Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
St Andrew's Preschool Ashton
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Mar 2023
- Inspectors verified
Liz Dayton
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
PR2 1EQ
- Name on report verified
St Andrew's Preschool Ashton
- URN verified
2695895
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children's well-being and education are compromised due to the ineffective implementation of risk assessments at this setting. p.2
- They have failed to assess the risk associated with the ineffective heating p.3
- This means that the needs of children with EAL are not met effectively. p.3
- Leaders have failed to ensure that they manage the risks that they have identified. p.2
- This fails to ensure that children are not exposed to risks. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance16
“Leaders have failed to ensure that they manage the risks that they have identified.” p.2Staff development6
“Leaders have failed to implement regular supervision for staff.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,278
- longer than usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Andrew's Preschool Ashton Tulketh Road, Ashton-on-Ribble, Preston PR2 1EQ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not applicable
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children's well-being and education are compromised due to the ineffective implementation of risk assessments at this setting. Leaders have failed to ensure that they manage the risks that they have identified. When the heating system in the main room that children use started to not work efficiently, leaders did not take sufficient action. Children spend some parts of their day in the heated outdoor area. However, leaders have not adapted their provision to ensure that when children play for extended periods indoors, it is maintained at an appropriate temperature as recommended by health and safety legislation. This fails to ensure that children are not exposed to risks.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The individual needs of children are not known by staff. Leaders have not ensured that children have a key person, who understands their needs and how to effectively support them. Staff do not effectively use observations of children's learning to support them in finding out what children know and can do. This means that staff are not able to use their interactions with children to target their individual next steps in learning.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The curriculum does not build on what children know and can do over time. Although children enjoy a range of activities, staff are not clear what they want children to learn or how these experiences link to previous learning. Children are not making the progress they are capable of, particularly children who speak English as an additional language (EAL), and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Despite the weaknesses in this setting, staff interact positively with children. They provide children with a lot of praise and support them to understand the routines and expectations. When children hear the bell ring, they stop and listen carefully to the staff as they explain how children can help to tidy up. Children are keen to engage with the nurturing staff and enjoy the games they play with them. For example, they giggle as staff pretend to eat an invisible sandwich at lunchtime. Children enjoy the friendly interactions.
p.2
need to do better?
n Following registration, there have been a number of staff changes, including within the management team. This has hindered the ability of leaders to implement an effective key-person system. Children do not have an identified adult, who is able to ensure that their care and education is tailored to their needs. This does not support children to settle quickly and to build secure relationships when they start at the setting. Furthermore, this does not ensure that teaching is differentiated to meet children's needs.
p.2
need to do better?
14 March 2023 n Leaders do not ensure that effective arrangements are in place to support children with SEND. Targeted plans are not in place for children who have been identified as needing support in key aspects of their development. Staff do not know enough about the needs of these children to be able to effectively support them. Children with SEND do not get the help they need to make optimum progress from their starting points. n Leaders have failed to implement regular supervision for staff. They have not ensured that staff have been trained to implement an effective curriculum that meets every child's needs. Although staff have completed statutory training, such as safeguarding and paediatric first-aid courses, they have not received training that has focused precisely enough on teaching and the curriculum. This does not help staff to improve the quality of their practice over time. n Leaders fail to implement their intended curriculum, which focuses on children's
p.2
need to do better?
emotional development. They have not sequenced the curriculum to build children's knowledge and skills over time. Consequently, activities are not well- matched to children's levels of development and do not sustain children's attention. n Leaders have not implemented their intended strategies for supporting children with EAL, including the provision of visual aids to support children's understanding. They have failed to train staff to understand how to support these children, and have not considered ways for them to use their home language in the setting. This means that the needs of children with EAL are not met effectively. n Assessment arrangements are poor. Leaders do not ensure that staff use observations of children's learning to support them in understanding what children know and can do. Furthermore, leaders do not ensure that the required progress checks are carried out when children are between two and three years
p.3
need to do better?
of age. This does not ensure that any concerns about a child's development are identified early. It does not enable staff to be able to plan learning experiences that support children's development. This does not support good progress. n Leaders have not ensured that they use additional funding, such as early years pupil premium, effectively. They have not used this funding to support children in the aspects of their learning that will make the biggest difference to their progress. This does not ensure that children are well prepared for the next stage of their development. n Staff promote reading consistently throughout the setting. They enthusiastically read aloud to children and encourage them to explore books. Children gather round as they notice an adult reading. They focus intently on the book and talk about what has happened in the story. This aspect of the curriculum for literacy is having a positive impact on children's enjoyment of some learning.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have failed to safeguard children from identified risks to their health and welfare. They have failed to assess the risk associated with the ineffective heating
p.3
Safeguarding
14 March 2023 system. Leaders have failed to respond swiftly enough to address this issue, which means children and staff play and work in premises which leaders know are too cold to maintain their good health and well-being. However, other aspects of safeguarding are better managed. Leaders have robust recruitment systems in place to ensure that children are only cared for by staff who are suitable. Staff receive regular training on child protection. They understand the signs that may indicate children are at risk of abuse. They know what actions to take if they have concerns about children's welfare or about the conduct of a colleague.
p.3
Due date
ensure all staff are able to identify and respond swiftly to identified risks to children's safety and welfare, so that the premises remain suitable 28/03/2023
p.4
Due date
implement effective arrangements to support children with SEND, in line with the Special Educational Needs Code of Practice 28/03/2023
p.4
Due date
implement an effective key-person system, so that each child has a key person who understands their needs and how to support their next steps 28/03/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure that training and coaching provides staff with a deep understanding of the curriculum and how to improve the quality of their practice 28/03/2023
p.4
Due date
implement regular supervision sessions, which provide time for staff to discuss their key children, seek guidance on how to promote their individual needs and obtain coaching on their personal effectiveness 28/03/2023
p.4
Due date
14 March 2023 demonstrate how swift action will be taken to ensure that the premises can be maintained at a suitable temperature when used by children. 28/03/2023
p.4
Due date
devise and implement a well-sequenced curriculum that meets the individual needs of all children, so that they make the progress they are capable of 11/04/2023
p.5
Due date
ensure that children with EAL have opportunities to develop their home language as well as reaching a good standard in the English language 11/04/2023
p.5
Due date
ensure that staff use observations of children's learning effectively, to support them in planning for children's next steps 11/04/2023
p.5
Due date
ensure that the required progress check is carried out when children are between two and three years of age 11/04/2023
p.5
Due date
use additional funding effectively, such as early years pupil premium, to help all children make the progress they are capable of. 11/04/2023
p.5
Setting details
Unique reference number 2695895 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 10281455 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Sessional day care
p.6
inspection
Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 36 Name of registered person Buchanan, Charlotte
p.6
reference number
Telephone number 07731511458 Date of previous inspection Not applicable
p.6
Information about this early years setting
St Andrew's Preschool Ashton registered in 2022. There are currently five staff working directly with children, four of whom have appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 or above. This includes a qualified teacher, a higher level teaching assistant and a member of staff with a degree in education and professional studies. The setting is open from Monday to Friday, 8.30am to 4pm, term time only. The setting receives funding for the provision of free early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.6
Inspection activities
n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the setting. n This was the first routine inspection the setting received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and has taken that into account in their evaluation. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The manager joined the inspector on a learning walk and talked to the inspector about their curriculum and what they want their children to learn. n Children spoke to the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector spoke with the nominated individual about the leadership and management of the setting. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and
p.7
Inspection activities
outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector spoke to parents during the inspection and took account of their views.
p.7
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.7
Inspection activities
14 March 2023 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.8
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion