Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Norton Hill Academy

Inspected 22 Mar 2023 · published 19 May 2023 · URN 136335

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Matthew Collins (lead), Helen Kerr, Tim Redding

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Mar 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Helen Kerr, Matthew Collins, Tim Redding

  • Postcode verified

    BA3 4AD

  • Name on report verified

    Norton Hill Academy

  • URN verified

    136335

Page 2 of 6
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivestrongimprovedoutstandingproudhigh expectationsconfidenteffective
Criticismconcernsseriousnot alwayslowernot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings914w+56
  • Safeguarding103w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,013
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 60, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Norton Hill Academy Charlton Road, Midsomer Norton, Radstock, Somerset BA3 4AD

p.1

Outcome

Norton Hill Academy continues to be a good school. There is enough evidence of improved performance to suggest that the school could be judged outstanding if we were to carry out a graded (section 5) inspection now. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders are ambitious for what pupils can achieve. Pupils, therefore, receive a high- quality education. Pupils are proud to attend Norton Hill Academy. They feel safe and happy at school. Pupils say they enjoy learning and the large range of trips, clubs and activities available to them. These include outdoor education, music, drama, dance and sports. Leaders encourage all pupils to take part. As a result, many pupils benefit from these opportunities.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff have high expectations of pupils’ conduct. Pupils behave well at school because they understand that it is the right thing to do. Pupils are tolerant and respectful towards each other and to members of staff. Bullying is rare. Pupils say they know who to talk to if they have any concerns. They are confident these will be dealt with quickly.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The sixth from offers a wide range of courses and opportunities. These include trips, music and drama. Younger pupils want to progress into the sixth form because they know they will achieve well. Many students take up places in higher education or progress on to apprenticeships.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils follow a well-designed curriculum and benefit from a rich set of experiences. Subject leaders are experts in their field, and they have carefully planned what to teach and when. They have considered the knowledge and skills that pupils will need to develop in each subject. They also provide staff with the subject-specific training they need to deliver the curriculum well. 21 and 22 March 2023

p.1

2

Teachers use their expertise to check whether pupils have understood the new ideas introduced in the curriculum. Teaching is responsive and helps pupils to overcome any misconceptions. Pupils, therefore, confidently explain what they have learned over time.

p.2

2

This is an inclusive school. Leaders identify the help that pupils need when they join the school. This includes those who need support with reading. Pupils who are furthest behind receive support from trained staff. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are well supported. Leaders provide teachers with clear information about each pupil. Teachers use this to make sure that pupils with SEND achieve highly. Students with SEND in the sixth form achieve well.

p.2

2

There are clear expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Pupils’ attitudes towards their learning are positive, and they conduct themselves well around the school site. They join in and contribute to discussions. Pupils talk about their learning enthusiastically.

p.2

2

Students in the sixth form act as positive role models. Younger pupils say they aspire to be like them. The sixth-form council organises voluntary activities and events for the wider school community.

p.2

2

Leaders have put a strong curriculum in place to support pupils’ personal development. This covers important themes, which prepares pupils well for life in modern Britain. Pupils learn how to make decisions about their own lives. They also learn to be tolerant and understanding of others. Pupils receive regular advice and guidance about potential future career paths. This prepares them well to take the next steps in their lives.

p.2

2

Trustees and senior leaders have a clear vision. They provide support and challenge for leaders and other staff. Staff are proud to work at the school. They think leaders listen to them and treat them well. Parents are largely positive about the school. However, a small number say communication between school and home could be improved further.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders have established a strong culture of safeguarding. Staff understand its importance. They know how and when to report concerns about pupils or adults. Staff receive effective training.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders make timely referrals to safeguarding partners. They engage other agencies to support pupils. Leaders are not afraid to challenge others to secure the support that children need. They complete appropriate checks before adults start working in the school.

p.2

Safeguarding

Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe, including when online. They say that they are confident to talk to staff if they have any concerns. 21 and 22 March 2023

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 A minority of parents feel that staff do not always communicate clearly with them about the school’s support for their child. This can sometimes weaken the relationship between school and home. Leaders should ensure that parents receive regular and timely communication to allow them to support the school effectively.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually, this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in January 2013.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 21 and 22 March 2023

p.3

School details

Local authority Bath and North East Somerset Council

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10250469 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive

p.4

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,851

p.4

form

Date of previous inspection 28 July 2017

p.4

Information about this school

 The school uses one registered alternative provider.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, senior leaders, the chief executive officer, a trustee, and a member of the local governing body.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, modern foreign languages and science. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum 21 and 22 March 2023

p.4

5

with subject leaders, visited a selection of lessons, met teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with the designated safeguarding lead, examined school safeguarding records and discussed safeguarding cases.  Inspectors talked with a leader from the alternative provision that the school uses.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and responses to the staff survey.

p.5

Inspection team

Matthew Collins, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

Tim Redding Ofsted Inspector 21 and 22 March 2023

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion