Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Steve Wren
- Postcode verified
S72 0EQ
- Name on report verified
Sandhill Primary School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- You have received highly effective support from the Every Child Matters Academy Trust, both through challenge and support from the CEO and also through opportunities provided for schools across the trust to work closely together. p.2
- The IEB has secure knowledge of the strengths and areas of ongoing development of the school. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 24 February 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. p.1
- The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections. p.1
- During the inspection, I discussed with you and your deputy headteacher, the chief executive officer (CEO) of the multi-academy trust and members of the interim executive board (IEB) the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. p.1
- We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. p.1
- I also visited lessons where pupils were being taught phonics and lessons where pupils were learning mathematics. p.1
- I held discussions with groups of pupils to discuss behaviour in school and their learning, reviewed curriculum documentation for geography and looked at pupils’ workbooks, including those for geography and history. p.1
- I met with a range of staff working in school, checked the school’s single central record and spoke to parents at the end of the school day. p.1
- I have considered all this in coming to my judgement. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language3
“For example, pupils were able to talk in depth, using appropriate subject-specific” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 903
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
James Haywood Headteacher (Acting) Sandhill Primary School Dearne Street Great Houghton Barnsley South Yorkshire S72 0EQ
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Sandhill Primary School
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 24 February 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Sandhill Primary School
During the inspection, I discussed with you and your deputy headteacher, the chief executive officer (CEO) of the multi-academy trust and members of the interim executive board (IEB) the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited lessons where pupils were being taught phonics and lessons where pupils were learning mathematics. I held discussions with groups of pupils to discuss behaviour in school and their learning, reviewed curriculum documentation for geography and looked at pupils’ workbooks, including those for geography and history. I met with a range of staff working in school, checked the school’s single central record and spoke to parents at the end of the school day. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
Main findings
You were appointed as acting headteacher in September 2022, having previously served as deputy headteacher. Another colleague in school was appointed as acting deputy headteacher at this time. The trust intends to appoint a substantive headteacher to take up post in September 2023.
p.2
Main findings
At the time of the last inspection, it was noted that leaders had focused on improving the teaching of reading, English and mathematics, and that this had been successful. However, while leaders had developed ambitious plans for other subjects, pupils were not achieving as well as they should in these subjects. Since the inspection in November 2021, you have continued to develop the curriculums in other subjects. You have ensured that your plans include precise detail of what pupils need to learn and when. This allows staff to focus their time on ‘how’, rather than ‘what’, to teach. Staff have received subject- specific training which enables them to make appropriate decisions as to the activities and resources to use with their classes. Combined, these approaches are supporting pupils to develop a depth of knowledge and understanding of the curriculum you have designed. For example, pupils were able to talk in depth, using appropriate subject-specific
p.2
Main findings
vocabulary, about the key features of rivers. They were able to talk about the key rivers in the UK, Europe and the world that were identified in your curriculum.
p.2
Main findings
Because of the way your timetable is organised, with some subjects taught in termly ‘blocks’, there are a very small number of subjects where the subject-specific staff development has not led to subject-specific teaching approaches being embedded. There are, however, clear and well-thought-through plans for staff development in these areas in advance of teaching in the summer term.
p.2
Main findings
You, and leaders at all levels in school, have focused attention on the things that will improve pupils’ education. You have ensured that the actions taken will improve things ‘in the long term’, rather than looking for ‘quick fixes’ that will not last. You have ensured that all staff are fully on board with the changes being made. As one member of staff commented, ‘I come into work every day knowing that I’ll have to work hard, but I know what I have to do, why it is important, and how it will make a difference to pupils. There is no ‘them and us’ with leaders, just ‘us’.’
p.2
Main findings
The IEB has secure knowledge of the strengths and areas of ongoing development of the school. The range of expertise of IEB members enables them to offer appropriate challenge and support to leaders. There are plans for the IEB to become a local governing body in September 2023.
p.2
Main findings
You have received highly effective support from the Every Child Matters Academy Trust, both through challenge and support from the CEO and also through opportunities provided for schools across the trust to work closely together. For example, opportunities on trust-wide staff training days for subject leaders from different schools to work together have allowed subject leaders to share their knowledge and experience of curriculum design. These close working relationships have supported swift, and high- quality, curriculum thinking and design.
p.2
Main findings
At the time of the last inspection, behaviour was improving but pupils were not always focused on their learning in lessons. You have had a clear focus on rewarding positive behaviour and pupils’ engagement in lessons. Pupils keenly collect ‘points’ for good behaviour and effort, which are then turned into star badges, which pupils wear with pride. Pupils’ efforts are further rewarded in assemblies through ‘star of the week’ awards. Pupils are now consistently showing high levels of engagement in their learning. Behaviour in lessons and around school is calm. Your work in this area has been effective.
p.3
Main findings
I am copying this letter to the chair of the IEB, the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Every Child Matters Academy Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Barnsley. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion