Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Axholme Academy

Inspected 9 Mar 2023 · published 5 May 2023 · URN 137759

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Mar 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Gordon Watts, Lynette Edwards, Matthew West, Thomas Wraith

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    DN17 4HU

  • Name on report verified

    The Axholme Academy

  • URN verified

    137759

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+18Mostly positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyhigh expectationshigh-qualityambitiouspoliterespectfulwell supported
Criticismnot consistentlyconcernstoo manypersistently absentgapsnot securedisruptionnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1084w+15
  • Safeguarding130w+32

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,186
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 55
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of The Axholme Academy Wharf Road, Crowle, North Lincolnshire DN17 4HU

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good 8 and 9 March 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have high expectations of pupils’ conduct. Recent changes to the behaviour policy have supported a more focused atmosphere for learning. Most, but not all, parents and carers feel that their concerns, including about behaviour, are listened to well. Pupils are polite and respectful. In lessons, they focus on their education. Disruption to lessons is rare. During social times, pupils manage their behaviour well. Leaders use suspensions as a last resort. Pupils are well supported when they return to school following a suspension. Bullying is infrequent. Most pupils are confident that adults resolve bullying well.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders are committed to providing pupils with a rich and diverse set of opportunities to develop their cultural capital. Many pupils have experienced a residential educational visit since the COVID-19 pandemic. Where finance is a barrier to participation, leaders support families through the pupil premium funding. All pupils complete enrichment activities on Friday afternoons. Pupils experience at least three high-quality enrichment activities per year, including yoga, debating and chess. Pupils have additional opportunities to participate in leadership roles, for example the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award and sports leadership.

p.2

better?

Subject leaders have designed curriculums that ensure pupils experience the full ambition of the national curriculum. Increasingly, these take account of what pupils know from key stage 2. Teachers explain new content clearly. They introduce new learning in a logical order. This supports pupils to build on what they already know. Teachers, especially in key stage 3, use end-of-topic assessments well to check what pupils know.

p.2

better?

Leaders have recently updated the curriculum. The curriculum is becoming more embedded. Teachers’ effective input is having a positive impact on pupils’ learning. Current published examination results are not as strong as leaders want. Most pupils do achieve well in GCSE qualifications. This enables them to progress on to appropriate education or training when they leave the school. Leaders provide effective support for pupils with complex circumstances to remain in education and secure suitable provision when they leave. Leaders’ actions are in the best interests of pupils but affect published data adversely.

p.2

better?

Leaders prioritise reading. Pupils read regularly in tutor time and in daily ‘drop everything and read’ sessions. Leaders choose texts that expose pupils to important cultural issues, such as diversity. Pupils in the early stages of learning to read are identified quickly. They receive additional help to catch up. This supports them to access the wider curriculum.

p.2

better?

There is an agreed structure to lessons at The Axholme Academy. Most teachers apply this structure consistently. Retrieval starters, modelling and independent 8 and 9 March 2023

p.2

3

practice are routine features of lessons. Where teachers have used these features effectively over time, pupils apply their understanding to new problems, reason effectively and are resilient to setbacks. Some pupils experience a more variable quality of education. In these lessons, teachers do not revisit the most important knowledge in a structured and frequent way. This means that some pupils do not secure the required knowledge in their long-term memory. This slows their learning.

p.3

3

A small minority of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) study a curriculum that is adjusted to meet their needs. These pupils receive additional support, for example with reading, to enable them to access the wider curriculum. Teachers understand the needs of these pupils well. Leaders are rightly revising this curriculum to support these pupils to catch up with their peers more rapidly.

p.3

3

Leaders are ambitious for pupils with SEND. They know their needs well. Leaders provide teachers with detailed information about the needs of pupils with SEND. These ‘pen portraits’ are regularly reviewed. Leaders train staff in how to use the portraits effectively to adapt their teaching. In a minority of lessons, teachers do not use these strategies consistently enough.

p.3

3

Most pupils attend school regularly. Leaders have established clear systems to support regular attendance. Despite recent improvement, too many pupils are persistently absent. Leaders have added additional staffing capacity to improve this further.

p.3

3

The personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum is taught through ‘complementary studies’ lessons. Leaders enhance the curriculum by using assemblies and tutor time to consider emerging safeguarding priorities. Pupils learn about healthy relationships and other important concepts, such as the protected characteristics. Teachers do not revisit important content regularly enough. Pupils’ knowledge of some concepts, such as fundamental British values and other faiths and beliefs, is underdeveloped.

p.3

3

Over time, those with responsibility for governance have not had sufficient oversight of the work of school leaders. Trustees did not challenge consistently on important issues, for example on the impact of pupil premium funding. The new chair of the trust board and her team are rapidly improving this aspect of their work. They benefit from effective support from the local authority. While trustees are aligned with the vision of the principal, they now provide much greater scrutiny of leaders’ work.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The designated safeguarding leads are well trained. Pastoral staff have detailed knowledge of the pupils in their care. 8 and 9 March 2023

p.3

4

Leaders provide regular update training for the wider staff team. Adults know how to report concerns about a pupil’s welfare. Adults take action in a timely way to keep pupils safe. Leaders keep detailed records of incidents and check that staff provide pupils with effective support.

p.4

4

Leaders have adapted the PSHE curriculum and assemblies to promote important safeguarding messages with pupils. For example, all pupils have received an assembly about harmful sexual behaviours and how to keep themselves safe. During complementary studies lessons, pupils learn about the risks associated with drugs and alcohol. Pupils learn how to maintain their mental health.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Too many pupils are persistently absent from school. These pupils miss important learning, which results in gaps in their knowledge. Leaders should develop their systems for securing regular attendance further.  The needs of pupils with SEND are not consistently well met. Consequently, some pupils with SEND do not develop a secure understanding of the curriculum and do not achieve well. Leaders should ensure that the information teachers receive about how to meet the needs of pupils with SEND is precise, and that teachers implement these strategies routinely.  Some important knowledge from the PSHE curriculum is not revisited regularly enough. This results in some pupils not having detailed knowledge, for example, of other faiths and beliefs or British values. Leaders should check on the knowledge pupils have retained and adjust future learning to fill the identified gaps.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 8 and 9 March 2023

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 5 July 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 7 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical educational qualifications and apprenticeships.  The school uses six alternative providers. Five of these are unregistered and one is Ofsted registered.  The chair of the trust board began in her current role in September 2022.  The school is a single academy trust.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 8 and 9 March 2023

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The lead inspector met with members of the trust board and the local authority school improvement partner.  During the inspection, inspectors met with the principal. They also met with other senior and middle leaders, including those responsible for safeguarding, personal development, careers, attendance and behaviour.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, science, mathematics and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Members of the inspection team looked at a range of documents regarding the support that pupils with SEND receive. Inspectors looked at the quality of the

p.6

6

provision for pupils with SEND in lessons.  Inspectors met with the designated lead for safeguarding. They checked records of actions taken by leaders to keep pupils safe. Inspectors scrutinised the single central record of recruitment checks.  Leaders from the alternative providers spoke to members of the inspection team.  A wide range of pupils and staff talked with inspectors, formally and informally, about the safeguarding culture in school over the course of the inspection.  Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents, including the school’s self-evaluation and improvement plans.  Inspectors looked at a range of information regarding behaviour. Inspectors observed the behaviour of pupils at social times.  The views of parents, pupils and staff who responded to Ofsted’s surveys were considered.

p.6

Inspection team

Thomas Wraith, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Matthew West Ofsted Inspector 8 and 9 March 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion