Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Ladysmith Infant & Nursery School
Summary
Donna Briggs (lead), James Gentile, Jo Hicks
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
22 Feb 2023
- Inspectors verified
Donna Briggs, James Gentile, Jo Hicks
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
EX1 2PS
- Name on report verified
Ladysmith Infant & Nursery School
- URN verified
113080
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school was last inspected 15 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. p.1
- This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time. p.1
- From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. p.1
- Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection. 21 and 22 February 2023 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance16
“Leaders need to ensure that staff have sufficiently high expectations of all pupils.” p.3Parents & families3
“Parents and carers agree that the school is a welcoming place.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,154
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Ladysmith Infant & Nursery School Ladysmith Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 2PS
p.1
Inspection dates: 21 and 22 February 2023
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The school was last inspected 15 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection. 21 and 22 February 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are happy to attend Ladysmith Infant and Nursery School. They know it is important to follow their school rules. In the corridors, pupils use their ‘walking feet’ to move sensibly and politely around the school. In lessons and the playground, most pupils behave well. Yet, for a small number of pupils, disruption to learning and poor focus are more common.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils do not fully understand what bullying is. However, when this is explained to them, they are confident that bullying happens rarely. They all agree that adults sort out any worries or concerns well. Pupils benefit from the care and nurture they receive from staff. Parents and carers agree that the school is a welcoming place. This helps pupils to feel safe and most pupils attend regularly and on time.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are keen to learn. However, they do not benefit from a good quality of education in some subjects. Pupils enjoy opportunities to enrich their learning. For example, older pupils visit a local church and mosque. Pupils visit the school’s wooded area to learn forest skills. They are beginning to benefit from a range of extra-curricular clubs, including football and gymnastics.
p.2
better?
Leaders have a clear vision for the school and have plans in place to make the necessary improvements. However, in many subjects, this work is in its infancy. Therefore, it is too early to see the impact of leaders’ actions. Subject leaders do not yet have sufficient oversight of the subjects they lead. In these subjects, pupils do not learn an ambitious enough curriculum.
p.2
better?
Leaders do not identify the important knowledge that pupils need to understand and remember. In some subjects, staff do not have the knowledge and expertise they need to teach the curriculum well. Staff do not check carefully what pupils know so that pupils’ learning builds over time. Where the curriculum is more cohesive, pupils learn better. For example, in art and design pupils talk about the work of Beatriz Milhazes and Julian Opie with confidence.
p.2
better?
Leaders prioritise reading. Pupils get the help that they need to become fluent readers. Pupils in the early stages of learning to read follow a well-sequenced, coherent curriculum. Pupils remember the phonics sounds that they learn. They use these to read carefully selected books. Children in the Nursery and Reception Years enjoy listening and joining in with stories and rhymes. Pupils love to read. One older pupil commented, ‘Reading takes me to another world.’ Many pupils agree.
p.2
better?
Staff do not have high enough expectations for all pupils. Sometimes, pupils do not take pride in the quality of their work. This leads to pupils making careless mistakes, which impedes their future learning. 21 and 22 February 2023 Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and pupils with English as an additional language benefit from well-planned support for their social and emotional needs. For some pupils, there is precise support to help them learn the curriculum. For others, this is not effective.
p.2
better?
Children in the Nursery Year become independent and confident. For example, they ably change from indoor to outdoor shoes or select resources they need to join in with activities. They cooperate well with their peers and with adults. However, the teaching of the curriculum in the early years is sometimes not effective. Children are not supported to use what they know independently or extend their learning into areas beyond their own preferences.
p.3
better?
The curriculum for personal development is new. Staff are beginning to use this curriculum to address gaps in pupils’ knowledge, particularly for religious beliefs and how other people live. Pupils respect each other’s differences. They know that ‘being a good friend means not being unkind’. Pupils learn about being physically and mentally healthy. They take their responsibilities as school councillors and playleaders seriously.
p.3
better?
Staff are positive about the support they receive. Staff are confident that leaders consider their well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders ensure that all staff and governors receive regular safeguarding training. There are clear systems for reporting any concerns. Staff are vigilant in using the school’s systems to inform leaders of worries. Leaders regularly engage with external agencies to get the right help for pupils and their families. Leaders corrected some minor administrative errors in the single central record during the inspection.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe. When using online technology, they know not to share any personal information. ‘Kelso the frog’ supports pupils to make choices to keep themselves safe.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Many subject leaders do not have sufficient oversight of the subjects that they lead. They have not considered carefully enough the important knowledge that pupils need to know and remember, including in the early years. Leaders, including those responsible for governance, should ensure that subject leaders have the expertise to evaluate the quality of education in all subjects. 21 and 22 February 2023 Staff do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve or how they behave. Therefore, pupils do not always display positive attitudes towards their learning. Low-level disruption goes unaddressed. Leaders need to ensure that staff have sufficiently high expectations of all pupils. In some subjects, staff do not have the knowledge and expertise they need to teach the curriculum well. As a result, some pupils learn better than others. Leaders should ensure that staff have the support they need to implement the
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
curriculum successfully. The needs of some pupils, including pupils with SEND and those with English as an additional language, are not considered well enough. Sometimes, the support provided and the targets set for pupils are not precise enough. Leaders need to ensure that all pupils receive support that is well matched to their needs.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 21 and 22 February 2023
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Co-chairs of governing body Annie Fletcher and Tom Butcher
p.5
Dates of previous inspection
29 and 30 April 2008, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is a larger-than-average infant school. The school has above-average numbers of pupils with English as an additional language. The school has a breakfast club for some pupils. The school has a nursery provision for children aged three and above. The school does not use any alternative providers.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the executive headteacher, the head of school, two assistant headteachers, the special educational needs coordinator and the early years leader. The lead inspector met with representatives from the governing body and the local authority. 21 and 22 February 2023 Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, religious education and computing. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspectors also considered the curriculum in some other subjects. The lead inspector spoke with the designated safeguarding leader and the deputy
p.5
Information about this inspection
designated safeguarding leader to discuss the school’s procedures for keeping pupils safe. She considered the school’s recruitment procedures, staff induction and training, records of concern and engagement with external agencies. The inspectors spoke with staff and pupils throughout the inspection. Inspectors considered responses to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses. Parents also spoke to an inspector in the school playground. Inspectors considered responses to the staff and pupil surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
Donna Briggs, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Jo Hicks Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
James Gentile His Majesty’s Inspector 21 and 22 February 2023 and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion