Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Holderness Academy
Summary
Thomas Wraith (lead), Chris Fletcher, Eleanor Belfield, Graham Findlay, Zoe Helman
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Mar 2023
- Inspectors verified
Chris Fletcher, Eleanor Belfield, Graham Findlay, Thomas Wraith, Zoe Helman
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
HU12 8UZ
- Name on report verified
Holderness Academy and Sixth Form College
- URN verified
145722
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance28
“Leaders recognise that these opportunities are not sufficiently well used.” p.2Safeguarding4
“Records of safeguarding concerns are thorough.” p.3Reading & phonics4
“Leaders prioritise reading.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,241
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Holderness Academy and Sixth Form College Station Road, Preston, Hull HU12 8UZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 2 and 3 March 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders’ high ambition for those who attend the school is not currently matched by what pupils experience. New leaders have brought about some necessary changes. They realise that there is more to do to provide the quality of education that they want all pupils to receive.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Bullying is rare. The vast majority of pupils are confident to raise their concerns with an adult. The actions of adults ensure that pupils are kept safe. In lessons, pupils focus on their learning. At social times, they are polite and respectful. Incidents of poor behaviour are infrequent. Staff address these appropriately.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Some pupils take on leadership roles, such as joining the school council. Others have been on an educational visit, for example to a theatre. A small number of pupils access work experience placements. Leaders recognise that these opportunities are not sufficiently well used. Leaders are extending the extra-curricular offer.
p.2
better?
The chief executive officer of the trust, since her arrival in September 2021, has developed the capacity of leaders through new appointments. The new headteacher, supported by trust and senior leaders, quickly assessed the school’s strengths and weaknesses. The headteacher understands there is much more to do to improve the school. Historically, leaders have not checked on the impact of the school’s improvement actions sufficiently well. As a result, the school has not improved as quickly as leaders, including trustees, want.
p.2
better?
Subject leaders have developed a curriculum that meets the requirements of the national curriculum. Teachers make sure that new learning builds on what pupils have already learned. In some subjects, the most important knowledge leaders want pupils to remember is not identified clearly. Teachers do not revisit this knowledge regularly enough. As a result, some pupils struggle to recall their prior learning. This slows their progress. Pupils, particularly disadvantaged pupils, do not achieve as well in external examinations as they should.
p.2
better?
Leaders recently reviewed the curriculum offer for students in the sixth form. Students can now choose from a wider range of courses, such as criminology or travel and tourism. Students access a range of additional courses, such as financial studies, during their non-qualification curriculum time. Leaders recognise these opportunities can be developed further. They have plans in place to enhance this area. Sixth-form students progress on to appropriate education, employment or training.
p.2
better?
A small number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive their education in the school’s additionally resourced provision. Leaders understand these pupils’ needs well. Staff who work with them are well trained. 2 and 3 March 2023
p.2
3
Staff effectively support these pupils to access lessons in the main school. Pupils with SEND who do not attend the additionally resourced provision, experience a more variable quality of education. Some parents and carers do not receive as much information about the support for pupils with SEND as they would like. Staff are provided with ‘pupil passports’. Teachers use the information in these passports to adapt their teaching. Some passports do not provide the important information that teachers need. Consequently, in some lessons, the needs of pupils with SEND are not met effectively.
p.3
3
Suspensions are rare and used as a last resort. Pupils are supported to improve their behaviour when they return to school. The vast majority of pupils attend school regularly and are punctual. A significant minority of parents are concerned about how complaints, including those about behaviour, are addressed by leaders.
p.3
3
Leaders prioritise reading. This is especially evident in key stage 3. Pupils in Years 7 and 8 are given two books per year to keep as part of leaders’ agenda to promote reading. Pupils in the early stages of learning to read are identified quickly. They receive additional support. This includes phonics lessons, where appropriate. A small number of pupils access paired reading sessions with university students. This supports them to read more fluently and confidently.
p.3
3
The aspirational vision leaders have for pupils’ personal development is not currently realised. During personal, social and health education lessons (PSHE), pupils learn about important concepts such as healthy relationships and how to look after their own mental health. The curriculum covers all of the required statutory content. Some pupils do not have a secure understanding of some of this content, for example, about other faiths or the protected characteristics.
p.3
3
Pupils in all year groups receive information about careers and their next steps in education, employment or training. Key stage 3 pupils are not as well supported as their older peers. Although pupils receive information about further education providers, it does not include all of the settings that pupils can progress to. Leaders do not inform pupils about the local university technical college.
p.3
3
Governors and trustees have an accurate understanding of the issues the school needs to address. They have provided additional resources to support these improvement priorities. Governors and trustees need to provide greater scrutiny of the work of leaders going forward. This includes more thorough checking on the impact of pupil premium funding.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders with responsibility for safeguarding know vulnerable pupils well. Records of safeguarding concerns are thorough. Pastoral leaders meet regularly to review open safeguarding cases. Leaders maintain oversight of cases with multi-agency 2 and 3 March 2023
p.3
4
involvement. They have developed effective relationships with external agencies, such as mental health and counselling services. They use these to keep pupils safe.
p.4
4
Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe in the community. During PSHE lessons, they learn about contextual risks such as those associated with drugs and alcohol. Students in the sixth form learn about these in a way that reflects their life outside school. Staff report concerns about a pupil’s welfare in a timely way.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The most important knowledge is not precisely identified within curriculum plans in some subjects, including PSHE. This knowledge is not prioritised and revisited regularly enough. Pupils struggle to retain it in their long-term memory. Leaders should ensure that curriculum plans specify the important knowledge that pupils should learn. Teachers are not provided with detailed information about how to meet the needs of pupils with SEND as a matter of course. Pupils with SEND, particularly those who do not access the additionally resourced provision, do not have their needs met consistently. Leaders should implement the planned changes to pupil passports. Leaders should check that the content of the passports is addressed effectively by teachers. Some members of the wider-school community do not feel their concerns are listened to well. They are not as supportive of the actions of the school as they
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
could be. Leaders should refine the school’s communication methods to ensure that more stakeholders support the pupils, the staff and the school as a whole.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 2 and 3 March 2023
p.4
School details
Local authority East Riding of Yorkshire
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10255560 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive School category Academy sponsor-led
p.5
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1138
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of the Consortium Academy Trust multi-academy trust. It became part of the trust in October 2018. The school does not meet the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 7 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical educational qualifications and apprenticeships. The school uses three Ofsted-registered alternative providers and one unregistered alternative provider. The school operates an additionally resourced provision for a small number of pupils with SEND. This mainly supports pupils with autism. The headteacher began in their post in January 2023. 2 and 3 March 2023
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The lead inspector met with members of the trust board, the local governing body, the chief executive officer and the director of standards (secondary). Inspectors met with the headteacher and other senior and middle leaders, including those responsible for the sixth form, safeguarding, alternative provision, personal development, careers, attendance and behaviour. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, science, mathematics, business and art. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Members of the inspection team looked at a range of documentation regarding the support pupils with SEND receive. Inspectors looked at the quality of the provision for pupils with SEND in lessons. Inspectors met with the designated lead for safeguarding. They checked records of actions taken by leaders to keep pupils safe. Inspectors scrutinised the single
p.6
Information about this inspection
central record of recruitment checks. Leaders at the alternative providers spoke to members of the inspection team. A wide range of pupils and staff talked with inspectors, formally and informally, about the safeguarding culture in school over the course of the inspection. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation, including the school’s self- evaluation and improvement plans. Inspectors looked at a range of information regarding behaviour. Inspectors observed the behaviour of pupils at social times. The views of parents, pupils and staff who responded to Ofsted’s surveys were considered.
p.6
Inspection team
Thomas Wraith, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Eleanor Belfield His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Zoe Helman His Majesty’s Inspector 2 and 3 March 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion