Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 May 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Aykin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Aykin

  • Postcode verified

    PL19 8DD

  • Name on report verified

    Tavistock College This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−9Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongambitiousfeel safewell preparedconfidentlyeffectivelyimprovedsafe
Criticismconcernsseriousweaknessesat riskharmnot yetsuspensions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
738
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 8
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Tristan Muller-Forster Principal Tavistock College Crowndale Road Tavistock Devon PL19 8DD

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Tavistock College

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 17 March 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in May 2022.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Tavistock College

During the inspection, I discussed with you, other senior leaders and the CEO of the multi-academy trust the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with groups of pupils. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

designation

This was the first monitoring visit since the school’s section 5 inspection in May 2022. Since the inspection, a vice-principal overseeing behaviour and inclusion, a director of special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), an assistant principal for teaching and learning and an assistant principal for disadvantaged pupils, science, technology and mathematics have been appointed. The focus of the monitoring inspection was to evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements in place at the school and leaders’ management of behaviour.

p.1

designation

The changes that leaders have introduced to the school’s safeguarding arrangements ensure that most pupils feel safe at school. For example, leaders have changed the lunchtime arrangements, which has reduced the number of pupils accessing the outdoor space at one time. As a result, there is significantly less unruly behaviour, and most pupils feel protected. There is a calm and orderly environment around the school at lunchtime. Leaders meet regularly to scrutinise the impact of support on pupils identified as being at risk of harm.

p.2

designation

Leaders have revised the personal, social and health education curriculum to support pupils to be well prepared for the world beyond school. Leaders have also ensured that teachers have strong and up-to-date knowledge about this programme. Consequently, pupils articulate their knowledge confidently about a breadth of topics, such as the importance of tolerance and understanding of other cultures and faiths. Leaders have particularly placed a focus on misogyny and gender-based violence. Pupils state that the curriculum is helping to build a culture where pupils with protected characteristics are safe and supported. However, this is not yet fully embedded.

p.2

designation

Pupils state that bullying is an issue for some but that, when it is reported, it is dealt with effectively. Leaders have oversight of bullying incidents and address issues as they arise. Overwhelmingly, pupils state that there are trusted adults in the school with whom they can share their concerns. However, some pupils still do not report issues about bullying, fearing that it may worsen the situation. Leaders are establishing ways for pupils to report their concerns anonymously, but many pupils cannot access these during school hours. Student leaders have raised this issue and are working with senior leaders to resolve it.

p.2

designation

Leaders have revised their approaches to managing pupils’ behaviour and conduct. They track pupils’ behaviour closely and provide bespoke support for pupils who need it. All staff and pupils have received training to ensure consistent expectations regarding acceptable behaviour, both in and beyond the classroom. Pupils state that behaviour is getting better around the school, but some issues remain. Pupils, in all year groups, state that behaviour in lessons has improved due to the actions leaders have taken to improve the quality of the curriculum and to teaching. The increased profile of pupils with SEND when considering curriculum planning has also supported improvements to behaviour in lessons. However, disadvantaged boys with SEND are still disproportionately represented in suspensions and internal isolation.

p.2

designation

Leaders are ambitious for the academic, social and emotional well-being of pupils. Their school improvement planning makes clear how the areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection report are to be addressed. Leaders have commissioned external validation to evaluate the impact of their improvement strategies. I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Dartmoor multi-academy trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Devon. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion