Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Gedney Hill Church of England VC Primary School

Inspected 22 Feb 2023 · URN 120548

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Peter Stonier (lead), Paul Halcro

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Feb 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Paul Halcro, Peter Stonier

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    PE12 0NL

  • Name on report verified

    The Gedney Hill Church of England VC Primary School

  • URN verified

    120548

Page 3 of 7
Page 3 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+18Mostly positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivevery wellwarmconsistentlyextremelystronghigh-qualityhigh quality
Criticismnot alwaysmissedat riskpoorfalling behindconcernsinconsistentgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1138w+12
  • Safeguarding86w+67
  • What needs to improve32w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,220
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 56
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of The Gedney Hill Church of England VC Primary School North Road, Gedney Hill, Spalding, Lincolnshire PE12 0NL

p.1

Inspection dates: 21 and 22 February 2023

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 21 and 22 February 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils say they are safe at this happy and inclusive school. Staff know pupils and their families very well. There is a ‘family feel’ here. This creates a warm culture across the school. Most pupils behave very well. Bullying is extremely rare. Pupils can talk with many different adults should they wish to share a worry or problem.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders and staff have improved key areas of the school since the previous inspection. However, they know that there is still work to do. Mathematics is not always taught as well as it could be. It is not always clear how well pupils are progressing through the foundation subjects. Staff do not have high-enough expectations. They do not always insist that pupils produce work of a high enough quality.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There are many opportunities for pupils to develop their talents and interests. They benefit from various after-school clubs, trips out and visitors to the school. Pupils enjoy many different responsibilities. These include being house captains, junior road safety officers, play buddies, librarians and members of the school council.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff reinforce the school values of, for example, peace, forgiveness, friendship, hope and perseverance through frequent collective worship. Pupils understand these values, and try to use them in their daily lives.

p.2

better?

Leaders have planned precisely what they want pupils to learn in nearly all subjects. The knowledge, skills and key vocabulary are being carefully selected. Leaders have nearly completed this piece of work.

p.2

better?

Leaders have not ensured that the teaching of mathematics is consistently strong. Sometimes, teachers do not make links between what pupils have previously been taught and their new knowledge. There are missed opportunities for pupils to develop their mathematical thinking and understanding. Some pupils do not have an appropriate understanding, and knowledge, of the times tables. Consequently, in mathematics, pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are not progressing as well as they might.

p.2

better?

Teachers routinely check what pupils have remembered in English, mathematics and science. This helps to spot the gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding. However, leaders have yet to formalise how teachers will check what pupils know in the foundation subjects. Consequently, it is unclear how well pupils are progressing in these subjects.

p.2

better?

The teaching of phonics and early reading is a strength. Leaders have introduced a phonics scheme, which starts in the early years. Staff have received effective training. Pupils have reading books at the appropriate level of challenge. The books match the sounds that the pupils are learning. Pupils use their phonic skills to 21 and 22 February 2023

p.2

3

decode any unfamiliar words. Pupils who are at risk of falling behind are spotted promptly. They receive extra support to help them to catch up.

p.3

3

Most pupils behave well. This includes children in the early years. They follow sensible routines and conduct themselves well at lunchtimes and breaktimes. Some parents and carers raised concerns about pupils’ behaviour. However, leaders are taking appropriate action where necessary. They receive specialist help from the outreach support service and provide pupils with appropriate behaviour plans. This work is effective. The number of incidents of poor behaviour has fallen dramatically during the academic year. Pupils’ current rates of attendance and punctuality are both good.

p.3

3

Pupils learn about faiths and cultures that are different to their own. They understand that there are different types of families. Pupils understand the British values of democracy, respect and tolerance. They are learning to be thoughtful and respectful citizens. They have an age-appropriate understanding of relationships and health education. Pupils are being prepared well for life in modern Britain.

p.3

3

There are effective systems in place to identify pupils with SEND. Leaders ensure that pupils have appropriate targets. These are checked and reviewed frequently. Pupils with SEND benefit from extra resources and adult support. These help them to access the full curriculum. Staff have received effective training in, for example, autism and dyscalculia.

p.3

3

Leaders have ensured that there is a well-thought-through curriculum for children in the early years. Activities are carefully planned and have a clear purpose. Staff are skilled in asking children well-considered questions. This helps to develop children’s thinking and improve their vocabulary. Relationships between adults and children are warm and positive.

p.3

3

Staff are proud to work at the school. Most staff appreciate the training opportunities that are provided. Many say that leaders are appreciative of their well- being and workload.

p.3

3

The governing body members fulfil their statutory duties. They ask appropriate questions during meetings. However, they are too reliant on the headteacher for information. They do not routinely find out for themselves what is happening. Consequently, they do not fully hold leaders to account for their actions.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders and staff have received effective safeguarding training. They are vigilant to the potential signs of abuse or neglect. Safeguarding records and subsequent actions are appropriate. Outside agencies are used effectively. Pupils and families who require extra support receive it promptly. 21 and 22 February 2023

p.3

4

Pupils are taught how to stay safe when crossing roads, using the internet and riding bicycles. Older pupils learn about the potential dangers of social media and the sharing of images on mobile phones.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The implementation of the mathematics curriculum is inconsistent. Teachers do not always make links to pupils’ prior learning. There are missed opportunities to develop pupils’ mathematical thinking. Some pupils do not have a secure enough understanding of the times tables. Consequently, not all pupils are progressing as well as they could. Leaders should ensure that staff have the necessary knowledge and skills to implement the mathematics curriculum as it is intended.  In the foundation subjects, teachers do not check well enough what pupils have learned and remembered. Therefore, they do not always know how well pupils are progressing in these subjects. Leaders should ensure that teachers routinely check what pupils have remembered, to help them assess how well pupils are progressing. These checks should not be overly time-consuming.  Leaders and teachers do not have high-enough expectations and do not insist

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

that pupils produce high-quality work. Too many workbooks contain careless and untidy work. Leaders should ensure that pupils have pride in their work and that it is consistently of a high quality.  The governing body members are too reliant on the headteacher for information about the school and how well it is performing. They do not find out for themselves what is happening. The governing body should introduce a comprehensive programme that enables it to gather information at first hand and therefore hold leaders fully to account for their actions.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 21 and 22 February 2023

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Headteacher Alison Buddle (Executive Headteacher)

p.5

School details

Website https://www.gedneyhillschool.co.uk/

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 21 and 22 May 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is a Church of England primary school. It underwent a section 48 Statutory Inspection of Anglican and Methodist Schools (SIAMS) in September 2015. SIAMS inspections were suspended as part of COVID-19 restrictions.  The head of school took up the role in September 2022.  Since the previous inspection, there are new teachers in all three classes.  The school does not use the services of any alternative providers.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held various meetings with the executive headteacher, the head of school and other staff. The lead inspector met with two members of the 21 and 22 February 2023

p.5

6

governing body, including the vice-chair, and held a telephone conversation with a representative from the local authority.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, art and history. Inspectors met with subject leaders to discuss curriculum planning, visited lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors looked at curriculum plans and spoke with leaders about some other subjects. The lead inspector listened to pupils from Year 1 and Year 2 read.  Inspectors met with pupils to understand their views of the school.  To inspect safeguarding, the lead inspector checked the single central record. Inspectors checked staff’s knowledge of the school’s safeguarding procedures. Safeguarding records were scrutinised.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s parent and staff questionnaires.

p.6

Inspection team

Peter Stonier, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Paul Halcro His Majesty’s Inspector 21 and 22 February 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion