Summary
Richard Kueh (lead), Amanda Downing, Annabel Davies, Donna Briggs, Louise Walker, Rakesh Patel, Zoe Lightfoot
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Mar 2023
- Inspectors verified
Amanda Downing, Annabel Davies, Donna Briggs, Louise Walker, Rakesh Patel, Richard Kueh, Zoe Lightfoot
- Postcode verified
SE10 0ER
- Name on report verified
Teach First
- URN verified
2680062
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health2
“Leaders take the workload and well-being of ECTs very seriously.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 717
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Teach First 6 Mitre Passage London SE10 0ER
p.1
Overall effectiveness Outstanding
The quality of professional development and training Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Outstanding
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection N/A
p.1
provider?
ECTs receive expertly designed training that is calibrated exceptionally well to meet their needs. This is because the lead provider checks what ECTs know about elements of the ECF to make training bespoke. Mentors and leaders of training adjust activities to account for what ECTs know and can do already. Seamless communication between programme leaders, facilitators and mentors makes this work extremely well.
p.1
provider?
ECTs develop extensive knowledge of how to apply the ECF when teaching different subject matter in their schools. They benefit from plentiful opportunities to watch other teachers and practise thoroughly themselves. This is so that ECTs can adapt their teaching to support pupils from a diverse range of settings and backgrounds.
p.1
provider?
Reflective practice is central to the training, which ECTs build through ‘development cycles’. ECTs confidently connect general educational content with their specific contexts in the early years, primary, secondary and post-16 phases. The training successfully helps ECTs to deepen their expertise, including the nuts-and-bolts of managing pupils’ behaviour and working with parents and carers.
p.1
provider?
ECTs receive joined-up messages about how to manage workload. For example, when they learn about assessment, their mentors consider how to help ECTs assess in proportionate and effective ways. When individual ECTs need additional help, leaders put high-quality support in place promptly.
p.1
Information about this lead provider
◼ There are 11,090 ECTs undertaking the lead provider’s ECF programme. Of these, 5,468 are in their first year of the ECF programme and 5,622 are in their second year. ◼ Teach First works with 20 delivery partners, who deliver training to 9,891 ECTs. ◼ The delivery partners include 18 teaching school hubs and two multi-academy trusts. ◼ Teach First provides direct delivery to 1,199 ECTs.
p.2
Information about this inspection
◼ This inspection was carried out by seven of His Majesty’s Inspectors. The inspection was carried out through in-person meetings, online meetings, on-site visits to delivery partners and an online visit to a delivery partner. ◼ Inspectors met with the lead provider’s representatives, including the programme director for teacher development, the head of school partnerships, the head of curriculum design and other senior leaders. The lead inspector also met with members of the strategic board and with members of the delivery and operations teams. ◼ Inspectors visited 12 delivery partners. ◼ Inspectors carried out focused reviews in primary programmes and secondary programmes. For each focused review, inspectors met with delivery partner leaders and facilitators, discussed training with groups of ECTs and mentors, met with headteachers and induction tutors, watched online training, reviewed exemplified training materials, and scrutinised documentation. Inspectors
p.2
Information about this inspection
observed four sessions of live training. ◼ Inspectors carried out 13 focused reviews. Of these, inspectors carried out 12 focused reviews with delivery partners and one focused review that considered Teach First’s direct delivery. ◼ The inspection team considered 1525 responses to Ofsted’s online survey for ECTs, 1150 responses from mentors, 549 responses from school leaders and 127 responses from delivery partner leaders.
p.2
better?
At Teach First, those in the early stages of their teaching career benefit from meticulously thought-through training that comprehensively covers the knowledge and skills outlined in the ECF. The ECF content is incorporated within a curriculum that includes extensive illustrations of what this might look like in practice in different subjects and phases. Leaders place tackling disadvantage at the heart of the decisions they make about key aspects of training. Detailed sessions, led by well-informed facilitators, prepare ECTs to decide how best to bring the ECF alive in their own specific teaching contexts. For example, secondary ECTs apply what they are taught about reading and language comprehension in their design and technology lessons, to support pupils who are still at the early stages of learning to read.
p.2
better?
The lead provider uses formative assessment adeptly within the training. ECTs use information from low-stakes quizzes that they take before and after training modules to reflect on their growing professional knowledge base. This also helps their mentors gauge when ECTs might need greater support. For those ECTs who are confident with the basics, mentors equip them to explore educational research that further enhances ECTs’ teaching practice.
p.3
better?
What mentors learn on their training programme is well attuned to what ECTs cover. The training enables mentors to reflect on the ECF and their own professional experiences to craft discussions with ECTs. This gives ECTs additional guidance on how to put what they have learned to use in their developing teaching practice.
p.3
better?
ECTs develop an impressive knowledge of how to apply the ECF skilfully in different phases. For example, ECTs compare what it might mean to apply high behaviour expectations in an early years setting, with a post-16 classroom. ECTs who are less confident reflect on their improvements in seminars and get further practice opportunities with their mentors.
p.3
better?
The lead provider has forged highly productive relationships with each delivery partner. Together, they use their combined expertise to evaluate the delivery of the programme and make well-judged revisions where necessary. The lead provider uses its subject and phase specialist staff to develop training facilitators and to check the quality of individual sessions. Delivery partner leaders value the comprehensive support provided and the opportunity to feedback regularly. When there is a need, the lead provider is quick to assist in ways that are mindful of the size, location and demographic of delivery partners.
p.3
better?
Leaders and managers ensure that the programme follows relevant legislation. Leaders make ECTs aware of how to raise concerns about equalities and safeguarding issues. ECTs are confident that leaders and managers will act if they raise concerns, including if they require adjustments to access training.
p.3
better?
Leaders take the workload and well-being of ECTs very seriously. They take all reasonable steps to provide ECTs with extensive guidance and support. A majority of ECTs say that the training takes their well-being and workload into consideration.
p.3
Lead provider details
This inspection was carried out by His Majesty’s Inspectors (in accordance with the early career framework (ECF) and national professional qualification (NPQ) framework and handbook . The framework and handbook set out the statutory basis for ECF and NPQ inspections in England.
p.4
Lead provider details
Lead provider programmes offered ECF and NPQ
p.4
Inspection team
Richard Kueh, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Annabel Davies His Majesty’s Inspector Louise Walker His Majesty’s Inspector Zoe Lightfoot His Majesty’s Inspector Amanda Downing His Majesty’s Inspector Donna Briggs His Majesty’s Inspector Rakesh Patel His Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.4
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-
p.5
Inspection team
government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion