Summary
Alison Bradley (lead), Gary Holden, James Broadbridge
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
2 Mar 2023
- Inspectors verified
Alison Bradley, Gary Holden, James Broadbridge
- Postcode verified
MK18 7DS
- Name on report verified
Buckingham Partnership
- URN verified
70285
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders should build on their work to enrich the curriculum by clearly defining the subject pedagogy trainees need to acquire and be assessed against. ◼ Mentoring is not consistently as precise as it needs to be. p.3
- In some subjects, the focus on what trainees need to learn and the alignment between their centre- and school-based learning is not as specific as it could be. p.3
- Leaders should implement their plans to enhance mentoring by ensuring that all school-based staff are fully conversant with the underpinning research and structured process for developing trainees’ practice as set out in the CCF. p.3
- These subject champions have a clear rationale for the curriculum content, rooting it in what trainees need to learn to be well prepared to teach the subject. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 945
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Buckingham Partnership Unit A, Bourton Business Park, Buckingham, Buckinghamshire MK18 7DS
p.1
Inspection dates 27 February to 2 March 2023
p.1
Inspection judgements
Primary and secondary age-phase combined
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education and training Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Trainees are more than ready to enter the teaching profession by the end of the year. They are well versed in up-to-date thinking about how pupils learn best, with a good grounding in the subjects they teach. Leaders’ commitment to trainees’ success is mirrored in teaching them how to get past their own frustrations when pupils have not grasped learning and to consider why. Trainees realise the limitations of working memory and the importance of checking what pupils have retained long term. They understand the particular value of breaking learning down to meet pupils’ additional needs.
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Trainees’ immersion in evidence-based practice during the early intensive focus on behaviour management has paid dividends. Trainees are competent and confident in classroom management. Timely safeguarding training goes over and above minimum requirements. Trainees are mindful of their responsibilities for pupils’ well-being as a prerequisite for learning and are familiar with processes for reporting concerns.
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
School mentors are the gatekeepers of trainees’ lived experience and models of professional behaviours. Trainees hone their practice under mentors’ watchful eyes and learn from them and other experienced colleagues. Partnership leaders work vigilantly with mentors to track trainees’ progress. They quickly pick up anyone who is not keeping up for whatever reason, supporting and challenging them to get back on track. Trainees are open to this additional support. Leaders have cultivated an ethos where it is okay to put your head above the parapet and say if you need help.
p.1
Information about this ITE provider
◼ The partnership is in its tenth year of operation. ◼ It offers postgraduate routes to qualified teacher status in both the primary and secondary age phases. Trainees follow either the core, School Direct or School Direct (salaried) route, studying either full time over one year or part time over two years. Most take the opportunity to study for a postgraduate certificate in education with the University of Bath Spa as well. ◼ There were 36 trainees at the time of the inspection. Thirteen were training to teach five to 11 years and one three to seven years. All secondary trainees were training to teach 11 to 18 years. There are also a handful of assessment-only trainees each term. ◼ The provider works with maintained and independent schools across Buckinghamshire, Milton Keynes, Oxfordshire and West Northamptonshire. ◼ Most of the partner schools were graded good or outstanding at their last inspection.
p.2
Information about this inspection
◼ The inspection was carried out by two of His Majesty’s Inspectors and one Ofsted Inspector. ◼ Inspectors met with the director, lead mentors, the operations manager and the administrator. The lead inspector also met with the headteacher of the lead school in their role as accounting officer and the governor from the lead school who has oversight of the partnership’s work. ◼ The inspection team conducted focused reviews in early reading and languages in the primary phase and physical education, history and psychology in the secondary phase. As part of the reviews, they met with subject champions and visited six schools, plus conducting one remote visit. During these visits, inspectors met with 10 trainees and six early career teachers as well as mentors, professional tutors and headteachers. ◼ Inspectors also met either face to face or online with a further 15 trainees, as well as groups of mentors, professional tutors and subject champions.
p.2
Information about this inspection
◼ Over the course of the inspection, the team reviewed a range of the provider’s documents and information on the website, as well as responses to the trainee and staff surveys.
p.2
better?
Leaders deliberately and methodically build and deepen trainees’ learning over the successive stages of the course, weaving in the requirements of the core content framework (CCF). Central training, school experience and study each play their part. A systematic flow of information means all parties are clear about the focus of learning at any given point. Leaders’ due diligence in selecting trainers and, in turn, schools’ choice of mentors means that as a rule, trainees are learning from the best. School mentors are not though, as leaders are well aware, as familiar with the research that underpins the CCF as trainees are. Trainees build a good bank of knowledge of well-respected pedagogical research and thinking through what the partnership calls the ‘main’ curriculum. Leaders have designed a comprehensive assessment framework to check that trainees are learning, understanding and able to apply what they are taught at each stage. Experienced trainers move
p.2
better?
systematically from teaching about a topic to guiding trainees to apply the learning to their own practice. School mentors know to signpost trainees to observe experienced colleagues and let them practise and reflect to develop their knowledge and practice. However, they have not been trained to deconstruct and critique trainees’ learning at a more sophisticated level.
p.3
better?
There are notable strengths in the subject dimension of the curriculum, particularly where there are experts on hand either in the core team or within schools in the partnership. These subject champions have a clear rationale for the curriculum content, rooting it in what trainees need to learn to be well prepared to teach the subject. Primary trainees, for example, are well prepared to teach early reading. They understand why a systematic approach to teaching phonics is best for all pupils and the importance of ongoing assessment to identify and support any who are struggling to keep up.
p.3
better?
Elsewhere, leaders are still fine-tuning some specific content and the alignment between centre- and school-based training. They have sourced subject experts, reviewed time allocations and determined overviews of content, including the blend of synchronous and asynchronous learning and study. However, sometimes leaders’ decisions do not focus explicitly enough on what they want trainees to know and understand about the subject and how pupils learn it. Across subjects, assessment of trainees’ knowledge is not as forensic as it is for the pedagogical content.
p.3
better?
Accountability is strong at all levels. Professional tutors in schools are pivotal in ensuring trainees have valuable experiences. They are a useful sounding board for future developments. The core team maintains close oversight of schools’ work and trainees’ progress. They work well together to ensure quality and consistency and to keep the programme under constant review, considering stakeholders’ feedback and sector developments. Collectively, the partnership team ensures that as trainees move into their early career they and their school are fully cognisant of their strengths and professional development needs.
p.3
(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)
◼ The subject dimension of the curriculum is not as meticulously thought through as the pedagogical content. In some subjects, the focus on what trainees need to learn and the alignment between their centre- and school-based learning is not as specific as it could be. Leaders should build on their work to enrich the curriculum by clearly defining the subject pedagogy trainees need to acquire and be assessed against. ◼ Mentoring is not consistently as precise as it needs to be. There are some inconsistencies in the advice trainees receive about what is best practice. Leaders should implement their plans to enhance mentoring by ensuring that all school-based staff are fully conversant with the underpinning research and structured process for developing trainees’ practice as set out in the CCF.
p.3
comply with the ITE compliance criteria?
◼ The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.
p.4
ITE provider details
Unique reference number 70285 Inspection number 10258791
p.5
ITE provider details
This inspection was carried out in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook’.
p.5
ITE provider details
This framework and handbook sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.
p.5
ITE provider details
Type of ITE provider School-centred initial teacher training Phases provided Primary and secondary combined
p.5
ITE provider details
Date of previous inspection 1 July and 9 December 2015
p.5
Inspection team
Alison Bradley, Lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Gary Holden Ofsted Inspector James Broadbridge His Majesty’s Inspector
p.5
Annex: Placement schools
Inspectors visited the following schools as part of this inspection:
p.6
Name URN ITE phases
Buckingham School 110484 Secondary Heyford Park School 148353 Primary Padbury Church of England School 145216 Primary Royal Latin School 137344 Secondary Stowe School 110548 Secondary Winslow Church of England School 110449 Primary guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Name URN ITE phases
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-
p.7
Name URN ITE phases
government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Name URN ITE phases
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Name URN ITE phases
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion