their horizons. A range of clubs allow pupils to develop their talents and interests, for example, in knitting, cooking and gymnastics.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders do not set high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Low-level disruption in some lessons affects how well pupils learn in school. Pupils say that sometimes other pupils are unkind, and incidents of bullying are not always dealt with effectively by leaders. At times, pupils feel that their voice is not heard, and problems are not resolved. School systems for recording and following up on incidents are not robust. Some parents and carers expressed concern about the behaviour of pupils and the poor response of leaders to concerns that they raise.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Safeguarding arrangements are not effective. This leaves pupils at risk of harm. Leaders do not check carefully enough on how well pupils learn the curriculum.
p.2
better?
Leaders have designed an ambitious curriculum for pupils. However, it is not clearly sequenced in some subjects. Leaders have not identified the precise knowledge that pupils need to know and remember. Teachers have not had enough subject-specific training to help them to deliver some areas of the curriculum well. Teachers’ and leaders’ checks on how well pupils learn the curriculum are not effective. They do not identify and address gaps in pupils’ learning and clarify misconceptions quickly enough. Opportunities to recap on prior learning are inconsistent. As a result, pupils do not know and remember the intended curriculum well enough.
p.2
better?
Leaders prioritise reading. They make sure that pupils read and are read to regularly in school. Staff are well trained to teach phonics. They support pupils to practise and apply their phonic knowledge. This includes when pupils read books which match the sounds that they are learning. Pupils who struggle with reading are well supported to catch up. This means that, over time, pupils become fluent readers.
p.2
better?
Leaders ensure that the pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are identified and get the support they need to be successful. Teachers adapt the delivery of the curriculum to meet their needs. That said, these pupils do not learn as well as they could, due to the shortcomings in curriculum design and delivery.
p.2
better?
The new nursery provision for two- and three-year-olds is a warm and caring environment. Staff build effective relationships with children. They prioritise children’s independence and communication skills. As a result, children settle well into the daily routine and know what is expected of them. Children with additional needs are well supported. For example, pupils with speech and language needs 2 and 3 February 2023
p.2
3
receive effective support. However, staff do not consistently plan activities that enable children to learn the intended curriculum. Leaders have not ensured that the early years curriculum is clearly mapped out from the start of Nursery through to the end of Reception Year. As a result, children do not learn as well as they could.
p.3
3
Most pupils behave well in lessons and around the school site. However, some struggle to do so. Where this happens in lessons, staff do not always address this. As a result, lessons are disrupted too often. This holds pupils back from learning.
p.3
3
Leaders prioritise the personal development of pupils. For example, pupils appreciate and care for nature and the environment. Opportunities such as litter picking, and being a sports captain allow pupils to take on responsibilities in school. They learn about democracy through the work of the pupil parliament. Pupils learn about different cultures and religions, including Christianity, Hinduism and Islam. They have a sound understanding of these. In music lessons, pupils learn about the lifestyle of the Maasai tribe and the Japanese festival Hanuni. This helps pupils to develop their understanding of tolerance and respect of others. As a result of this work, pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain.
p.3
3
Leaders including, trust leaders, have not done enough to tackle weaknesses in the school. Measures put in place to secure improvement have not had the desired impact to improve the school. Parents and staff express concern about the turnover of staff and leaders. This turbulence in staffing and leadership has hampered the school’s progress.
p.3
3
Staff are positive about recent support from leaders to manage their workload and well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders do not meet their statutory safeguarding responsibilities. They do not train staff well enough to identify the signs that pupils may be at risk and, when staff do have concerns, they do not pass them on swiftly. Leaders do not act on concerns raised about pupils quickly enough. This leaves pupils at risk from harm. Leaders also do not maintain adequate records of their decision-making and the actions that they have taken to keep pupils safe.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders do not share important information with external agencies in a timely manner. This means that pupils do not get the help they need quickly enough. 2 and 3 February 2023
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
There are too many gaps in safeguarding practices in the school. This leaves pupils at risk from harm. Leaders should review their safeguarding practices as a matter of urgency. They should make sure that staff are trained to identify any pupils at risk swiftly. Leaders should also improve record-keeping and make sure that they share information, so that they are compliant with all statutory requirements to keep pupils safe. Teachers do not have high enough expectations of pupils’ behaviour. As a result, pupils’ learning is disrupted too frequently. Bullying and other poor behaviour between pupils can go unchecked by staff. Leaders should make sure that there is a clear and consistent approach to managing pupils’ behaviour. Leaders do not check how well pupils are learning the curriculum. Gaps in learning and misconceptions are not identified and addressed quickly enough. Opportunities to recap on prior learning are inconsistent. As a result, pupils do
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
not know and remember the intended curriculum. Leaders should support subject leaders to check how well pupils achieve in their subject. The curriculum is not coherently sequenced in some subjects, including in the early years. Teachers have not identified the precise knowledge that pupils need to know and remember. Pupils do not achieve as well as they could. Leaders should improve the sequencing of the curriculum, so that it identifies what pupils should know and builds on their knowledge over time.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 2 and 3 February 2023
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10256846 Type of school First
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 3 March 2020, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
Nursery provision for two- and three-year-olds opened in September 2022. There are currently 15 pupils on roll in this provision. Leaders make use of one registered alternative provider.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, physical education and science. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the 2 and 3 February 2023
p.5
6
curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work Inspectors observed pupils reading to a familiar adult. They reviewed reading resources. Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation on the school’s website. Inspectors scrutinised the school’s safeguarding arrangements. This included examining the record of employment checks on school staff. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and at other times during the day. Inspectors held meetings with the acting headteacher, acting deputy headteacher (who also acted in the absence of the special needs coordinator), the designated safeguarding leader, the early years leader, representatives of the Diocese of Worcester Multi-Academy Trust Company, a representative from the diocese and a representative from the local authority. Inspectors took account of responses to Ofsted Parent View, and the pupil and
p.6
Inspection team
Lorraine Lord, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Benjamin Taylor Ofsted Inspector 2 and 3 February 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion