Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Woodland Community Primary School

Inspected 14 Mar 2023 · published 9 May 2023 · URN 134599

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janette Walker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Mar 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Janette Walker

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 6QH

  • Name on report verified

    Woodlands Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    134599

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+15Mostly positivemore positive than 14% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyambitiousstrongpositivesecurehigh expectationseffectivehappy
Criticismconcernsstruggleweaknessesat riskseriouslacknot sufficientlynot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1374w+22
  • Safeguarding106w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,477
longer than usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Woodlands Community Primary School Heathgate, Birch Green, Skelmersdale, Lancashire WN8 6QH

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. Inspectors are recommending the next inspection to be a graded inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Woodlands Community Primary is a happy place to be. Pupils and their parents and carers value the ‘family feeling’ at the school. Staff build positive relationships with pupils and know them well. Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or difficulties (SEND), know that the staff care about them and will support them if they have any worries. Leaders resolve any bullying issues thoroughly. This helps pupils to feel safe and secure.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils understand leaders’ high expectations of their behaviour and they make every effort to reach them. Pupils get on well together. They treat the staff and each other with respect. Pupils who have recently joined the school said that they were warmly welcomed and made friends easily.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils take advantage of the wide and varied range of exciting extra-curricular activities on offer. Pupils value opportunities to take part in sporting events and competitions, including athletics and swimming. They take great pride in their sporting success. They enjoy the regular trips and residential visits they go on to enrich their learning.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have positive attitudes to learning and are encouraged to try their best. However, some pupils, but particularly those who struggle to learn, are not taught to read well. This prevents them from achieving as well as they should.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have designed a broad, ambitious and interesting curriculum for all pupils, including those with SEND. They have carefully considered the local area and the experiences of pupils to make the content of the curriculum relevant. 13 and 14 March 2023

p.1

2

From the early years, leaders have decided on the important knowledge that they want pupils to learn. They have ordered the content of curriculums thoughtfully to ensure that the new ideas that are introduced build on what pupils have previously learned. This allows pupils to make connections in their learning and to deepen their understanding over time.

p.2

2

Most subject leaders are trained well and provide valuable guidance for teachers about how to deliver curriculums effectively. However, teachers sometimes do not use assessment strategies consistently well in lessons to check that pupils’ understanding is secure. This hinders them from adjusting their teaching approaches, such as directing the support provided by other adults, to meet pupils’ learning needs effectively. As a result, some pupils, including those with SEND, do not achieve as well as they could.

p.2

2

Leaders ensure that pupils with SEND are identified early. Teachers deploy a range of approaches to ensure that this group of pupils experiences the same curriculum as their classmates. However, the progress made by this group of pupils is hindered by the weaknesses in the delivery of the curriculum, including the early reading curriculum.

p.2

2

In the early years, staff help children in the Nursery class to listen carefully. This ensures that most children are ready to learn sounds and letters as soon as they start in the Reception class. However, leaders have not maintained a strong enough oversight of the success of the agreed phonics programme. The approaches taken by teachers to deliver the curriculum vary in quality.

p.2

2

Some pupils who find reading difficult, including those with SEND, do not receive effective support to help them to catch up quickly. Some of the books that pupils are given to practise their reading are too difficult. This can make reading laborious for pupils, affecting their enjoyment of reading as well as their confidence. Consequently, too many pupils are unable to read fluently and confidently by the end of key stage 1. In turn, this means that many pupils are unable to access the well-considered reading curriculum that leaders have designed for pupils in key stage 2.

p.2

2

Pupils are polite, well mannered and articulate. Pupils behave in a calm and sensible way during lessons, play times and around the school. Pupils are able to listen to their teachers and focus on their learning as lessons are rarely disrupted. Leaders’ determined efforts to improve pupils’ attendance have been rewarded.

p.2

2

Pupils embrace the rich diet of opportunities that leaders provide for learning beyond the classroom. Pupils experience regular and varied trips both locally and further afield. Pupils take part in themed weeks each year that celebrate significant people and cultural events. These experiences help pupils to broaden their horizons. Pupils understand and demonstrate that everyone should be treated with respect regardless of their differences. The develop a strong understanding of the importance of staying physically and mentally healthy.

p.2

2

Members of the newly reconstituted governing body are ambitious for the school. However, they lack sufficient awareness of some aspects of the school curriculum. 13 and 14 March 2023

p.2

3

Staff are proud to work at the school. They value the approachability of leaders. Staff said that leaders give careful consideration to their workload and well-being.

p.3

3

Parents hold the school in high regard. Many parents value the support and care that their children receive. They also appreciate the efforts made by leaders to involve them in their children’s education.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have created a strong culture of safeguarding in the school. They ensure that staff receive regular training so that they remain vigilant to the signs that indicate that pupils might be at risk from harm. Staff follow clear guidance to report concerns which are followed up tenaciously by leaders. When necessary, leaders do not shy away from escalating their concerns to secure appropriate help for vulnerable pupils and their families.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils learn about how to keep themselves safe. For example, they learn about road safety, staying safe online and some of the features of healthy relationships, such as consent.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have not kept a rigorous check on how well the early reading curriculum is delivered. This includes the effectiveness of the support provided to pupils who struggle with reading. This has resulted in many pupils not learning to read fluently or accurately soon enough which hinders their achievement. Leaders should ensure that staff are suitably trained to deliver the early reading curriculum effectively. In addition, leaders should ensure that pupils who struggle with reading receive effective support from suitably trained staff so they can catch up quickly.  Some teachers do not use assessment information routinely to check pupils’ understanding. They do not adapt their approaches effectively to meet the needs of all pupils, including those with SEND. As a result, some pupils do not receive the support or adjustments they need to secure their understanding. Leaders should ensure that teachers are trained sufficiently well to adjust their teaching approaches in lessons in

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

response to assessment information. This will enable pupils to access the curriculum with confidence and achieve well.  Members of the governing body are not sufficiently informed about some aspects of the curriculum. This means that they are unable to challenge leaders effectively. Governors should ensure that they have the information that they need to hold leaders to account for the effectiveness of the delivery of the curriculum and pupils’ achievement within it. 13 and 14 March 2023

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually, this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.4

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in November 2016.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 13 and 14 March 2023

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10211022 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 17 and 18 November 2016

p.5

Information about this school

 The school runs a breakfast club.  The school does not currently make use of alternative provision for any pupil.  There was an acting headteacher in post at the time of inspection.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school has received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspector held discussions with the headteacher and other leaders. She also spoke with subject leaders and other members of staff.  The inspector spoke with four members of the governing body, including the chair of governors. The lead inspector also spoke with a representative of the local authority.  The inspector observed pupils’ behaviour in classrooms and corridors, at breakfast club and at lunchtime. She spoke with different groups of pupils to discuss their views of the 13 and 14 March 2023

p.5

6

school, their learning, their behaviour and safety.  The inspector checked the arrangements for keeping children safe. She reviewed documentation, including information about attendance and bullying, and spoke to leaders, governors, staff and pupils.  The inspector carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, she discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and reviewed samples of pupils’ work. The inspector observed pupils reading to a familiar adult.  The inspector met with leaders responsible for the provision for pupils with SEND and scrutinised samples of documentation relating to SEND, including pupils’ support plans.  The inspector considered parents’ views, which were shared through Ofsted Parent View. This included the free-text comments received from parents. The inspector also

p.6

6

reviewed the responses to Ofsted’s survey for staff and for pupils.  The inspector considered a range of documents shared by school leaders, including the school development plan, external reports and audits, the minutes taken at governing body meetings and leaders’ self-evaluation documents.

p.6

Inspection team

Janette Walker, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector 13 and 14 March 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion