Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Highbury House

Inspected 30 Mar 2023 · published 18 May 2023 · URN 2677035

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Twenty Four-Seven High Support Accommodation for Young People Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Mar 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Lydia Isaac

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Highbury House

  • URN verified

    2677035

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 23% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellenteffectivepositivetrusting relationshipsclearengagingskilledeffectively
Criticismconcernsconcernat risknot alwayslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1006w+30
  • What needs to improve248w−40

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,252
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 43
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential family centre: Highbury House 1 Highbury House Twenty Four-Seven High Support Accommodation for Young People Limited Address withheld Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

This residential family centre is privately owned and operated. The centre provides accommodation for up to eight families who are subject to parenting assessments.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

A new manager is in post, who is in the process of applying to Ofsted for registration.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and parents, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and parents are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The residential family centre provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable

p.1

good

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for residential family centre: Highbury House 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

At the time of the inspection, there were three families living at the centre. The centre has been decorated to a high standard, with the communal areas providing a comfortable and homely environment. The families are encouraged to bring their own belongings, which helps to create a more personalised feel.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families living at the centre have developed positive and trusting relationships with the staff and manager. During the inspection, the inspector observed parents engaging well with staff. One parent said the support from staff had helped them to become a better parent.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families with additional needs receive additional support. Staff are skilled in adapting their communication to meet the learning needs of parents effectively. For example, pictorial aids and different coloured paper are used for parents who have learning needs. As a result, parents can communicate their understanding of their children’s needs. This demonstrate staff’s commitment to ensuring that the assessment process is accessible, to meet the needs of the families they provide a service to.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Assessment reports are completed by a qualified social worker. The reports are well written and provide a clear and skilful analysis of the families’ progress. The reports are evaluative and provide clear outcomes and recommendations. They also include detail of the future support that families will need once they return to the community.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families engage in the assessment process and receive weekly feedback. They are actively encouraged to share and document their views during the weekly meetings. During the inspection, parents told the inspector that the weekly feedback helps them to understand the progress of their assessment.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Staff support the parents to meet their and their children’s health needs. All families are registered with the local doctor’s practice. The manager has made links with the local health visiting team and the families can access support and guidance from a named health visitor who visits the centre on a fortnightly basis. This gives families opportunities to seek parenting advice from familiar professionals.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Overall, parents feel welcomed when they arrive at the centre and are supported to adapt to their surroundings. However, they are not always provided with the residents’ guide before they arrive at the centre. This does not provide the families with the opportunity to ask questions or share concerns they may have. Inspection report for residential family centre: Highbury House 3

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Families receive safe and effective care. The manager and staff understand their safeguarding roles and responsibilities. Safeguarding procedures are implemented to ensure that children are protected should incidents of significant concern occur.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Staff provide high levels of supervision until parents show evidence of progress. There is a gradual reduction in the supervision levels when children are at less risk. Any reductions are made in agreement with the local authority social worker. Staff have a clear understanding of the different levels of supervision. The inspector observed the staff working with the families in accordance with their supervision levels.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

The centre uses CCTV to monitor families where and when necessary. Agreements for monitoring parents and their children are needs-led and based on risk levels. When they arrive at the centre, families are helped to understand the use of CCTV and its purpose. For example, one parent was able to explain to the inspector why CCTV monitoring was in place.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Since the centre’s registration, there have been no complaints. Families are aware of how to make a complaint but have not done so, preferring to speak to the manager directly if they have any concerns.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Good recruitment practices are in place. This ensures that only those people who are safe to do so work at the centre.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Matching documents provide sufficient information about the family’s history, including strengths and concerns. The manager currently uses several different documents to record information about whether a family should move in.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

When there are concerns around staff practice, these are managed well and appropriate action is taken. However, Ofsted was not notified about an incident of concern. This does not allow for external monitoring by the regulator.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The registered manager post is vacant. A new manager has been appointed and is in the process of submitting her application to Ofsted. The new manager has a social work qualification and was previously the centre’s principal social worker. She already has a good understanding of the functioning of the centre.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The manager is passionate about her role and is focused on ensuring that the families have the right support, while keeping children central to the assessment process.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Since the centre was registered, there has been a high turnover of staff. This has not affected the quality of the assessments being completed. Action is being taken Inspection report for residential family centre: Highbury House 4 to address staff vacancies. However, at present, the centre cannot run at full capacity due to staff shortages.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff feedback is positive. They enjoy coming to work and report that the team is supportive and encouraging. They feel supported and valued by leaders and managers.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

External professionals said that communication was excellent. One social worker said the assessment of support required was helpful in creating an appropriate support plan for her family once their assessment had ended.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

An independent person has been appointed to carry out monthly visits to the centre. The independent visitor completes and submits detailed reports to Ofsted in a timely way. This provides an analytical overview of the service. This helps the regulator as well as the manager in monitoring the service. Inspection report for residential family centre: Highbury House 5

p.4

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.5

Requirement Due date

If, in relation to a residential family centre, any of the events listed in column 1 of the table in Schedule 5 takes place, the registered person shall without delay notify the persons indicated in respect of the event in column 2 of the table.

p.5

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall without delay notify the parent accommodated in the residential family centre with a child of any significant incident affecting the child’s welfare unless to do so is not reasonably practicable or would place the child’s welfare at risk. (Regulation 26 (1) (2))

p.5

Requirement Due date

This specifically relates to the registered manager notifying Ofsted of significant events. 15 May 2023

p.5

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that the centre has and implements a procedure for introducing families to the centre so that their move is managed with sensitivity and care. This includes arrangements for introductions to parents and children already living in the centre. (Residential Family Centres: NMS 7.1)  The registered person should ensure that they prepare a residents’ guide which includes a summary of the statement of purpose, and provide a copy for every parent and child (of appropriate age) resident in the centre and for prospective residents. (Residential Family Centres: NMS 8.6) Inspection report for residential family centre: Highbury House 6

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and parents using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: Highbury House 7

p.6

Residential family centre details

Registered provider: Twenty Four-Seven High Support Accommodation for Young People Limited

p.7

Residential family centre details

Registered provider address: 28 High Road, London N2 9PJ

p.7

Inspector

Lydia Isaac, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: Highbury House 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspector

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion