Schools & FE · Further education monitoring visit
University of Bradford
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Mar 2023
- Inspectorssingle source
Malcolm Fraser
- Postcode verified
BD7 1DP
- Name on report verified
University of Bradford
- URN verified
133791
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 28
- shorter than usual (typical 36)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 9 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 0
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
University of Bradford Report following a monitoring visit to a ‘requires improvement’ provider
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Malcolm Fraser, His Majesty’s Inspector
p.1
Type of provider: Higher education institution
p.1
Address:
Richmond Road Bradford BD7 1DP Monitoring visit: University of Bradford, 8 and 9 March 2023
p.1
Context and focus of visit
The University of Bradford was inspected in March 2022. At that time, inspectors judged the overall effectiveness of the provision to require improvement.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
The focus of this monitoring visit was to evaluate the progress that leaders and managers have made in resolving the main areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers have led an effective review of all apprenticeships. Through this, they have ensured that the curriculum of the higher apprenticeship programmes that they provide covers the requirements of the relevant apprenticeship standards. Leaders have overseen the work that curriculum staff have completed to map the learning outcomes of degrees to the apprenticeship standards. Through the improved formal oversight, review and curriculum approval processes for apprenticeships, leaders and managers can now assure themselves that higher degree programmes continue to align with the relevant apprenticeship standards.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Since the previous inspection, leaders and managers have provided useful support for staff to help them to develop their understanding of all aspects of apprenticeships. This has given staff the skills and confidence to plan effective apprenticeship programmes. For example, in the chartered manager standard, staff have planned a personal development module that runs throughout apprentices’ time on the programme. This enables apprentices to review and reflect regularly on their learning against the knowledge, skills and behaviours set out in the apprenticeship standard. Staff have adapted the work-based research project that laboratory scientist apprentices complete to ensure that it covers the key knowledge, skills and behaviours that apprentices need. They have also scheduled this later in apprentices’ programmes. As a result, the gap in time between completing the degree award and apprentices being entered for the end-point assessment is much shorter. This
p.2
Reasonable progress
ensures that apprentices are better prepared for the final assessment. Monitoring visit: University of Bradford, 8 and 9 March 2023 Leaders and managers ensure that staff carry out a thorough induction with all apprentices at the start of their programme. This ensures that apprentices understand the requirements of the apprenticeship, how these will be covered through the curriculum, and how the knowledge, skills and behaviours that they acquire will be assessed.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Leaders have implemented a range of actions that have resulted in much strengthened governance and oversight of apprenticeships. Leaders’ and managers’ actions are having a positive impact on improving many aspects of the apprenticeships provided. However, leaders recognise that more work is required, particularly in relation to ensuring that apprentices experience consistently good teaching.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers have clarified well the lines of accountability for the quality of education and monitoring of apprenticeships in faculties and at a whole-institution level. In the year since the previous inspection, leaders have ensured that procedures for the regular, formal monitoring of apprenticeships by the higher degree apprenticeship (HDA) compliance team and subcommittees overseeing the delivery and quality of apprenticeships are now effective in identifying areas for improvement. They are effective in implementing actions to address these.
p.3
Reasonable progress
To support their oversight of apprenticeships, managers have established a range of key performance indicators and quality measures that they use to monitor the quality of education and the progress that apprentices make. Through continually maturing governance and oversight arrangements, leaders and managers now quickly identify most areas that require improvement. They agree actions with the teams responsible for apprenticeships to make changes to the curriculum or to the arrangements for the delivery of apprenticeships.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Course leaders recognise and welcome the much-strengthened oversight and coordination of apprenticeships. Rather than working independently in individual subjects and faculties, course leaders now see themselves as an apprenticeship team. They welcome the clarity about what is expected of them through the monitoring and support they receive from the HDA compliance team. The compliance and quality subcommittee meetings provide an effective forum for professional discussion and sharing of good practice. Monitoring visit: University of Bradford, 8 and 9 March 2023
p.3
Reasonable progress
Leaders have conducted a review of the curriculum plans and the support processes in place for nurse associate apprentices. Subject leaders, supported by the university’s academic skills team, carried out a survey of apprentices to establish common areas with which apprentices struggled. They used the results to plan and provide specific support sessions for apprentices.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Leaders also carried out a broader curriculum review to identify changes required to the curriculum for subsequent cohorts of apprentices. For example, in biology, a subject apprentices found particularly challenging, tutors have redesigned aspects of the curriculum to scaffold learning more effectively. They have introduced more frequent formative assessments. They plan for regular revisiting of key concepts to help apprentices consolidate their knowledge. Leaders have also introduced an essay-writing workshop to support apprentices to improve their academic writing.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Apprentices who raised concerns at the previous inspection, which took place early in their programme, now feel that they receive much better guidance and support. They welcome the positive changes that staff have made to the structure of their programme and the way in which the curriculum is taught. Lecturers clarify well for apprentices the expected outcomes of each module, so that apprentices understand the content they will cover and how they will be assessed.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Apprentices have a good understanding of the support available to them and how to access this through, for example, the university’s academic skills and library teams. Apprentices welcome the direct input provided by the academic skills team staff, which has helped them to cope better with the academic challenges of the course. Course leaders expect lecturers to model good practice in academic writing and referencing in their teaching materials and resources, so that these expectations are reinforced for apprentices.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers have reinforced their expectation that all staff who teach on the apprenticeship programmes read and understand the university’s assessment and feedback expectations. New teachers at the university have to complete formal training about these requirements. Staff have been encouraged to access the wide Monitoring visit: University of Bradford, 8 and 9 March 2023 range of centrally produced resources available to them to develop their teaching skills further, including in assessment and providing effective feedback. Through this, experienced staff can check whether they are meeting the expectations of the university and ask for support if they feel this is necessary.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers have focused on improving the quality of assessment and the effectiveness of feedback at recent faculty training days. During these development days, staff participate in useful workshop sessions with colleagues to carry out exercises that help to ensure the consistency of marking and the provision of feedback that helps apprentices to understand how to improve their work.
p.5
Reasonable progress
As a result of the actions taken by leaders and managers, the effectiveness of the feedback that apprentices receive is improving, and the majority have a better understanding of what they need to do to improve their work and achieve higher marks. Monitoring visit: University of Bradford, 8 and 9 March 2023 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Reasonable progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Reasonable progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Reasonable progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Reasonable progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion