Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)
Information about this residential family centre
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 Mar 2023
- Inspectors verified
Catherine Sikakana
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Name on report verified
Information about this residential family centre
- URN verified
2648817
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The conduct of staff has been exemplary. p.3
- Professional practice, including the quality of direct-work sessions, parenting assessments and reports, is of an exceptionally high standard and well written. p.2
- This has helped many parents to understand the changes they need to make for their children to thrive, be safe and remain in their care. p.3
- The assessing social worker is confident in their final recommendation based on sound evidence, objectivity and effective analysis. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 1,130
- shorter than usual (typical 1609)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 1%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for residential family centre: The Sisu Nest 1 Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this residential family centre
This is a privately owned and run residential family centre. The primary purpose of the centre is to support local authorities, courts, parents and children by providing fair and evidence-based parenting assessments. The centre is registered to accommodate up to five families. At the time of the inspection, there were three families in residence.
p.1
Information about this residential family centre
The families have their own bedrooms and share the communal rooms. The communal space includes a large dining kitchen, a play/sensory room, a spacious lounge and two bathrooms with a bath and shower. There is a medium-sized garden and a large parking area that encloses the property.
p.1
Information about this residential family centre
The residential family centre registered on 20 October 2021. The registered manager has resigned. However, a new manager is in post and has submitted her application to register.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and parents, taking into account good
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
How well children and parents are helped and protected good
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
The residential family centre provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
Date of previous inspection: Not previously inspected
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
Enforcement action since last inspection: not applicable Inspection report for residential family centre: The Sisu Nest 2
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good
Parents and their children experience a warm welcome when they first arrive. Often, parents are visited beforehand, and some parents are able to visit the centre to have a look round. This emphasis on admission planning goes a long way in dispelling misconceptions, helping parents to feel less apprehensive. All parents spoken to said it was a different and more positive experience than what they expected.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good
The environment is well maintained and decorated to a good standard. Each family has their own bedroom that they can personalise to their taste. Communal areas are spacious and well equipped with essential equipment, toys, books and sensory play items. Parents are given the basics, such as toiletries, towels, bedding and food, which helps them to settle quickly and feel at ease in their new environment.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good
Parenting assessments are tailored and delivered by an experienced assessing social worker. The coordinated approach and regular dialogue with family assessment practitioners ensure that assessments remain focused on the specific needs of the parents and their children. Throughout the assessment process, parents’ views are considered and taken into account. This ensures that parents feel fully engaged in their assessment.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good
Professional practice, including the quality of direct-work sessions, parenting assessments and reports, is of an exceptionally high standard and well written. Final reports are evaluative and reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the parents and their journey of change throughout the assessment process. The assessing social worker is confident in their final recommendation based on sound evidence, objectivity and effective analysis.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good
Feedback from parents, past and present, and from professionals is overwhelmingly positive. The quality of assessments, children’s safety and the support parents receive is consistently complimentary. Comments include:
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good
‘It was an absolute pleasure to have so many people truly dedicated to their job helping me and my daughter out all the way through.’ ‘You have given me the skills and knowledge to last a lifetime.’ ‘They are a hands-on provision that works restoratively to not only assess parents with their children but also support them.’ ‘Children’s safety is at the heart of what they do.’
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good
Extracurricular activities and recreational opportunities in the wider community are facilitated and encouraged. This has seen parents engage in soft play, music, baby massage and yoga. The centre engages and encourages parents in sensory play, craft activities and sewing sessions. Parents benefit from this increased social interaction. Inspection report for residential family centre: The Sisu Nest 3
p.2
How well children and parents are helped and protected: good
Impact risk assessments are completed at the referral stage, and this considers a number of risk factors such as the environment, location and compatibility with other residents. This informs decision-making, placement planning and assessment, and it ensures that the protection of children and parents is embedded into practice from the onset.
p.3
How well children and parents are helped and protected: good
Staff are clear on the risks and needs of the children and their parents. The management of risk is well documented and implemented with the safety and well- being of children at the forefront. Parents understand the expectations for their behaviour, and this helps them to begin to make the necessary changes to enable them to safely look after their children.
p.3
How well children and parents are helped and protected: good
The use of close monitoring and surveillance is clarified at the beginning of the placement, and parents are informed of the use of CCTV. There is an agreement in place that specifies the level of supervision required. This is reviewed regularly to ensure proportionality is balanced against children’s safety and parents’ right to privacy.
p.3
How well children and parents are helped and protected: good
Since the centre opened, 23 families have been assessed. Not all have had positive outcomes, yet from the feedback seen, parents have appreciated the unconditional care, support and guidance from all the staff. Parents have felt listened to and consulted. This has helped many parents to understand the changes they need to make for their children to thrive, be safe and remain in their care.
p.3
How well children and parents are helped and protected: good
The conduct of staff has been exemplary. There have been no complaints or allegations about poor or unsafe practice. All staff understand their safeguarding responsibilities. Accidents involving children are swiftly responded to, and actions taken by staff ensure the children’s immediate safety. Managers are quick to investigate and determine any lessons learned.
p.3
How well children and parents are helped and protected: good
The employment of staff is thorough and in accordance with safe recruitment processes. This means that all individuals are safe and fit to work with children. The manager needs to be assured that there are effective parameters in place when relatives and/or partners work together to ensure professional boundaries are maintained.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Since the centre was first registered, there has been a change in the leadership team. The registered manager has since left, and the training and development manager has stepped into the role. The new manager is awaiting registration. This has provided continuity in service delivery and minimal disruption for staff and families. Inspection report for residential family centre: The Sisu Nest 4 Leaders and managers are committed to providing a safe and nurturing environment for families to feel at home. Parents are given time to settle in and establish a routine so that they can fully engage in the assessment process. The manager and responsible individual are highly motivated and continue to develop the service to ensure that parents and their children receive an individualised and bespoke assessment. The assessing social worker plays an integral role in the completion of evidence-based assessments both at the midway
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
point and at the final stage of the placement. This assists the local authority and the courts in making well-informed decisions.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
There is a well-established and diverse team of staff who have many skills, talents and experiences that they use in their day-to-day practice. Staff genuinely want the best for families, and parents value the positive relationships that develop during their stay. Support continues when families leave the centre, helping them to move on with their lives and sustain the positive changes they have made.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff receive regular and good-quality reflective supervision. In addition, staff benefit from focus sessions that provide group debriefs and thematic discussions on, for example, safeguarding and relationship-based practice. The manager’s commitment to staff development and training opportunities promotes better outcomes.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager is on a continuous journey of improvement. A range of monitoring tools, stakeholder feedback and consultation with parents and staff are used to evaluate the service. This helps to enhance practice and develop the service.
p.4
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and parents using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: The Sisu Nest 5
p.4
Residential family centre details
Responsible individual: Catherine Coulier
p.5
Inspector
Catherine Sikakana, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: The Sisu Nest 6 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Inspector
T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion